Bl@ckChris
Smash Hero
yeah shoutouts to macD for not being thought about ever for these lists lol.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
That's 'cause Marth/Sheik suck.I suck now.
The difference is that we've seen the other players you list compete at many tournaments and not repeat the same results, thus we have evidence that they are not at that level. But with Javi, he's made that run 1/1 times. Obviously the sample size isn't large enough yet to draw definitive conclusions, but that's why I'd say Javi is given more attention.I'm just saying the community did not jump on the pen1s of Fly, Shroomed, or Taj after they did similar if not better runs at similarly tough tournaments. Nobody said, "Oh my so <so-and-so> is clearly at the level of M2K!" People are actually putting Javi higher than M2K in some of these lists. Like, gimme a break.
One top player + filler. Good filler, mind you, but at least when Armada came over he had the decency to beat 2 (arguably 3) of the 4 top players at the time in one run.
The fact that he has dominated his country for the past few years doesn't hurt either.The difference is that we've seen the other players you list compete at many tournaments and not repeat the same results, thus we have evidence that they are not at that level. But with Javi, he's made that run 1/1 times. Obviously the sample size isn't large enough yet to draw definitive conclusions, but that's why I'd say Javi is given more attention.
Also, he hasn't had the benefit of competition within a major smash scene.
Shroomed and KK are getting a comparable amount of attention as Javi. Fly Aminita has a long history of being inconsistent, so much that he shouldn't be considered. I personally believe in Taj a great deal, but the fact that he is seemingly retired and more often than not plays Mewtwo at national tournaments, skews his results and any chance of forming a sensible analysis of his level.That's not true at all. Actually, Shroomed's done similarly well at every national he's been to since his Genesis run, KK's taken top 5 at the last two nationals, Fly's a top player in the strongest region in the world, and Taj has a long history of being excellent even in semi-retirement.
You made a decent sensible post. I'm impressed.LOL u guys
Mango's better at falco dittos than PP, We know this
PP might be better vs. floaties than mango. His sets vs. Armada were better than mango's done recently.
The people saying Mango's falco would body armada obviously didn't see that same falco against Hbox, or against Armada in Apex crews (small samples, but still). His puff? I'll believe it when I see it. Quit johning.
Maybe he'll get good enough before they meet again. I hope so.
wanted to vomit when i saw someone mention PP as #2
quit underrating mango you ****s
he could **** armada in a second if he pulled out puff
he's less likely but still likely to **** armada in a second if he pulls out falcon
he just WANTED to do it with fox. he failed, so what, that doesn't mean he's falling off the ****ing map. mango's #1 in my heart and #2 officially until FC when he cuts the crowd-pleasing bs (which I still enjoy) and gets #1 officially like he ****ing deserves. get the **** out with that 1. Armada 2. PP 3. Mango garbage
I don't see how mango being "better at the ditto" is relevent? Its almost as if you're implying that if mango played another character he would lose, and therefore be a worst player. But that would be a silly implication, because there's no reason for mango to do that if pp can't beat his falco. So surely that wasn't you're point.Mango's better at falco dittos than PP, We know this
PP might be better vs. floaties than mango. His sets vs. Armada were better than mango's done recently.
i 100% agree with this. and no smashers reunion was not a major ether b/c so many top players were missing and not enough of the US or Canada showed up. these r all closer to what i would call national level (but i need a better name then that b/c its misleading since Canada is usually at these).ROM isn't a major either then
right they r in a class of there own, the major class.ROM, Impulse, Big House should all be "majors" imo. Anything approaching or above 150 entrants is a major, and to say otherwise would be ridiculous imo.
Apex, Genesis, and Pound are in a class of their own for pushing ~300 entrants.
We're really just arguing semantics.right they r in a class of there own, the major class.
i feel when i call these other tourneys not majors people take it as an insult on the tourneys or like they dont mean anything which isnt true at all. but majors have all the best (or most of the best players) while these other tourneys r always missing a couple key people.
Getting one stocked by armada on FD is a REALLY, REALLY strong showing for a falco. It is better than PP has done in recent memory.The people saying Mango's falco would body armada obviously didn't see that same falco against Hbox, or against Armada in Apex crews (small samples, but still). His puff? I'll believe it when I see it. Quit johning.
