Ugh, this should be fun. I'm a worker whose criminal background check would have disqualified me from employment, but was given a chance anyways. I am a miller.
vote: Rajam
I can't remember the last time he was helpful for town... totally fine with this lynch.
I'm not seeing scum intent behind claiming miller immediately. However, I would like clarification on your vote; does your vote mean you think that Rajam would make a good D1 policy lynch?
It's kind of weird that the start of game flavour shows no pressing need to expose evil or anything. And with an even number of players, it's almost as if the mod is pointing us to No Lynch. Thoughts?
That's true that the starting flavor doesn't have any real antagonism, but that is not enough to say that the mod is pointing us toward a No Lynch, especially when I don't see how it could benefit us or how the mod would make it so a no lynch toDay would benefit us.
Really odd, yeah. Everything is made out to be peaceful and there seems not to be any problems. Of course, whether or not anyone believes the mod is pointing us to a No Lynch, I disagree with the notion. We have mod-confirmed information there is a mafia faction and there is no reason to waste the first Day phase on a No Lynch when first day lynches are valuable information.
Also not sure what to think about you claiming right off the bat. I remember how it went down in the DRoom. It really is anti-town, you know. Along with suggesting we eliminate one of the only good sources of information this Day can provide for us?
Vote: T-block
@Sokr: Give me your opinion of a NL
Are you saying that claiming right off the bat in general is anti-town, or that claiming
miller right off the bat is anti-town? Either way, what scummy motives do you think T-Block could have had with claiming miller?
Why is this so funny to me?
These are the most doing-stuff first two posts of a game I've seen in a while. Not sure what to think of claiming Miller ASAP. It's a good thing to do if you are a miller, or a ballsy thing to do if you're scum. No Lynching, however, is a dumb idea, and that would be even ballsier to suggest as scum. I think you have balls, but not that many.
Vote: July
inb4 walls of ketchup
@Kantrip: What do you think of my analysis of T-block? What are the chances of scum suggesting no lynching and immediately claiming miller?
I pretty much agree with that, and I like that T-Block came into the game pretty open and proposed the No Lynch idea even though he's taken some flack for it. I feel like something similar happened in TT and he was town there, so right now he's okay with me.
Is your vote on me to try and keep me from writing long catch-up posts, or because you are also suspicious of me?
Vote: T-Block
I'm the Illegal immigrant working in Walgreen's, I'm a miller.
Question for both T-Block and RR: Are you informed that you are the miller, or are you uninformed and just assuming based on your flavor?
The length of his claim.
I find it very unbelievable the mod would make it that long when he admitted he adde the flavor last minute.
Xiivi an Glyph have made some rather long word jumbles for claim, so I doubt Rockin woul do the same.
I don't agree with this. Anyways, how important is that to your vote on T-Block, and how much is it based on your own claim and the improbability of two millers?
Wow, action this soon in the game?
Red Ryu presents a good argument and he seems much more... into the game than in Britches and Hose in which he was scum. The RR I know from Britches and Hose wouldn't risk his neck by counterclaiming this early in the game.
Asdioh, Kantrip and July. You were in that game with me, what do you think?
I'm honestly not sure who to believe between RR and T-Block. I don't think it's probable that there are two millers, but I also see town intent behind both claims. I do agree that RR has been much more involved than he was in Britches and Hose, but I've played in other games with him where he was scum and not so reserved so I'm taking that as a null tell. I really want to hear from them if they are informed/uniformed, but atm I don't like RR's reasoning that T-Block's claim is too wordy to validate why his vote is on T-Block.
And because yours is small and simple it's also supposed to be more believable? I don't really see how that's the case
No it's not. Two millers - while unorthodox - is certainly a viable option under the right circumstances. I'm a bit shocked that you're immediately excluding options for no good reason when everything should always be considered. You say that it's not worth assuming that there are two millers in this game. I say it's not worth assuming that one of you two must be lying and that you're the one telling the truth given the arguments I've seen so far.
I absolutely agree with this. I have more to say on this but I do want to see a bit more of T-Block's response to RR and to everyone's speculation on his claim/RR's claim first.