Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
go to the page that shows all of the threads (so click on "the best region in the region!"), and click the number of total replies on the far right of this thread.wait how do you find out how many posts one has made in a particular thread
Okay, except that's a Tuesday.@Tucson we should have the next tourney on the 24th.
explain these two thoughts further plzit's only our bullshit that leads to Mk's dominance. An experiment isn't valid when it has variables that manipulate the dependent variable towards a specific result.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jD11l3omQzMDid anyone else find it curious that Japan managed to adjust to stages that they do not see regularly in tournament? Oh sure they probably put some practice in on each, but we've got years on them, so going to Frigate should be the best idea ever, right? Right? (Not against Olimar it's not... lol purples).
If you guys didn't already know, I do a bit of education research and that involves some cognitive psychology. I'll probably mix up my terms here and there, but the point that follows still stands:
We should adapt Japan's stage list. If we do so, our skill on stages outside the big 3 will improve.
Wait... so not playing on the stages will make us better... right? Yes. People learn better under truncated (simplified) conditions. In chemistry, you learn the Bohr model of the atom (electrons like planets) before you learn about proper orbitals. In Smash, a smaller stage set will allow players to concentrate more on the skills required to control your character as opposed to the gimmicks present on a moving stage. When the movement, damage, and gimmick factors are removed, we will be forced to face the problems that we try to avoid via these stage traits. They will be slowly overcome through perseverance and training.
This will work because with less factors to consider, you will be within the zone of proximital development. This is a term that is used to describe the range of cognitive stress one can survive under when learning. If I play a set with M2K (and I have. And I got whopped), I won't learn much because everything is going WAY TOO FAST. This means that the match itself is outside my zone of proximital development.
The concept works with stage gimicks too. If I have to consider whatever it is M2K is doing to me AND all the funny tricks that are present in playing a match on Brinstar or Rainbow Cruise, then I have even less of a chance of learning something significant. So I have to reduce the 'stress' on my brain.
The correct response to this problem is a simplified system
In the end, I believe that the implementation a Japanese stage set (BF, FD, SV) will greatly benefit our community via the simplification of our competitive system. Do this, and our character control and knowledge will rise to the challenge when the Japanese decide to fly their very best over to hand us our egos on a silver platter once again.
**** Olimar.I on the other hand wanna see the rise of Olimar during the MK ban.
I'm in favor.i vote for a non ban az state. WHOS WITH ME?
>You being the bestMost Legit stuff ever! mike haze getting down to the core, with stats, necessary logic finally not over looked, and being reasonable and not just getting pissed off and saying metaknight should be banned without thinking about it long enough. Another thing why metaknight should not be banned. Metaknight really forces the biggest challenge in the whole brawl game, therefor making people that strive to be better at the game acctually get better at a faster rate. all of our players 1 year from now with meta banned would not be as good as our people 1 year from now with meta not banned. Metaknight being banned= More Fun, more diversity, less pissed offness (maybe) More players. Meta not being banned= More Pissed offness, better players as indirect result, (maybe) less players. It all depends on what you want in this game. Want to be more skilled and have less fun or have more fun and be less skilled. when it comes to a competitive scene for any game or sport its mostly always about becoming better in the best way to best your opponents. I believe when playing for fun is when we should be trying to have more fun.
P.S. Im Right and no one else is that disagrees with me because im probably the best guy in the world.