Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
You called?Perhaps if you could reasonably escape dtilt usmash, even a third of the time, you might find this is not so bad.
Agreed on the shadow ball bit. I'd been using ZeRo to see how a character with bottom 5 airspeed is supposed to get past Shadow Ball, and I found that options were... limited. So I was surprised when most Mewtwo players barely used it. Bless WaDi tbhYou called?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eN0FmlIDQxE
You know, for as long as fox is kept #1 in melee based on pure theory, Mewtwo should be considered to have the advantage in the diddy matchup because dtilt-usmash is not true at KO % at all ranges except point blank. It never was and it never will be.
Almost a year on and I'm still waiting for M2 players to be able to put that tech into practice. What a difference it might make.
I still believe Mewtwo players have decent room for improvement. The above tech is matchup defining but its not the only big thing that his players can improve upon still to make him a top 5 character. The main one, as I've been saying for years is using shadowball to snipe landing and shield poke.
https://gfycat.com/HatefulAnguishedCottonmouth
That was the old shadowball as well. The buffed one is even easier. There is literally no reason whatsoever for mewtwo players to not throw full charge shadowballs at enemies as they land. You either hit them in landing lag, nuke their shield or if their shield is even the slightest bit weak, it will shield stab. Every time a Mewtwo player decides not to full charge a shadowball or throws it in neutral, in my book it is the exact same as a Diddy player pulling bananas only to throw them off stage repeatedly. You have an extremely powerful tool, choosing not to use it means you should be criticised extremely harshly for making such a stupid choice.
WaDi certainly does it well. It's frustrating when commentators will be like 'oh my god what a read with that shadowball snipe' when it wasn't a read at all. He just threw it at them and it was undodgeable because landing lag frames in this game are brutal. Anyone who has ever played a sport should know, kick/throw/hit the ball where the player is running to, not where they are currently. It actually downplays Mewtwos strength and acts like it was the player that got them the kill. When diddy players get a dtilt usmash I don't see them going 'oh wow what a brilliant play' because thats the characters good trait that got the KO more than the player. The exact same should apply to Shadowball because its really not too hard to get it to hit.Agreed on the shadow ball bit. I'd been using ZeRo to see how a character with bottom 5 airspeed is supposed to get past Shadow Ball, and I found that options were... limited. So I was surprised when most Mewtwo players barely used it. Bless WaDi tbh
I'm not sure I agree that Mewtwo day 1 was that good (remembering the days where Kirby beat Mewtwo pretty easily, before patches made the MU progressively worse), but agreed on how good Shadow Ball is...WaDi certainly does it well. It's frustrating when commentators will be like 'oh my god what a read with that shadowball snipe' when it wasn't a read at all. He just threw it at them and it was undodgeable because landing lag frames in this game are brutal. Anyone who has ever played a sport should know, kick/throw/hit the ball where the player is running to, not where they are currently. It actually downplays Mewtwos strength and acts like it was the player that got them the kill. When diddy players get a dtilt usmash I don't see them going 'oh wow what a brilliant' play because thats the characters good trait that got the KO more than the player. The exact same should apply to Shadowball because its really not too hard to get it to hit.
Mewtwo was mid-high tier since day one (yes, 1.0 Mewtwo) and I still believe he is top 7 at worst because he is so damn slippery and the widest variety of reliable KO options of any character in this game. Only Ness is a close second in how he has multiple strong aerials/throws/smashes/edgeguards which can all end stocks <100%. Sure a character like DK can reliably end stocks below 70% but Mewtwo just has such a wide range of KO moves that nothing you can do is safe. Mewtwos weakness in his large frame and light weight is required to stop him from being busted.
People should know the golden rule of smash is 'don't get hit' which Mewtwo does perfectly with his speed, aerial movement, safe pokes and teleport. The next best thing is to have as many viable options at any given time, another thing which he has a lot of.