My point was that mango is better in some MU's and Peepee (maybe) in others. Mango wins the head to head, but that doesn't necessarily make him "better" if Peepee beats people he can't. Now, with current evidence, sure, mango's prolly #2. But I find it hilarious that you count Mango's Gen 2 set and not his Apex set. He got 3-2'd and 3-0'd, brother. and he didn't get another chance at either because he lost to Taj and Hbox. Haven't seen PP losing to Hbox recently.I don't see how mango being "better at the ditto" is relevent? Its almost as if you're implying that if mango played another character he would lose, and therefore be a worst player. But that would be a silly implication, because there's no reason for mango to do that if pp can't beat his falco. So surely that wasn't you're point.
And how has PP's sets with armada been "better" than mangos?
PP went 0-4, 4-3, and 2-4
Mango went 2-3 in a shorter set.
seems like they do about the same to me :stupidleek:
well when the best is missing its an issue, but i mean all of Europe is missing is also a problem.We're really just arguing semantics.
And honestly, almost everyone relevant was at impulse and the ROMs, when it comes down to the top 8-16, it basically the same class of players who are at apex/genesis anyway. Unless you consider Armada attendance to be necessary for the title of "major".
He got 3-2'd and 3-0'd, brother.
I was just about to say this too, Mango's Falco did really well in Apex crews in what is probably Falco's worst stage in the matchup and the stage that's probably Mango's personal worst (I'm pretty sure I remember him saying on a tournament stream how he's not as good at FD because he doesn't laser as much).Getting one stocked by armada on FD is a REALLY, REALLY strong showing for a falco. It is better than PP has done in recent memory.
If anything, apex crews bolster the mangos falco argument.
I honestly forgot about apex, but iirc, PP also got 3-1'd by armada at that tournament. Or was it 3-2? either way, apex doesnt change my argument at all. They have done pretty much the exact same vs armada recently.My point was that mango is better in some MU's and Peepee (maybe) in others. Mango wins the head to head, but that doesn't necessarily make him "better" if Peepee beats people he can't. Now, with current evidence, sure, mango's prolly #2. But I find it hilarious that you count Mango's Gen 2 set and not his Apex set. He got 3-2'd and 3-0'd, brother. and he didn't get another chance at either because he lost to Taj and Hbox. Haven't seen PP losing to Hbox recently.
Personally, I don't see why europe being in attendance matters. They all show up and get 33rd, I don't see how that makes adds to the esteem of the tournament win for the victor. I'm not even trying to be rude or abrasive towards europe. I just think people put too much emphasis on apex/genesis and seem to think winning other tournaments "doesn't count"well when the best is missing its an issue, but i mean all of Europe is missing is also a problem.
and i guess you could say its semantics but its kinda important. like its the difference between winning Wimbledon and tennis master series Rome. both big wins but one is clearly a bigger deal then the other.
but as i said before the other tourneys do count, just not quite as much. Majors r a good/cool thing to have, they become these huge events with tons of hype (not saying rom and stuff doesnt have hype but its not as much) also picking certain tourneys as "the big ones" gives a sense of legitimacy and organization imo which is good for the community.Personally, I don't see why europe being in attendance matters. They all show up and get 33rd, I don't see how that makes adds to the esteem of the tournament win for the victor. I'm not even trying to be rude or abrasive towards europe. I just think people put too much emphasis on apex/genesis and seem to think winning other tournaments "doesn't count"
100% agreeMaybe they shouldn't count for as much as like an Apex but they're still pretty significant.
i agree with this. so even through winning one major is an indicator of a new possible best it would still take two wins before that person would be considered the best. sounds good to meI mean its like yes and no. Some people had already crowned Armada after Genesis 2 even though most waited until after Apex. I think it should've almost be viewed as though Genesis 2 signaled a potential passing of the torch, but not definite, and so let's not crown Armada yet for sure but he may be the best especially if he wins Apex. And then after Apex, yes Armada is the best in the world and probably has been since Genesis 2. I think if Mango wins a big tournament with Armada in it we should probably still view Armada as the best, but look at it as a potential indicator of hey maybe Mango's taken this back but let's reserve that judgement for more evidence.