Iceweasel
Smash Ace
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2015
- Messages
- 855
I don't think you know what that word means.edgy
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I don't think you know what that word means.edgy
Actually, Sora's owned by Disney, and Mickey Mouse would be much more profitable than Sora. Of course Mickey's not happening, though, even if it would be hype to see someone as iconic and legendary as him battle against the likes of Mario and Pac-Man.I think Sora would be the only other good choice, maybe Lightning too, but I feel that's a reach.
I don't think a long forgotten character who hasn't appeared in a game since his cameo in Mario and Luigi: Superstar Saga really would make that much money.But...
I wouldn't think so, seeing as he called Live and Learn edgy...I don't think you know what that word means.
Didn't know snowflakes could be so salty.Just here to restate that Final Fantasy 7 is a mediocre game. **** Cloud.
I wasn't serious when I said that. I called it edgy, as the song is usually related to Shadow the Hedgehog, a really "edgy" character.I wouldn't think so, seeing as he called Live and Learn edgy...
It's actually associated with Sonic. The song you're thinking of is "All Hail Shadow".I wasn't serious when I said that. I called it edgy, as the song is usually related to Shadow the Hedgehog, a really "edgy" character.
I should also note if I ever use the word edgy, I'm normally joking.
Even though I love the series to death, that's not all that surprising.Speaking of Final Fantasy, I can't say I'm a big fan of it. Don't get me wrong, it's cool, I just....can't get into it.
Not for long. :'((because you know, the main series has two MMOs in it)
I've actually been kinda bummed about this, but Squeenix made it clear that the game would be closing down soon when they started the Goddess Gala event way back at the start of the year.
I'd like the take a second to point out that they'd proceed to lose their mind further if you told them that wasn't even a fourth of the roster.If you showed even the list of characters to someone from twenty years ago, they'd flip out.
I don't know, but I think it's really stupid.Also why all the swordsman hate?
Even more stupid I think how some people are seriously calling Cloud an "Ike clone".
I'm still hoping for either Klonoa or Rayman to make it in.We need more 3rd parties in smash (even if we already have 5)
Pokemon most certainly was not the first series about capturing and raising monsters and it won't be the last. Hell, Shin Megami Tensei and Dragon Quest did it before Pokemon did.And Digimon came out before Pokemon, so which is the rip-off now?
Lol Geno is the most requested square Enix character since brawl and he can prints money because it would be his first time to appear In the newest generation of gaming and people were waiting for him since 19 years ago, even if some people wouldn't recognize him they would still buy him because of his moveset and his ability that other character doesn't have.I don't think a long forgotten character who hasn't appeared in a game since his cameo in Mario and Luigi: Superstar Saga really would make that much money.
i am hoping for Geno to get revealed in December they already have Cloud so why not drop the 2nd bomb from square Enix.I'm still hoping for either Klonoa or Rayman to make it in.
He may maybe the most requested, but that doesn't mean he's the most popular SE character. Cloud may not be requested, but he has a hell of a lot more star power than Geno could ever dream of.Lol Geno is the most requested square Enix character since brawl and he can prints money because it would be his first time to appear In the newest generation of gaming and people were waiting for him since 19 years ago, even if some people wouldn't recognize him they would still buy him because of his moveset and his ability that other character doesn't have.
Exactly! I get really annoyed when some Pokemon fans treat other mon series like Digimon, Monster Rancher, & Yo-Kai Watch as rip-offs even though they're completely different. I used to be like this with Digimon years ago until I watched the anime & realized that not only is it good, but it was also really different from Pokemon. Every mon series shares some of the same tropes, but they're all unique in their own way and they don't rip off each other. I respect every other mon series in the same way as I do Pokemon, and I'm a huge fan of the genre anyway.Pokemon most certainly was not the first series about capturing and raising monsters and it won't be the last. Hell, Shin Megami Tensei and Dragon Quest did it before Pokemon did.
I really wish people would stop brushing aside any and all mons games as "Pokemon rip offs."
I didn't even know what a Geno was until I started posting on this boards back in '07.Lol Geno is the most requested square Enix character since brawl and he can prints money because it would be his first time to appear In the newest generation of gaming and people were waiting for him since 19 years ago, even if some people wouldn't recognize him they would still buy him because of his moveset and his ability that other character doesn't have.
The funniest thing about the whole "Digimon is a Pokemon clone" thing is that it's utter bullcrap: It was a Tomogatchi for boys. And unless you're telling me that somehow Tomogatchi ripped off Pokemon, I don't see the connection.Exactly! I get really annoyed when some Pokemon fans treat other mon series like Digimon, Monster Rancher, & Yo-Kai Watch as rip-offs even though they're completely different. I used to be like this with Digimon years ago until I watched the anime & realized that not only is it good, but it was also really different from Pokemon. Every mon series shares some of the same tropes, but they're all unique in their own way and they don't rip off each other. I respect every other mon series in the same way as I do Pokemon, and I'm a huge fan of the genre anyway.