I believe in theory Mewtwo is probably 4th best behind bayo, diddy and cloud. Until people better optimise shadowball though he will remain below sonic/rosalina/sheik etc.
Especially with rage. Neutral air and foward air is good for dangerous combos, then up grab, Shadow Ball, or a smash attack. Down air off ledge if necessary. If a Mewtwo is skilled enough, the opponent could lose a stock less than thirty seconds. If Wii Fit Trainer faces a skilled Mewtwo than the round could potentially end in less than a minute and a half.And also how good Mewtwo is in terms of KO potential. In last hit situations, he's easily one of the most terrifying characters.
Opinion, m8.it makes him look like a top tier ( even though he is not ).
IIRC Sonic's main issues are that he isn't very good at dealing with foes above him due to his mediocre air game and large/lingering hitboxes that make it difficult for Sonic to use his spin dash game. Bayo has both of these elements in spades. Granted Sonic has a strong grab game due his dash grab and d-throw tech chasing, but without fearsome damage/KO power, the risk/reward and neutral game leans towards Bayonetta.My question is is the vs match up considered even or slightly in Bayonetta's favor? What does the thread think?
Pikachu in the comprehensive match up thread though, it makes him look like a top tier ( even though he is not ).
Especially with rage. Neutral air and foward air is good for dangerous combos, then up grab, Shadow Ball, or a smash attack. Down air off ledge if necessary. If a Mewtwo is skilled enough, the opponent could lose a stock less than thirty seconds. If Wii Fit Trainer faces a skilled Mewtwo than the round could potentially end in less than a minute and a half.
Something I've noticed is how people struggle against Diddy (Zero) during close- and midrange.I think the MK Diddy matchup is worth exploring a bit. Leo made it seem like MK not only has a very strong Edgeguarding game in the matchup, but also is able to consistently put diddy offstage to set up that Edgeguarding game. Combined with his ladder potential and MK has a realistic chance to KO diddy at almost any percent. I’m not exactly saying that MK wins or that it’s an even matchup (I’d probably guess slight diddy favored, but volatile), but it is worth noting that zero has owned Leo other characters for a long time and leo’s MK has totally flipped the script
Please make your posts more substantial in the future.Opinion, m8.
Though, hey, it's a possibility.
Remember though, that may the case at much higher levels, but even low tiers have some usage down in mid-level player range. That's also where the vast majority of players are at.1) There are some chars not worth discussing the competitive worth of. Discussing Dedede is like discussing Luvdisc's place in the Pokemon metagame.
If it's a new thread for these character discussions, it won't be an issue since that thread is dedicated to one character at certain times. If the character discussions were in this thread though, then it would be a problem.2) Let's say it's Link's week for discussion. Halfway through the week, Roy gets a high placing at an A rank or higher tourney. Suddenly the discussion shifts away from Link, then the structure falls apart a bit.
Perfectly fine, take as much time as you need.Lord Dio Hey, before this post, I just wanted to talk about the two things you requested me in this site before: The video of somebody using the DThrow>Back Jump>Double Jump as kill confirm for Marth and Bowser hitboxes.
I'm sorry it's been so long and I've not provided them to you yet. The hitboxes take a long time to make (mostly because of my process of getting them as webms, gifs and stills takes a very long time to make when most people just get gifs) and I kind of forget to get the Marth Kill Confirm and when I do remember and ask around the lab nobody has a an example readily available or even remember to give them to me to show you. I apologise for both of those, it's real bad on my part. The hitbox stuff takes so long I haven't even posted all of the hitboxes I do have ready here in Smashboards (if I'm not mistaken I have a set totally ready just sitting in my Hard Drive I have not had the time to upload). Just hope you understand. I'll get back to you eventually.
