Diddy Kong
Smash Obsessed
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2004
- Messages
- 26,593
- Switch FC
- SW-1597-979602774
I don't want people to agree with me fully, not at all, I just want them to consider this as a strong possibility.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
^thatall of this
It's dumb by default because version exclusives are dumb and make no sense.I already did a compromise before with version exclusive 3DS Sheik, how'd y'all feel about that?
You're beginning to worry me. They had to be put on the box for legal purposes. If the box says Konami/ Sega anyway, why not put them on?I love how you guys speak on Sakurai's behalf like he's your best friend. If Sakurai didn't care about sales, why were Sonic and Snake on the back of Brawl? Obviously not to convince people to buy the game.
I rest my case.Nah, maybe they could also be used separately if Sakurai wants them to.
![]()
You clearly didn't get his point. Diddy Kong is as relevant as Sheik is for Smash 4. You can't apply a Double Standard here. Either they're both able to get in, or neither should. Also, retro are never relevant unless the character has a recent appearance. R.O.B. only got in due to Mario Kart DS with the way you put it.Diddy was relevant around Brawl's time. He appeared in all DK games sans Jungle Beat, which was hated/ not well received. Marth in fact also was relevant cause of Shadow Dragon, Ness wasn't, but original 12, Zero Suit Samus also was relevant cause of Zero Mission and I think Prime 2? And the rest are retro characters. And its for the rest not like all those characters where in fact not all more important than Sheik is to Zelda. Just ONE appearance of doing basically nothing just doesn't cut it as a character to me.
It helps that your arguments aren't doing a very good job at making us want Impa. Hell, you don't even want Impa as a whole, just some one-off version of her. If you didn't notice, in Smash itself, unless they're a separate character, they're all the same person. Samus is the same person throughout all three games. So is regular Link. So is Zelda. So is Sheik.Sheik having double the votes comes pretty much down to the fact that everyone from the thread votes for her. :/
![]()
If you need to replace an extremely popular veteran, then you're doing it wrong.It's understandable to not wanna see her go, but Impa's inclusion would perhaps be able to fix a lot of issues Zelda / Sheik had.
![]()
With how much Sakurai clearly cares about her? Yeah, don't even expect that much. Tingle isn't nearly as cool(although obviously more popular), and got an AT status.Anything can be a trophy, at the very least Impa would be an Assist Trophy.
On what grounds? Being somewhat more popular than she used to be? Hell, Toad's more popular than her(by quite a lot), and he should already be in.But I expect her to be in anyway, wether Sheik stays or not.
Most of Zelda's issues come from atrocious animation design, primarily in her air game. All of her attacks either hit too hard so you can't starts combos to build percent then kill or her moves are sweet spot based in the air which forces a lot of strain on precision for an easy to mess up move.It's understandable to not wanna see her go, but Impa's inclusion would perhaps be able to fix a lot of issues Zelda / Sheik had.
![]()
What about the Impa from The Wand of Gamelon?I could never respect Impa after the Oracle games.
![]()
I really feel this is enough reason for her to never be a character. Actually on second thought I'd really enjoy playing an Impa like this. Some sorta DK/Sheik hybrid... Alright Impa's in.