But Digimon and Pokemon both have "mon" in the title! And since I'm narrow minded and only know of Pokemon due to it's massive success obviously it's a rip-off since I didn't hear about it until after Pokemon came out! /sarcasmifyoucouldn'ttellThe funniest thing about the whole "Digimon is a Pokemon clone" thing is that it's utter bullcrap: It was a Tomogatchi for boys. And unless you're telling me that somehow Tomogatchi ripped off Pokemon, I don't see the connection.
He still can print money though.He may maybe the most requested, but that doesn't mean he's the most popular SE character. Cloud may not be requested, but he has a hell of a lot more star power than Geno could ever dream of.
He would, but Cloud would print more.He still can print money though.
We all know that most people would buy all the DLC characters anyway, people wants to complete the roster.He would, but Cloud would print more.
Although Geno only appears in SMRPG and made a cameo in M&LSS, I think Geno would be a unique (and underrated) character with his movesets that he can use from his only appearance. Then again he might be the 2nd Square Enix character in Smash 4 if he ever was confirmed.Unpopular opinion: I still think Geno is a highly overrated character for Smash 4 DLC. So Cloud got in. Makes sense considering how popular Final Fantasy is, plus he is one of the most iconic characters. Geno? Yeah, it totally makes sense that Squeenix would put in a one-time character from a really old game, and of whom hasn't even gotten into any of the Nintendo/Square Enix crossover games at all. So many other potental Square Enix franchises and characters, and yet people want the one who only appeared in a Mario spin-off (Plus that random Superstar Saga cameo).
Gen 4 and 5 is considered my favorite Pokemon Gens of all time. While most people praised Gen 2 for being the most favorable of all generations, I really don't like that generation for some reasons.I think that Pokemon Gens 1, 2, and 4 are awful, and Gen 5 and OR/AS are some of the better games.
I'd go as far as saying that Pokemon Black and White along with the sequels are some of my favorite games of all time.
I think OR/AS is a major improvement over Emerald in almost every way (besides the removal of the Battle Frontier).
Well, I checked Wikipedia just now and it looks like Pokemon did came out before Tamagotchi & Digimon were a thing. My question here is did Pokemon really started the whole mon genre or not? I'm seriously confused here.The funniest thing about the whole "Digimon is a Pokemon clone" thing is that it's utter bullcrap: It was a Tomogatchi for boys. And unless you're telling me that somehow Tomogatchi ripped off Pokemon, I don't see the connection.
As Finalark said, there were a few that did it before Pokemon.Well, I checked Wikipedia just now and it looks like Pokemon did came out before Tamagotchi & Digimon were a thing. My question here is did Pokemon really started the whole mon genre or not? I'm seriously confused here.
Na, Pokemon just popularized it.Well, I checked Wikipedia just now and it looks like Pokemon did came out before Tamagotchi & Digimon were a thing. My question here is did Pokemon really started the whole mon genre or not? I'm seriously confused here.
I think Disney co-owns (or maybe even fully) owns Sora. That might be something both Nintendo and Square didn't want to bother with.I think Sora would be the only other good choice, maybe Lightning too, but I feel that's a reach.
Really, moveset potential can only take a character so far, especially with so many other characters from both Mario & Square-Enix that have appeared in more games and are more popular. I'm pretty sure Geno's quite low priority for both Squeenix and Nintendo as a whole.Although Geno only appears in SMRPG and made a cameo in M&LSS, I think Geno would be a unique (and underrated) character with his movesets that he can use from his only appearance. Then again he might be the 2nd Square Enix character in Smash 4 if he ever was confirmed.
Why do you think Black Mage would have been a better choice? I think moveset potential takes a serious backseat to series representation and cultural importance in these decisions. Final Fantasy VII is generally seen as the game that made RPGs popular and viable outside of Japan, as well as helping skyrocket the PS1 to the position of best-selling console for its generation - I imagine it was a natural decision to choose that game's highly visible and recognizable protagonist as the representative for Final Fantasy and for Sony.I personally think Black Mage would been a better choice if there is going to be a FF character in Smash 4. I'm okay with Cloud since many FF7 fans want him and that Cloud is very popular in the FF franchise..
Probably because I thought Black Mage (or similarly Vivi from FFIX) could make him a character that use magic/elements attacks like Robin (minus the sword) and Zelda. I also thought that he (that was one of the classes and came in FF1 internationally) along with Cloud are iconic in the FF franchise (Cloud being the reason why JRPG and FF7 are getting really popular and that the PS1 sales skyrocketed which is what you said). While I'm sure Black Mage isn't possible of being confirmed in Smash 4 because he doesn't present of what make JRPG in general and the franchise (FF) popular, and the console's sale impact, I (and some people who are either FF fans or non FF fans) thought he could be a better choice.Why do you think Black Mage would have been a better choice? I think moveset potential takes a serious backseat to series representation and cultural importance in these decisions. Final Fantasy VII is generally seen as the game that made RPGs popular and viable outside of Japan, as well as helping skyrocket the PS1 to the position of best-selling console for its generation - I imagine it was a natural decision to choose that game's highly visible and recognizable protagonist as the representative for Final Fantasy and for Sony.