Steam doesn't require you to constantly be online in order to play your Steam games. That being said, I'm generally not okay with digital distribution in general simply because if said distribution platform goes offline, there goes all of the money that you've sunk into it. All of your games are gone forever, especially since MS sought to completely eliminate disks with the Xbone. That means that if MS had decided to stay with their original plan for the Xbone, once they decided to discontinue services for the Xbone suddenly the console becomes a paper weight that you can never use again, even for single player games.
As said before, this extended to Steam as well. I'm actually really uncomfortable with so many of my PC games being so closely tied to Steam. If Steam every went down that would mean that my physical copies of games like ES5 and Alan Wake would be useless since they require a Steam account to play. IMO that's pure bull****, if I own the disk I should be able to play it without a digital distribution platform. Its only because of Steam's generous sales that Valve gets off scott-free. Although when Steam first launched, it was met with very similar resistance.
I agree with pretty much all of this. I'm very wary of Steam, but I do have a good many games on because I'm not worried about eventually losing access to a game I only spent 5 bucks on in the first place. But yeah, the impermanence of Steam games is a big concern for me and the reason I rallied hard against the original Xbox One plan.
On a related note, though, I think Nintendo should be held just as accountable for their ****ty downloaded games policy, just in the opposite sense. They need to start tying games to accounts and having more frequent digital sales, or their digital sales numbers will suffer.
As said before, its because MS even considered always-online being a console-wide thing.
I think the bottom line is that I don't really care since they changed it, and some do. That's fine, I suppose, and now the onus is on Microsoft to come out with as much good software as they can to try to win people back. I think that's all they can do at this point. Since they aren't known for their exclusives, that may spell trouble for them (although I was very surprised that they published Dead Rising 3, so I guess they could surprise me again). So yeah, ball's really in MS's court to not just reverse their decision, but find a way to make the Xbone worth a purchase even to those alienated by MS's original intentions.
IMO Nintendo and Sony are about equal, both provide their player base with excellent exclusives. Although Sony has sadly been focusing on that whole "online" thing that everyone seems to be in love with these days. Thankfully, we still have Nintendo for good old local multiplayer.
Glad I am of that! Being in college, I have really great access to couch co-op partners, though, and I understand that that can be much harder to come by for people in more settled stages of life or rural areas. I also understand that the money really is in making great online experiences. Hopefully Nintendo's formula succeeds and shows just how much fun folks can have playing a game together in the same room. Local multiplayer really is a dying trend, and it's damn shame, because I think even a boring game can be made pretty fun with the right friend(s) in the room.