theONEjanitor
Smash Champion
I just want to play smash lol
lighten up guys
lighten up guys
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
lol so i was right about some of it then? i knew that at least some of that reasoning existed.Same to you.
It's hilarious, because I did. I'm not quoting it directly or pointing you to it because I don't want to set a lynch mob out on this person. It's note my goal to ostracize or alienate them, if they want to speak up that's fine. But I'm not gonna make that choice for 'em.there's no way that munkus read "a post" from someone and then had enough information to conclude that the majority of the ASL and people involved in the ban vote are pro ban for "selfish" reasons. That's ridiculous. It's sort of insulting to the people involved to assert that they are so petty and stupid that they are unable to make a reasonable vote on whether or not an MK ban is good for the community without being selfish.
when you refuse to support something that is obviously more good than bad because it did one little thing you disagree with, that is "high and mighty" and unreasonable
Probably Marth, because he has almost no bad matchups and does rather well against a majority of characters (and still wrecks the low tiers, like Dedede). Lucario is a close second, if only because he doesn't have many bad matchups either, and his fundamentals allow him to succeed against a variety of characters, regardless.Overall MUs:
I'm curious: barring MK/the MK match-up, which character has the best overall MU spread? Marth? Snake? Diddy doesn't have many HORRIBLE match-ups, but most of them are even at best, so I can't see him being the right answer. Falco doesn't seem right either thanks to Pikachu.
Wolf:
I love Wolf. He was my first main :3 I remember seeing those videos of the guy who previewed every character's movesets, and Wolf seemed so BA. His recovery did it for me, though :/
I know the MU is HORRIBLE, but does Wolf fair any better against Pikachu than Fox? And why is Wolf's D3 MU so bad; does D3 have a small-step CG or something? Does Wolf REALLY beat Olimar?
Recovery:
Someone said to me that Zelda's recovery is worse than Link's... Is that right? O.o
![]()
pretty sure ive gotten edguarded alot trying to mix up the side b up b thing. people just anticipate the mix up as well more often than not.People get on the ledge early to edgehog your Forward-B, but in anticipating that, you can just wait and go straight up with your Up-B after half a second, and that works against everyone but people with Z-Airs, pretty much. Also, canceling Forward-B gives massive distance and allows platform camping like nobody's business.
.
Attempting to mix it up and doing it right are two very different things. It took me a while to get competent with it. It's really not simple, but once you "get" it, his recovery isn't nearly as much of an issue. Watch Seagull Man or Kain play; they probably understand.pretty sure ive gotten edguarded alot trying to mix up the side b up b thing. people just anticipate the mix up as well more often than not.
its not as simple as you make it sound lol. idk maybe it is to you lol.
wolf just has two really really unsafe recovery options the way i see it.
**** Yeah Reach! We should play sometime!**** Yeah Reach! We should play sometime!
My gamertag is Ingulit
EDIT: That's not Reach 3:
colorado sounds like a legit smash state.... not...
There is a difference between thinking "This is good for ME and THAT'S why I'm doing this" and being subconsciously influenced. I've seen some of the arguments put forth which indicate that their decision was based on their personal preference, or some other agenda than "the good of the Alabama smash community."I don't think it's fair to say most people who voted on this ban did so for selfish reasons, especially when you don't know who all voted on it. There were 12 people in the vote. About 5 of us have been outspoken about it on Smashboards. I'm not going to tell you which way each person voted, but here's the deciding body as it is now:
Ingulit
Cam
Reflex
CIN
Elev8
Ragnarok
Ryker
m3t
PoPe
Alias
Pops
Cheap
I think when you talk to these people one-on-one, you would be hard-pressed to say they based their votes on selfish reasons. They wouldn't be in this group if they didn't want what is best for the community.
That being said, ASL members do have a chance to elect a new ASL council to make these decisions. The vote wasn't supposed to be until May, but I don't see why we couldn't make it sooner since Spring is so far away.
EDIT: Ingulit, I think Marth. However, Falco is pretty safe since there won't be many (or any) Pikachus this season.
Being able to go through the stage by just holding down (Semi-scarring) is another added option. Both his recovery options are pretty safe. No one out right gimpspretty sure ive gotten edguarded alot trying to mix up the side b up b thing. people just anticipate the mix up as well more often than not.
its not as simple as you make it sound lol. idk maybe it is to you lol.
wolf just has two really really unsafe recovery options the way i see it.