Interesting goal, never thought about that. Keep up the good work. So where will this thread be? I think er should talk about characters that do not get attention before high and top tiers, they are the ones that usually get the spotlight in the boards. Looking forward to that new thread!Sorry to veer off track a bit, but I think some sort of new thread or organized system by a willing volunteer should be made to discuss each character weekly. I remember there was something like that that the Brawl BR did, where they would give their thoughts each week on a random character. But this would include everyone here of course. More and more do I feel that I'm forgetting characters outside of the top,high, and few middle tier spots. When was the last time we have discussed someone like ROB's or DDD tier list position in depth?
I think it would be fun, invigorating, and educational in case we get another breakout character (from the looks of it, imo it's gonna be Roy or Greninja if Salem works on him). It would be nice to focus in a character weekly instead of random users getting 1-2 posts in before it is derailed. I understand this thread is for competitive character discussion and tier list placement, but it also encompasses more topics than that. This idea would put 100% on that chosen character for the week. It would pool all general thoughts in one space (Good luck searching here until months back on solid Bowser Jr posts). It would bring more discussion outside of character boards. Some of those boards are dying.
Like my post if you'd like to see weekly character discussion like this and maybe a new thread can be organized. There isn't anything like this now,is there? If so,let me know and I'll go back to bed and question my lack of attentiveness.
Opinion, m8.
Though, hey, it's a possibility.
IIRC Sonic's main issues are that he isn't very good at dealing with foes above him due to his mediocre air game and large/lingering hitboxes that make it difficult for Sonic to use his spin dash game. Bayo has both of these elements in spades. Granted Sonic has a strong grab game due his dash grab and d-throw tech chasing, but without fearsome damage/KO power, the risk/reward and neutral game leans towards Bayonetta.
Also Skeeter Mania for ****s sake, quit flippantly disregarding everything people say as "your opinion m8" when it differs from your's or the general consensus . That is the entire POINT of this damn thread. Someone may see a character or MU in one light based on their experiences with game along with interpretation of the frame data/hitboxes and people will either agree with them or challenge that by offering up opposing evidence or calling said view into question.
Once we see the different ways in which to look at the meta, we can learn and grow as players. Does this discourse occur that cleanly all the time? Definitely not. But just dismissing someone's point as just an opinion is horribly crass even if said point isn't that well conceived. While you don't actively belittle people like some people in this thread, your actions continuously grate the patience of the people here so I suggest you shape up and either find a way to constructively contribute or just be quiet and lurk.
Thank you KakuCP9 and |RK| . I am glad my question is answered! I just want to point out Skeeter Mania that you should always give a good answer to someone's opinion, especially in a competitive thread like this. It is kind of like a question on a final exam requires you to say if you believe in this and why, and you just say "your opinion m8" on the final exam question. Skeeter Mania , please make informative posts with detail, not just "your opinion m8".Please make your posts more substantial in the future.
Thanks for bringing up Meta Knight, and you are right about one thing: Meta Knight's down air is really good. It can be used as an edge guard for characters in the high tier that have exploitable recoveries ( Fox, Cloud, Mario, Captain Falcon, Lucario, and maybe Corrin are some notable examples.). Meta Knight's down air can even be used to mess up some characters and get a horizontal screen kill. I also think the Meta Knight match up against Mario is actually getting better. And Meta Knight does have top tier mobility. Good post!And just because only dash attack or grab lead to ladders, does NOT mean that these are his only neutral options. Dair knocks you down, is really safe, and if anything in his arsenal leads to dash attack or grab then... well, you get the same conversion with a few extra damage on top, and your neutral gets that much better. I think people focus on those two options because together they 'cover everything', though simply placing a safe hitbox is a great answer. Cstick dash attack is great for MK getting dash attacks in weird situations, such as after a perfect pivot or even a simple walk back. MKLeo showed the world how scary a mobile MK can be. It is interesting that this is his choice vs Zero, but the more I think about it the more it makes perfect sense.
Mk is good yo. Theres a reason it is in half the top players names. its totally not because they wanted to pretend they liked the character as a character in brawl >_>
My first questions on any reverse fair combo would be, is it character specific, and, does it require DI behind Bowser?Okay, @Irki, KakuCP9 , and others, since you asked...
Can I bring up a specific Bowser combo that I haven't seen in over a year?
Up throw -> Reverse Fair -> Bair (kill combo at around 40%)
First of all, to anyone who plays Bowser to some degree (especially mains), what kind of controller setup would be most optimal for such a combo?
Second, the only times I've seen this combo are in a Bowser combo video and by Nairo at a tournament last year (I forgot what it was). What would you say is the reliability of the combo and whether one can feasibly do it in tight situations?
That I don't know. My only source to go off of is a combo video.My first questions on any reverse fair combo would be, is it character specific, and, does it require DI behind Bowser?
After seeing Cosmos go from losing to sheiks and void in his early preformances to beating both the two best sheiks in the world despite sheik having all the tools to overwhelm corrin the mu looks not as bad as I expected with Cosmos results in the mu.Corrin has a very good trait in the fact that he can render Sheiks amazing disadvantage to being pretty vulnerable with amazing range, juggle frametraps and super hard punishes at ledge and landing with pin, DFS and other tools.
Needle camping isnt as effective as it seems as corrin can oos pin sheik needles if it is remotely not at max distance. Sheik cant trap corrins landings as well as other characters nor has many good killing tools on him. Combine this with an abundance of kill moves and a kill throw corrin can compete well.
Sheiks main advantage in the mu is her speed and ledgetraping but when her godlike disadvantage is rendered into becoming a complete guessing game versus Corrin she does not win essily.
Seems like a good idea. I assume it would run similar to the best moves thread? In that case, I could run it.Sorry to veer off track a bit, but I think some sort of new thread or organized system by a willing volunteer should be made to discuss each character weekly. I remember there was something like that that the Brawl BR did, where they would give their thoughts each week on a random character. But this would include everyone here of course. More and more do I feel that I'm forgetting characters outside of the top,high, and few middle tier spots. When was the last time we have discussed someone like ROB's or DDD tier list position in depth?
I think it would be fun, invigorating, and educational in case we get another breakout character (from the looks of it, imo it's gonna be Roy or Greninja if Salem works on him). It would be nice to focus in a character weekly instead of random users getting 1-2 posts in before it is derailed. I understand this thread is for competitive character discussion and tier list placement, but it also encompasses more topics than that. This idea would put 100% on that chosen character for the week. It would pool all general thoughts in one space (Good luck searching here until months back on solid Bowser Jr posts). It would bring more discussion outside of character boards. Some of those boards are dying.
Like my post if you'd like to see weekly character discussion like this and maybe a new thread can be organized. There isn't anything like this now,is there? If so,let me know and I'll go back to bed and question my lack of attentiveness.
That shouldn't be too much of a problem, considering all that discussion would happen in this thread, not the character discussion thread. I feel like an "emerging threats" thread would just be a bunch of posts immediately after a major while being dead all other times...Let's say it's Link's week for discussion. Halfway through the week, Roy gets a high placing at an A rank or higher tourney. Suddenly the discussion shifts away from Link, then the structure falls apart a bit.
Perfect, we could work together on it if you wanna PM me for a game plan. I know someone brought up the point that some characters aren't worth discussing...but Smashboards I feel should apply to all levels of play. Over in BC here, our best player uses DDD. So it can encompass everything about a character at all levels, not just S-A tier viable characters. I would like to focus on characters with less discussion first, or some other agreed upon system. I just see all too often people try to bring up discussion about a character, only for it to die within a few posts as another more breaking event comes up or someone chooses to change the subject. This discussion topic would make sure everyone gets the change without interruption.Seems like a good idea. I assume it would run similar to the best moves thread? In that case, I could run it.
That shouldn't be too much of a problem, considering all that discussion would happen in this thread, not the character discussion thread. I feel like an "emerging threats" thread would just be a bunch of posts immediately after a major while being dead all other times...
That’s basically Fox’s life in general though, it’s not some unique to Corrinwith labbing isnt too bad because we can body him in disadvantage destroy his recovery for example (it's like slight disadvantage for corrin).
That, and chances are that all it would really be is the same nonsense you see in this thread after every major of how X is totally higher on the tier list than previously thought/how Y totally does well vs [insert top 4 character here] based on absolutely nothing but one setARGHETH said:I feel like an "emerging threats" thread would just be a bunch of posts immediately after a major while being dead all other times...
Sorry about that I should have explained it further.That’s basically Fox’s life in general though, it’s not some unique to Corrin
Like idk why when talking about why a character does “well” vs Fox one’s primary point would be “ yeah we kick the **** outta him in disadvantage and wreck his recovery” when literally everyone in the game does that to him
a more convincing argument would involve stuff like “X character can keep up with him in neutral”, “X character has ways to mitigate his bonkers advantage state”, etc
That, and chances are that all it would really be is the same nonsense you see in this thread after every major of how X is totally higher on the tier list than previously thought/how Y totally does well vs [insert top 4 character here] based on absolutely nothing but one set
Okay, @Irki, KakuCP9 , and others, since you asked...
Can I bring up a specific Bowser combo that I haven't seen in over a year?
Up throw -> Reverse Fair -> Bair (kill combo at around 40%)
First of all, to anyone who plays Bowser to some degree (especially mains), what kind of controller setup would be most optimal for such a combo?
Second, the only times I've seen this combo are in a Bowser combo video and by Nairo at a tournament last year (I forgot what it was). What would you say is the reliability of the combo and whether one can feasibly do it in tight situations?
Uthrow > Rar Fair > Bair is true. It doesn’t require DI behind Bowser. It’s easier to get with rage and on heavies and fast fallers though.My first questions on any reverse fair combo would be, is it character specific, and, does it require DI behind Bowser?
Good point. I think Bowser can Reverse Forward Air to a possible gimp. It is also a useful edge guarding tool and a way to make a horizontal combo. It has some good knock back and damage which makes it a useful edge guarding tool.Bowser has a lot of combos and mix ups out of Rar fair that are more practical than you’d think.
It's not necessarily a win. It's just a bit of a dangerous matchup.New I understand and believe that Bowser wins the match up against Marth, but why? An explanation would be nice.
Okay sure, be sure to highlight me once Doc's week happens, so i can play my little game: Every time Mario gets mentioned in someone's argument about Doc, i'll take a shot. I can assure you that i'd be dead without even reaching the 2nd page. Some people haven't put time into researching in depth the reasons as to why X Mid/Low Tier may or may not have a niche given that some of his tools can be useful against Y Relevant character. And you can't really put the blame on them because such knowledge isn't really worthwhile aside from the sheer ability of talking about it: If you play a good character, you probably win these irrelevant matchups, and if by any chance you're bad at them or the other character has a shot at it: Well, they're irrelevant. Why would you train your Mario or Fox against Doc if no one plays Doc?Sorry to veer off track a bit, but I think some sort of new thread or organized system by a willing volunteer should be made to discuss each character weekly. I remember there was something like that that the Brawl BR did, where they would give their thoughts each week on a random character. But this would include everyone here of course. More and more do I feel that I'm forgetting characters outside of the top,high, and few middle tier spots. When was the last time we have discussed someone like ROB's or DDD tier list position in depth?
I think it would be fun, invigorating, and educational in case we get another breakout character (from the looks of it, imo it's gonna be Roy or Greninja if Salem works on him). It would be nice to focus in a character weekly instead of random users getting 1-2 posts in before it is derailed. I understand this thread is for competitive character discussion and tier list placement, but it also encompasses more topics than that. This idea would put 100% on that chosen character for the week. It would pool all general thoughts in one space (Good luck searching here until months back on solid Bowser Jr posts). It would bring more discussion outside of character boards. Some of those boards are dying.
