Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
What do you do if your opponent refuses to commit to easily punishable moves? A lot of good players know when they are in killing range and what moves are going to kill them from where and %'s, so they likely won't throw any stupid moves at you that you can just bair/f-smash them for being stupid.Walk around and shield til they do something punishable then kill them
I agree.So yeah... if it isnt with Bair we cant force kills on smart players :/
Yes, sometimes they do, it worked on Kentucky's #1 PR'd player to the point he called me a wifi wolf. And sometimes you have to D-smash 3 times, or 4 or 5 times, but sometimes, eventually, they run into it (2 times is usually enough, but hell, why not 5). Obviously you have to watch your opponent to see what they are doing, if they stay in shield or retreat or use a projectile. You don't spam d-smash if they jump at you or you know they like to turtle and they are pros at power shielding/D3.2. Smart people don't run into spamming Dsmash.
Then u grab them if they dont do anything, and that puts them in a bad position, u just said u wud grab Tyser at 180%. Like I'm not going to go thru everything about it. You can't force anything in this game, you can make players react, walking around and shielding is one of the best ways to do that, and if your opponent is just sitting in shield then you can start to grab. Only safe move we have to pressure is bairWhat do you do if your opponent refuses to commit to easily punishable moves? A lot of good players know when they are in killing range and what moves are going to kill them from where and %'s, so they likely won't throw any stupid moves at you that you can just bair/f-smash them for being stupid.
I'm being serious, that's part of why I lose to Tyser because he plays so ****ing safe with D3 that I wind up grabbing him at 180% instead of forcing a kill.
It almost seems as if I have to keep bair fresh to kill with :/
I agree.
Also, it takes you 5 minutes to read my posts? I should also mention I don't approve of the lack of creativity in your meme creation.
Yes, sometimes they do, it worked on Kentucky's #1 PR'd player to the point he called me a wifi wolf. And sometimes you have to D-smash 3 times, or 4 or 5 times, but sometimes, eventually, they run into it (2 times is usually enough, but hell, why not 5). Obviously you have to watch your opponent to see what they are doing, if they stay in shield or retreat or use a projectile. You don't spam d-smash if they jump at you or you know they like to turtle and they are pros at power shielding/D3.
It's Mix ups, learning your opponent and making sure you don't over commit and know when your "tricks" aren't working. If the d-smash spam doesn't work, sometimes I won't use that idea for a while, or maybe I'll just try again because it's so demoralizing to fall for stupid **** like that.
I mean, if you have seen me play, it's not like every single time I try to kill I just spam d-smash. But if people think I'm going to just spam d-smash, it could mean a lot of things. Like they don't think I'm going to jump and fair them because my last kill I got from them being careless and running into a d-smash. They think I'm going to spam d-smash!
There, I think I actually gave some kind of insight. Not sure if it's good or if you agree, but it's actually what I think.
+15 points more for Austria.# of people who confused me with Doc King within the last 3 days: 4
Adding a comment to this: I agree. However, some characters need to be pressured to react and like a passive opponent, TLink, Link, Snake/Olimar at times, G&W etc.You can't force anything in this game, you can make players react, walking around and shielding is one of the best ways to do that,
If u get away with spamming dsmash then you are using MK.
DDD's a fat sack of c*** and Snake's Utilt horizontal range is longer than Link's Fsmash1. That is all.Like I said, it worked in a 5 dollar MM vs Kryz, but I don't always spam d-smash, but sometimes I do and sometimes it gets 1 kill in a set.
I am rarely in a position where I am in a "high level match", and in those matches I'm either facing D3/Snake or the occasional Olimar, and those 3 characters are NOT ones that I would recommend spamming d-smash vs because of D3/Oli's grab and snakes grenades/up-tilt's range. But, I might go for the double d-smash every once in a while.
Also, I am specifically saying to spam d-smash for kills, not overall play.
Who is Doc King?# of people who confused me with Doc King within the last 3 days: 4
What'cha talking about? Is this about a sport(s)?+15 points more for Austria.
I wouldn't; it sounds boring.I'd actually love to watch that match.
Character dependent and this doesn't happen because brawl stages are too small for this. This only happens if they're planking.So, two people have the strategy of "Wait for opponent to throw move, punish accordingly." Both of these players play by this STRICTLY! If no one throws out a move to poke shields, no one moves into an unsafe grab zone and people just play footsies, AND no one even jumps, the game is just going to end in a timeout 0%. Sure, some people have projectiles, but wolfs blaster is incredibly unsafe at times.
I'd actually love to watch that match.
MRM places well in NE. I think HE KNOWS what he's talking about.MRM, I think Kain knows what he's talking about, there's a reason he places so well.
I never said you didn't agree with Kain.I don't see anything anywhere that says I don't agree with Kain, I'm just asking further questions and proposing insane things/
That's the Link in you talking.I'm just asking further questions and proposing insane things/
I think knowing why and experiencing it is the best way I personally develop my game.Ok then, that's a good idea too! Better to understand why things work instead of just agreeing that they do, cause knowing why helps~
That MD reading. KRD said something that came off that way. I was not speaking to you. Though I guess you might have thought I thought that you thought that because KRD said that so it's aight yo.I never said you didn't agree with Kain.
