How is this a thing? ,_, Why isn't this simply TO discretion? I'm talking about what constitutes as wobbling. If I'm a TO, and I say wobbling is banned, then I need to state MY definition of what wobbling is. When a player breaks that rule, at my discretion, consequences take place, etc. etc.... How is this a discussion? @_@
I DO believe the player/s should know full well what I think is a dq'able offense(or possibly forfeit of stock/round), that's a given. But what does it ACTUALLY matter what one person deems as wobbling vs another? The technique was NAMED after Wobbles. Conversely, we could just let him decide.
For the record, I'm "pro wobbling," and I think this discussion is quite silly. Also, I'm a huge proponent of the "a player can pause, kill themselves, and continue the match at their discretion" rule for wobbling. I don't want to have to sit there for x amount of seconds and do nothing. I don't think that's healthy, personally.