How does being carried imply any of that?
You just assumed that yourself.
You literally said "Sure, play to win, blame the game, don't blame the players, they were already good players pre-bayo
(altho i extremely doubt that LMAO)"
Tyroy was apparently considered to be best in Chicago only being ranked lower due to being unable to participate in tournies due to school. Hell Ally just defended his placement on twitter and Ally hates Bayo
I believe that Smash 4 was Saj's first smash game( this was wrong apparently he played brawl), and he plays it as a hobby, and he first played peach, a character that is maybe low high tier but more likely just mid tier assuming you knew how to do a bunch of unintuitive tech. Even with that he frequently placed well and took sets off of Ryo in a MU that is likely not in peaches favor ( She hates most disjoint characters)
PinkFresh got super good results in Brawl playing a character with crippling weaknesses, placed well in a couple nationals in PM that I know of, and placed well at Xanadu for a long time while not owning the game or a wii u thriving off pure fundamentals. Hell he took the last xanadu going all lucas just for the fun of it.
Being carried is like the Puff vs Falco crew battle at pound where Hbox took like nine stocks to clutch out the win. It implies that nobody elses effort mattered because Hbox essentially did everything. It implies that the character's "Skill" is the one getting the wins not the player piloting it. This is pretty widely held definition.
Some good players dont travel because if you dont place in the money you've potentially wasted a ton of money, and may not come to local tournaments that often due to having a life outside smash. Results aren't everything regardless of how annoying that is to amateur analysts like us.
ok, so since February Kamemushi's placings have been:
- 1st/116 at KSB 2016 (Komorikiri, 9B, Ranai, KEN, Earth, and others present)
- 1st/128 at Kurobura 1 (Nietono and Umeki present)
- 4th/192 at Umebura 22 (much of East Japan's top talent and 9B present)
- 3rd/96 at TUS Tournament 4 (Abadango, Nyanko, Motsunabe, KEN, and others present)
- 7th/230 at Sumabato 8 (all of West Japan's top talent present other than Ranai)
- 7th/180 at Umebura 21 (much of East Japan's top talent present)
- 7th/80 at SHIG Tournament (many top players present)
including victories over Komorikiri, 9B, Shu, Choco, Nyanko, KEN, Aki, Atelier, Umeki, Songun, Nasubi, taranito, Eim, Brood, and other solid Japanese players. He's also demonstrated mastery of his character with his usage of lemons and vertical spacing as well as some of the stuff we'd only think could be done in training mode (footstool lemon resets etc). I think it's safe to call him the best Mega Man at this point. His resume is actually just more impressive than Scatt's at this point.
Would somewhat disagree, Scatt has only just started traveling, and despite his results not being as high based on direct placement comparison, we would have to compare how good the players Scatt plays here directly to Japanese players which is a pretty fruitless endeavor. The too biggest wins are Komo, choco, and 9B. Zoners may do well against Bayo and 9B struggled against Megaman as Ryu as well, and his record in Smash 4 is kind of shaky.
Komo played sonic, a bad matchup for sonic, and cloud, a match up that Scatt proved was doable by beating M2K.
Didnt see the Choco match.
Like dont get me wrong Kamemushi is either the best or second best by a close margin, and it literally doesnt matter who is the best, I just hate when people put so much stock in being the best whatever and use placements that dont always show true player skill (for example what If I got 33rd at a national but I only lost to Nairo and Zero who go on to take first and second and I actually played the matches pretty well, in theory I could probably have placed at least a bit higher)