Like my post if you'd like to see weekly character discussion like this and maybe a new thread can be organized. There isn't anything like this now,is there? If so,let me know and I'll go back to bed and question my lack of attentiveness.
Well a character thread is better than none. I am sure the moderators can balance things out ( like end the messy conversation ) and tell the posters to talk about a certain character for the week. Some characters may not spark as many discussion as others, but every character always sparks a discussion. You do have a point of the competitive discussion, the bottom tiers do not have enough strong results or even results to have a discussion about them. So we can chat about their match ups and how to be able to do well against them? Maybe you can also talk about the moves they can do against strong characters and weak match ups. Sonic vs Kirby is a very interesting and at the same time depressing for Kirby ( It is one of the worst match ups in the entire game ). I personally think a charter discussion would be a great idea and the issues will be hopefully dealt with.^There could be merit in that sort of thread. However, there's a few potential issues:
1) There are some chars not worth discussing the competitive worth of. Discussing Dedede is like discussing Luvdisc's place in the Pokemon metagame.
2) Let's say it's Link's week for discussion. Halfway through the week, Roy gets a high placing at an A rank or higher tourney. Suddenly the discussion shifts away from Link, then the structure falls apart a bit.
3) A character that doesn't spark discussion kills the thread.
Perhaps this could be solved with an "Emerging threat" thread, which discusses characters who are emerging out of the woodwork and are breaking their perceived viability?
Perfect. Just letting you all know the thread is in the work, I believe ARGHETH is hosting it with me in the background. When the thread opens, I encourage people to make posts akin to Remilia's here. Just basically what's on your mind,with some sustanence. There will be topic suggestions if conversation stales. If you're ignorsnt about a character, don't be shy. Other mroe knowledgeable mains will be able to help contribute and enlighten posters. We should be looking to learn by the end of each week something new or relavent about a character. Even if they are able to discover the slightest niche to the current meta for a bottom tier...that's progress.Okay sure, be sure to highlight me once Doc's week happens, so i can play my little game: Every time Mario gets mentioned in someone's argument about Doc, i'll take a shot. I can assure you that i'd be dead without even reaching the 2nd page. Some people haven't put time into researching in depth the reasons as to why X Mid/Low Tier may or may not have a niche given that some of his tools can be useful against Y Relevant character. And you can't really put the blame on them because such knowledge isn't really worthwhile aside from the sheer ability of talking about it: If you play a good character, you probably win these irrelevant matchups, and if by any chance you're bad at them or the other character has a shot at it: Well, they're irrelevant. Why would you train your Mario or Fox against Doc if no one plays Doc?
Seriously though, I'm okay with the idea in paper, but in concept, it will just expose the people's incompetence & very basic knowledge of half of the cast. Let the people freely talk about characters as they wish, because that's pretty much how our mind functions: You witness something, more or less personal, regarding a character, that leads you into thinking: " What's so wrong/right with this character? Why are they ( not ) working ? " and let those who feel confident enough to share their opinions on the subject given their experience and knowledge on the matter.
That being said, since you mentioned R.O.B, i'll start a subject of my own:
R.O.B kind of sucks, doesn't he?
I mean, think about it for a bit: R.O.B's a character with among the most easily breakable zoning games out there, because he's dependable on the Gyro, a throwable item that sure gives him a bunch of advantages like strong ledge trapping game and some combos upclose, the whole throwable item baiting game can also be somewhat efficient against the more careful opponents. But do these perks really outweigh the fact that a mispaced Gyro will remain useless for a little while, which is usually enough for the opponent to reach R.O.B. At that point, what's left of R.O.B? A character with an overall bad frame data, absolutely abysmal out of shield game, and most importantly, a terrible disadvantage state. Given how easy it is for R.O.B to reach such a state, and how swordies with their juggling games, or brawlers with their pressure should make something off of that mistake, does R.O.B really beat any of the relevant characters? I mean sure, he can clutch things out due to aforementioned tools, and a consistent ( but kind of mediocre once known how to be dealt with ) damage output out of grabs.