+5 points back for Nebraska.
I would have made your boomerang/(insert something awesome)ness happy tonight (I might have a few randoms interested in getting better in brawl!!!!!)That's the Link in you talking.
incumbent office holders are rarely voted out of office in a single term in all three government branches. no one cares on the republican side because whoever they choose will have an incredibly high chance of losing; vice versa for the democratic side.Does anyone you know give a **** about the election this year? Back 4 years ago, Facebook was insane with political stuff and people were arguing left and right IN MAY about stuff, and it just got worse and more intense.
Now this year, all I read is "Go Ron Paul!" stuff. There doesn't seem to be any hype from the casuals in the least.
Why should 18-25 year old people care? All that effects them is they're the ideal military age, collage costs and they have to live with the decisions and effects of now for the rest of their livesSidenote question:
This shouldn't incite a debate since this is so flat a question, I'm just curious.
Does anyone you know give a **** about the election this year? Back 4 years ago, Facebook was insane with political stuff and people were arguing left and right IN MAY about stuff, and it just got worse and more intense.
Now this year, all I read is "Go Ron Paul!" stuff. There doesn't seem to be any hype from the casuals in the least.
It's possible that references I make aren't meant to be taken literally. I did use the word 'should' in my phrasing too.As a person living in a democratic country where you are forced to vote, I disagree with your train of thought.
Yeah otherwise we get fined lol.You're forced to vote?
Gheb_01 Gheb_01 Gheb_01 Gheb_01 Gheb_01 Gheb_01 Gheb_01 Gheb_01 Gheb_01
Gheb_01 Gheb_01 Gheb_01
That namesearch bait.
good response. But I just find it funny that people who would chastise you over your allegiance/lack of an allegiance vs their candidate last year don't even know serious issues outside of online piracy and "the economy sucks".incumbent office holders are rarely voted out of office in a single term in all three government branches. no one cares on the republican side because whoever they choose will have an incredibly high chance of losing; vice versa for the democratic side.
http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/thepresidentandcabinet/tp/One-Term-Presidents.htm
Well, they should care because of propaganda and the idea that their idea might make a change for the better, even though quite a few people these days are so cynical that they learn they are being lied to at a young age.Why should 18-25 year old people care? All that effects them is they're the ideal military age, collage costs and they have to live with the decisions and effects of now for the rest of their lives
South Park illustrated it well in the giant d***** vs t*** sandwich episode. Everyone should vote. It's up to people to make a world for people but since we do have politics people should make their voices heard in the government too.
I think it's pretty silly that they would force people to vote, unless they had some kind of poll exam to become eligible. Some people do people a favor by not voting because they don't understand the issues and the implications of their votes.As a person living in a democratic country where you are forced to vote, I disagree with your train of thought.
Seagull should assign points for this imho.Yeah otherwise we get fined lol.
I think that's information people should know and I agree with a lot of your commentary.I don't like the idea of people being forced to vote (the South Park used that 'Vote or Die' rap so I thought you were referring to a more serious, hypothetical scenario :/ ). But thinking on that further, Americans are forced to attend school until 16, forced to pay for insurance to drive, taxes, pay for sanitation, purchase taxes (gotta eat to live) etc. And voting rights have been jeopardized several times.
(This is meant for younger people but gets down to the issue concisely:
http://www.tolerance.org/activity/voting-rights-act-1965-and-beyond
"The Voting Rights Act was reauthorized in 1970, 1965, 1982 and 2006. In each instance, Congress looked at evidence that showed that African Americans’ voting rights were still in danger in the states identified in the original 1965 law. In 2009, the Voting Rights Act faced a challenge in the Supreme Court.
...
Recently new roadblocks have arisen that many people think threaten the hard-earned successes of the civil rights movement. In many states, new restrictions have been enacted for the stated reason of combating voter fraud. In reality, instances of voting fraud are nearly non-existent. The new restrictions actually threaten the voting rights of African Americans and Latinos, as well as young voters and low-income people.
(Voting groups who favor democrats, I will add.)
And I do favor everyone having insurance.
http://beyondhealthcarereform.com/2011/01/looking-ahead-to-2014-individual-mandate/
"Beginning in 2014, individuals will be subject to a mandate—required to have health insurance—or be subject to a fee. Generally, the fee will be $695 by 2016. (See new Code Section 5000A.) However, if the premium for an employee’s employer-provided health insurance coverage is more than 8% of the employee’s modified household income, the employee is not required to have health insurance and will not be subject to the fee. The 8% is calculated using the least expensive, self-only health insurance premium option offered by the individual’s employer-sponsored health insurance plan. For a household income of $30,000, if the premium is more than $2,400, the individual is not required to have health insurance coverage, but if the premium is $2,400 or less, the individual must have health insurance coverage or pay the penalty."
(I scratched myself on a barbed wire last year; it would have cost me over $1,000 for the tetanus shot. When my grandpa fell and fractured his leg the ambulance ride alone was >$1,400).
I don't know Aussie history. Actually I'm really ignorant of laws outside the US :/ . All I can say now is not being forced to vote has downsides too and can potentially, really s**** with the system.
BTW, how much is the fine?
Edit:
Everyone stopped posting for 7 hours?
Helping the gears start to move: