Bah, guys give me some time to reply. This will be a bit long, but I wanted to address all the comments I got back and a few others.
Sensai said:
There aren't many FPSs with a good story-line, honestly. And then those that do have good stories (or 'epic' stories, like Halo), don't have decent enough gameplay to support it (IMO).
This assertation is quite wrong. Most FPS games today are quite good and story driven. Take Far Cry. The game has THE most intelligent AI in gaming for when it came out (I think HL2 was out after though) and an amazing story. I wish the terrain was a bit more fun, but the open-endedness really made the game a great experience. Sure, the bosses were a bit of a let down, but I loved sitting there contemplating how to wipe out a map of enemies with VERY limited ammo to get to an armory.
Typh said:
CK, I'd wait on the Wii if I were you. The VC hasn't lived up to its potential (yet) and the only must-have is Zelda, which you can get on the Gamecube.
The VC IS NOT and should not be a priority in the console. Nintendo really botched it, in my opinion, by not having some games ready for downloading off the bat, but regardless you aren't buying a Wii to play SNES. Though, I barely count Zelda as a Wii title since it doesn't add anything but interactivity as the port. Again, I wasn't a fan after it went to 3D.
primusfan said:
Nothing pisses me off more than when fanboys for other systems call the Wii a gimmick. Not all of the Wii games are going to be nothing but mini-games. We all know that, but I try to explain it to some of my friends (who are 360 fanboys), they assume that every game is just gonna be a WarioWare type game (i'm not saying anything bad about WarioWare, I want to get it).
Sadly, the Wii IS just a gimmick right now. Nintendo needs a good gimmick to reel in outside gamers then they really need to hit constant homeruns. Also, they need to adjust the learning curve with some games. The DS, I will admit, turned me off with the 2 screens. The fact is that once they had some compelling content, then I was interested. The main problem I saw with the DS was a lack of third party support. I can't name 5 good, worthwhile titles that wasn't under the Nintendo umbrella. Trauma Center was fun as was Castlevania, then I draw a blank. The problem with that is unless you can have exclusive third party titles that dominate, you won't reel in too many over time.
Also, I really want to see the DS more interactive with the Wii. I mean they both have the Wifi connectivity, why not use it to it's potential?
I'll admit, as of now, I am leaning hard to the PS3. It offers the best for me personally right now. The 360 always lures me when I see Dead Rising, Gears of War, and the horizon. The Wii however really offers nothing of amazing interest that I say "****, I need to play that." The Wii needs it's own "Assassin's Creed" or MGS4 or Gears of War/Resistance to lure in the gamers who will spend money.
Sadly for gamers like myself, PC gaming is no longer a cheap alternative. Vista Ultimate, the gaming version essentially, is running for about $400. Ultimate has services on it that prevent most forms of piracy and is required to upgrade to DirectX 10. Meaning in the fall, when Crysis and such hit, PC gamers will have to shell out at least $400 for the software, and maybe more for upgraded video cards, processors, etc. Well, gaming is an expensive passtime.