So yeah, i don't have much faith in R.O.B: The aforementioned major hole in his already breakable zoning based neutral kind of renders him too easily beaten, and at that point, R.O.B's bound to take a lot of damage from most of the good characters. R.O.B doesn't really have a niche, and clutch can only get you so far. Much like Robin, inexperience can also only get you so far. However, i may be underselling some of ROB's strong assets, or overthinking the consequences of his holes in neutral, and that good R.O.B players can work around it well enough. Tell me why you think so, because i'm interested.
Lucario is actually quite a threat, and ZeRo considers him a top tier even. I know this sounds weird but Aura is actually a somewhat good edge guarding tool ( Like Mewtwo's Shadow Ball ) and his grabs ( when at max aura ) can kill characters at fifty percent even. Lucario with no aura is somewhat okay, but Lucario with more aura can kill at ridiculously low percents and his a good up air follow up ( ehh kind of like Mario ). Plus, Aura is stacked with rage. Lucario can do the annoying Aura Sphere edge guard and annoy the heck out of the opponent seeking to go upwards. His neutral can be good ( especially with max aura ). I just want to mention Lucario's aura from Brawl was buffed, and the Rage Mechanic got in the game. I think he has a potential to have a good neutral.I have a small, off-topic comment to make:
I don't quite understand how Lucario's neutral is considered to be weak. I've been in a minor character crisis between Lucario and Kirby as of late (because of playstyle fit, not perceived strength), and so I've been practicing more Lucario.
When you take notes from Venia's Greninja + WaDi's Mewtwo, Lucario's neutral seems simple yet very effective. Charge aura sphere a little. Choose an action - nair, grab, shoot aura sphere, bait something else with his great foxtrot...
And that gets to be way more terrifying when he has aura. Against, say, Marcina... whiff punishing with a dash attack is new to me (very solid burst option). It just seems like he has a number of ways to safely threaten pressure or play around his opponent's range.
I'm certainly no high-level player. But I will say that he seems to have all the neutral tools you could want. Anyone better educated on the character want to tell me what I'm missing (neutral-wise)?
(Well, obviously his frame data is iffy, but the same applies to Greninja/Mewtwo).
Agree. Aura sphere when big enough is one of the best ledge traps in the game. It hits while charging and combos into Usmash to catch ledge get ups and jumps and he can fire it on reaction to hit rolls. Characters without disjointed aerials can't really do anything.Lucario is actually quite a threat, and ZeRo considers him a top tier even. I know this sounds weird but Aura is actually a somewhat good edge guarding tool ( Like Mewtwo's Shadow Ball ) and his grabs ( when at max aura ) can kill characters at fifty percent even. Lucario with no aura is somewhat okay, but Lucario with more aura can kill at ridiculously low percents and his a good up air follow up ( ehh kind of like Mario ). Plus, Aura is stacked with rage. Lucario can do the annoying Aura Sphere edge guard and annoy the heck out of the opponent seeking to go upwards. His neutral can be good ( especially with max aura ). I just want to mention Lucario's aura from Brawl was buffed, and the Rage Mechanic got in the game. I think he has a potential to have a good neutral.
Honestly, I'm not even concerned about the reverse AS ledgetrap. Personally, I think the more flexible ledgetrap is just holding AS at roll distance. It's more dangerous than what Mewtwo does with Shadow Ball, as holding ledge doesn't beat it, roll = death, and jump can be caught more easily. Disjoints are pretty much irrelevant against that.Agree. Aura sphere when big enough is one of the best ledge traps in the game. It hits while charging and combos into Usmash to catch ledge get ups and jumps and he can fire it on reaction to hit rolls. Characters without disjointed aerials can't really do anything.
IMO Lucario's at the upper end of high tier but not quight Marth/Corrin level.