Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
The problem is that your thoughts are scattered. The problem is that it doesn't give us an idea of your connection with other players. There is a difference between saying "I agree with Dastrn on B. I disagree with Dastrn on C" and "I agree with Dastrn on B so he's kinda town, but I disagree on C and that's a HUGE deal so overall I think he's likely to be scum" That's pro town play. Just listing a bunch of points you agree with and disagree with is blending in and allowing yourself to participate without giving town an idea how to trace your behavior to other players, ie if dastrn or you was either lynched or NK'd we'd then have something to go on.I don't see a problem with agreeing on some stuff with a player, and then disagreeing on a totally different issue with the same player. I think Dastrn says overall accepted behaviors about mafia theory like the independent behavior but I don't like his reactions at all, which bug me and seem pretty fake. I also dislike how he says "check and full-read this totally different game just to check my point"... remembers me of adumbrodeus lol
****it MK why are you claiming??I'm a jailer.
It doesn't matter if scum knows this knowledge or not =P
@Zac
Just because you did that doesn't prove you town. It just proved your ability. Why did you do that?
Wait. You couldn't reread during the Night? Can you GET any more useless? You WON'T be caught up EVER in this game if you keep at this.
Vanderzant isn't the play toDay Dastrn.
Idk whether or not to label your play as dumb or scum. @Van, your retaliation sounds like a bit of OMGUS, especially with the vote. Mind explaining why it'd be a scummy play, rather than a really dumb play?
As far as I can see, this is the only thing you have on me, aside from your "small albeit weak case". Tandora didn't boldly say that he was town, and I didn't really get any impression that she might've implied it.
Oh, by the way... I reread (Is it reRED or reread, as the past tense? It's bothering me). And I'm freakin stumped.
Thanks for explaining?
Vote: Rajam
I assume you're caught up. Who are two scum picks, and why?
Rajam, you're completely removing yourself from any current activity by catching up so slowly. I hope you realize this, catch up much faster, and ACTUALLY contribute to an issue that ISN'T dead.
J brings up a probable point...
But Rajam should still be able to answer the question.
Some random thoughtsNinja'd.
That explains that.
Vand, I'm not worried about it at all. I wouldn't be doing this if I wasn't completely certain that scum can't touch me lol. Trust me, you're making it out to be way bigger of a deal than it is.Geez I want to digitally slap you right now. As you would of noticed if you'd been reading my posts carefully I was quite happy to just leave it as you "claiming" tracker. Maybe I'm overestimating your skill, but claiming doc/jailer is something you should never do as town. By any means, I'll be surprised if scum don't kill you. If you're not night killed tonight then you're basically auto scum in my books... Today we can still be friends unless there is a counter-claim, but wow >.>
soo... which ones are honest? can you actually venture an opinion rather than just pointing out posts, I suggest you start doing this soon, before you dieI guess the most important would be to check those "seems disconnected with" and judge if they're honest or not. I think they all are and that's why I wrote them
...
This isn't actually an answer to what I asked you, Why did you think you're little 'summary' was more likely affect him than all of the pressure he had yesterDay@x-1 - Yup. I focused on him pretty exclusively. I'm disappointed that nothing anyone does can force a reaction out of Rajam. He isn't giving us his feelings on anything, or building a case in any direction. I wanted to prod him a bit with my summary of his ... summary... and then vote vand to get some reactions. I'm being transparent in the fact that my play is more pressure-y than standard play this game. I'm really disappointed that the right people aren't responding.
Y'know, outrageous thought but perhaps its scum doing it??? and they know that its anti-town, and they're doing it on purpose? C'mon man seriously, you might as well ask if the scum will admit it for the benefit of town@ All - Who is forcing the votes? I agree that it's anti-town. If I'm the play, then I'll be the play. But forcing a vote on me when we don't know WHO the play is really sucks. If the vote-forcer wanted to change targets from me to someone else, he just removed Rajam from being able to swing with the wagon if we had a good wagon. You'd have to want me dead REGARDLESS OF ALIGNMENT to force that vote. That's flat-out anti-town. Even if you think my play has been anti-town, it's SO anti-town to force the vote this early in a day with no wagon. You removed town's ability to be flexible.
emphasis mine.@x1 sounds like you agree with me that only scum would force that vote. I have a hard time seeing them use a day ability this early on a day with no wagon on me unless they either already voted for me or were going to very soon. That power HAS to be used near in time to a wagon or attempted wagon in order to be effective.
Therefore, either someone who already voted for me or tried to build momentum on me immediately after. And that person is scum.
Why did you think you're little 'summary' was more likely affect him than all of the pressure he had yesterDay
Bioware: http://www.smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=284997@Sir Bed I was really annoyed at you at the end of the Day, because you only posted like 10 times but I like what you've said so far toDay. I think I asked you this yesterDay so sorry to repeat myself, but what game were you scum in?
If we told Xsy to vig Rajam and he didn't/there was only 1 NK N1, we would lynch Xsy either D2 or D3. We wouldn't be leaving someone who is either A) mafia or B) completely useless due to RBs, alive. Yes, if Xsy was scum, we would have been a little bit uninformed and our D1 (PLAYER) and D2 (XSYVEN) lynches would likely been collectively worse than our D1 (XSYVEN) and D2 (PLAYER) lynches, but I feel that the risk/reward for Xsy being not-mafia/RBed was VERY worth the possibility of him being mafia/RBed (statistically, we get 1.5 more kills under townie's control with vig/mafia/lynches than we would with just mafia/lynches).Also as a hypothetical, say we told Tanny to kill Rajam last night, and toDay we find that there was only 1 kill (zen). Are we any better off than we would of been lynching Xsy? It just creates a big level of WIFOM that we have no idea how to handle. I can understand if you didn't actually find Xsy scummy, but I did, and I feel like we would just be second guessing ourselves the entire time if he/tanny were still around.
That is not Gord's tell lol.Contrary to popular opinion, I think Gord is town. He says silly things but I see them mostly as null tells of a player who just "posts before they think" so to speak. I usually expect scum to be ALOT more calculated/cautious with what they say.
Did you just vote the confirmed townie?!?!?!?!
EBWOP: Wow... read it wrong...
I know you've already sorta flipped on this and are already on Gord's case, but uh...more fuel for the fire I guess?GorditoBoy69, Robotnik, Mafiosi Beloved Princess has been lynched!
Answer my questionsMK, you skipped a step. Try saying "dastrn what do you think of gordito?" You're making an EXTREMELY tenuous connection based on the lack of interaction. When I have something to say about gordito, ill say it. He hasn't given us much to interact with today. I've given plenty for him to bring up, add everyone in this game knows I'm playing weird this game.
Honestly, I hope you get CC'ed because your play has been mad weak today. day 1 too.
PLEASE tell me you read it wrong...Calling it right now. Scum is at least gord and dastrn. They are playing way too "look the other way" on each other that is so blatantly, painfully obvious.
"Well iuno loool I kant rly essplain why I tink dastrn iznt skum in a way dat u gaiz could understand". Lol bull**** dude! The way you explain it is the fact that, as your scum buddy, you are obligated to protect him. Otherwise, if you cannot think of a reason for your protection of dastrn, then why are you defending him.
Usually, when somebody says that they're TOO thought out, it means that they're trying to LIE.Can't really explain in a way that you guys would get it, but his posts seem too thought out.
Yea. Saying that I'm DEFINITELY protecting his scummy actions.Like, I can picture him being scum
Overanalyitical. OVERANALYTICAL. When are people usually overanalytical? When they're trying to come up with bulls*** that they want to make sense.and overanalytical about the whole thing.
Actions speak louder than words. You don't have to be like "I THINK X ABOUT PERSON A, AND THATS MY STANCE" for me to gauge how you've been responding to certain instances, certain events, certain scenarios, but not others.MK, you skipped a step. Try saying "dastrn what do you think of gordito?"
Not a defense. Not an excuse. Just you admitting that you play badly and have been an asset to scum thus far, if not scum yourself?You're making an EXTREMELY tenuous connection based on the lack of interaction. When I have something to say about gordito, ill say it. He hasn't given us much to interact with today. I've given plenty for him to bring up, add everyone in this game knows I'm playing weird this game.
Lemme just point this out for everyone to read.Honestly, I hope you get CC'ed because your play has been mad weak today. day 1 too.
Typing in caps puts a different emphasis vs the other words. That's all. Some use bold, some use italics. I use caps.
Typing in caps puts a different emphasis vs the other words.
a different emphasis vs the other words.
vs the other words.
other words.
Are you emphasizing every word in this sentence? Cuz I see no difference between the shouting, panicking emphasis on the WHOLE (<--see? This is how you do it) sentence, rather than...the specific words that you claim to be emphasizing over the others lol.MY SCUMLIST IS RAJAM AND DASTRN, IN ORDER OF PREFERENCE OF PLAY, AND I DON'T LIKE THE FACT THAT I CAN'T SEEM TO GET A READ FROM J.
I think I said I wanted to lynch you yesterDay? Well same reasons there. Everything you do just gives me this fake vibe. All your pushes just look so opportunistic. You seem to be flying under everyone's radar, which I don't like either.@Vand:
Why have I suddenly become one of the options of toDay's play? I haven't seen any reasoning from you about that
People want Rajam gone for what he is NOT doing rather than what he IS doing. Rajam does play this type of game as town. He's not one to post excessively when it's not to his benefit to post. He posts long PbPa's, and sometimes they are useful, sometimes you get lazy people that are just like "tl;dr contribute more!'.Well then... consider emotions gone.
Now, MK, now that we have that whole thing settled, I'd like you to try to convince me why we should lynch Dastrn over Rajam. Sure, I'd like them both gone within the next two Days. But I think that Rajam is a better choice than Dastrn overall, for reasons already explained. What makes you think Dastrn > Rajam.
I'm STRONGLY suspicious of Gordito right now. Everything sounds phony to me. The whole "i can't IMAGINE" why anyone would target smargaret" bit is unconvincing. Town would speculate, and ask questions. Scum trying to LOOK town would feign that they don't understand the night kill just to try to subtly appear as if they didn't do it themselves.
@Cello, post #378 didn't sound genuine to me at all.
@Cello, also, we'd like to hammer today if we've got a clear play, which I think we will. If you trust your town read on us, you should let us hammer. We had talked (Xatres and I), about ninja'ing your hammer but I was at work when the opportunity arose, and couldn't check the thread at the time (although I do frequently check it at work on some days) and Xatres wasn't sure about making such a bold move in his first game. Our read on you is Town all the way, and we feel the hammer is safe in your hands, but that doesn't mean you necessarily are the best hammerer without some careful discussion.
I want the roleclaim FAST. I don't want it 2 days from now.
@J claim. Explain how you've strategized based on your role. Fast.
I think the play is actually Gordito today. Remember yesterDay, when the J lynch would have gone through easily, and we (xatres and I) stopped it, pointed out that joanbud was actively being scummy while J was just being passively anti-town? Well, I am getting that same impression from Gordito.
J's inactivity has been anti-town, yes. but other than his inactivity, I don't honestly think he's been scummy in particular.
Xatres and I really think that Gordito and nicholas are the last 2 scum. nicholas has been scum-inactive. It's not just flat out inactivity. It's just avoiding ruffling feathers, staying mostly quiet, not contributing anything of substance that could be a scumslip, and riding the J wagon.
From Oddworld Day 2. Dastrn is seriously a COMPLETELY different person here. We should lynch him.Also, Gordito has dodged all of the pressure I've put on him toDay, but was careful to offer me a chance to hammer. He's paying attention to what I'm saying, but responding to it when we have an actively rolling wagon would distract from the potential mislynch of J that he has been pushing for so adamantly.
He knows that the mislynch and extreme pressure would be excusable because we've ALL been on the J wagon for TWO days. He could get away with pushing that mislynch by saying "oh well we trimmed the fat...still a pro-town move..."
Oh wait. He did say that.