Yuna said:
Praying is extremely situational. Also, ever heard of airdodging?
I don't think you understand what I am talking about.
Basically, you hit the opponent into the air, entice them into using their second jump, and then you jump near them and use pk thunder. Now they have a few options. If they do nothing they fall into the tail and it's over. What they want to do is air dodge, but it's not that simple because you can change the angle pk thunder 2 will go
dramatically in a
fraction of a second. After hitting Ness with pk thunder, he moves so fast that it
cannot be air dodged on reaction. That means you need to look at when pk thunder is going to hit him to do your air dodge. But get this: the direction Ness goes isn't based on the direction pk thunder is moving, it's based on where it hits Ness on his body. That means you can effectively make it look as if you are going to shoot it at one angle (requiring one air dodge timing) and then shoot at a slightly different angle (requiring a different air dodge timing). Basically, the opponent is forced to
guess the air dodge timing. If they guess wrong, they are dead... if they guess right, Ness is safe because you won't be in any position to punish him. This guessing game is in Ness's favour.
Now if you are having a hard time picturing this, it's probably because -- as I said -- you have not played a competent Ness. Unlike the earlier poster, I am not talking about hoping the opponent messes up, I am talking about forcing them to
guess an air dodge timing (or else fall into the tail and die for sure). This is NOT a novelty and it works
on a regular basis.
As for your other comments, I think they are unfair; I didn't make any "BS assumptions". I gave an accurate overview of what the chaingrab really should mean to Ness players. It isn't an auto-lose, it's a good chuck of damage, and it's far from unwinnable. Rather than whining about what Ness "could have been" or talking about banning things, I am describing the reality, and it is
not that bad. Like you, Yuna, I don't support banning this chaingrab, and that was the point of that paragraph.