I considerhe's reading your minds guyz
to be an argument based on personal preferences, not the interests of the Alabama community.he keeps sever of the weaker characters from being viable because they have a very bad matchup against him, and he is very popularly played so those characters have to face him every tournament
unviable is a vast exageration.Also, making most (technically all, but maybe one or two) of the characters in the game unviable is a serious issue, and I still don't understand how someone could be legit, unshakingly mad at wanting to ban a character that like that?
To be clear, I don't think being overpowered is a worthy cause for banning, as I've mentioned. I'm only saying I don't see why people are acting surprised and militant about it. He's clearly broken. It's not nearly as bad in melee, but if the community decided to ban sheik I would still say, okay well I see where you're coming from.Are you familiar with melee? Top tier makes the mid and bottom tier unviable. If you were going to ban a character for invalidating half the cast, sheik would have been banned ages ago. It's also a slippery slope. How many of the ****ty characters do you have to make unviable before it warrants a ban?
I dunno, all of them? Making bad characters unviable is entirely different than making all characters good and bad unviable. The only characters that come anywhere close to beating mk are MAYBE diddy (which the top diddys are denying) and MAYBE wario (which the top warios are denying), When you are literally playing sub optimally because you're not using metaknight, that's worth note. depending on who you asked, (melee people correct me if i'm wrong) fox, falco, and ice climbers all have sliightly favorable matchups with sheik. and this doesn't take into account stages, as you could severely limit sheiks effectiveness with good cp stages. I think the jiggs matchups has gotten better as well. it was never sheik or die, because there were options. Brawl is basically metaknight or die at this point. Our community has decided that that's a problem. and I understand why.How many of the ****ty characters do you have to make unviable before it warrants a ban?
wario has several even and close match ups. MK has POSSIBLY two that are anywhere near close, that he still wins anyway.unviable is a vast exageration.
seriously? two characters? im guessing youre refering to his close to even matchups. if bad MU's mean that your character is unviable theeennn... wario makes every character unviable except for like 4 or something.
im asking you how you would feel if you got your character banned and you respond "lol mk is broken though so thered be no reason to have my character banned"
munkus is telling you he read things about how the ban was biased and you are like "lol he is lieing he mad bc mk is broken"
but then you say things like "we arent banning him bc he is broken or anything lol, its for attendance"
youre just avoiding arguing or even making logical points about the subject.
im just trying to communicate here but we cant even talk about mk without trololol over here going "lol it doesnt matter he is SOOOO BROKEN" it gets old.
thats one good thing about the ban is that i wont have to hear "lol tornado so broken" "lol that is ridiculous mk is sooo ridiculous" behind every one of my matches now and i wont have to stop and laugh at how dumb mk is every time i get a shuttle loop off or something. so stupid. at least itll get everyone to shut the **** up about him for a second irl not on here loooollll
me said:if my character got banned I would be like ?
but i certainly would not refuse to support what is obviously an amazing idea in the ASL out of some ridiculous high and mighty principle that I've set for a broken game and gaming community that isn't respected by the fighting game scene or supported by the developers of the game itself. Actually, that's selfish. By definition. if you think ASL is NOT a good thing for Alabama's smash scene, you're just plainly wrong. Refusing to support it because they did something you disagree with is laughably nonsensical. And selfish.
me said:there's no way that munkus read "a post" from someone and then had enough information to conclude that the majority of the ASL and people involved in the ban vote are pro ban for "selfish" reasons. That's ridiculous. It's sort of insulting to the people involved to assert that they are so petty and stupid that they are unable to make a reasonable vote on whether or not an MK ban is good for the community without being selfish.
i dunno where you're getting the trollollol mk is broken stuff from.me said:I don't know the context of that statement exactly, I don't know how much you've omitted, BUT making most of the cast of the game unviable is something that would presumably keep people from wanting to attend tournaments. Which, from what we've been told, was the the entire point of raising this issue. If that was, indeed, the entire point of raising the issue of the ban, then I would be forced to assume that every argument made in this discussion was made in that context. Which would make that an argument about the interest of the Alabama community. You're trying to read this person's mind, as I said. You're assuming these statements are made in a different context than the one on the table. They could be, but you don't have any conclusive reason to assume so.