Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Someone should tell Sakurai!Least popular opinion in Smash history: Not every Smash related topic has to turn into a Fire Emblem topic.
Should I pretend this was funny?Someone should tell Sakurai!
Agreed. Personally I feel like solving the issue isn't cutting the offenders, it's simply not adding those kinds of fighters again and instead focusing on better choices.Robin and Corrin have the most unique move sets of the Fire Emblem characters, and to possibly suggest cutting them before dealing with Roy and Chrom is completely absurd. Cutting those two would fix so many problems with the Fire Emblem reception and reduce it's place as a scapegoat. I'd be perfectly fine with the core Fire Emblem roster being Marth, Ike, Robin, and Corrin as they all bring unique play styles to the game despite technically all using swords. Lucina I'll allow as long as we have Echoes and I really think Fire Emblem needs female representation given how many prevalent female characters are in the series.
I know Roy has been eternally popular for...some reason, but he's by far the weakest link on the entire roster. Cutting him and his Echo opens up the door potentially for a more interesting Fire Emblem character to join without as much backlash/also just helps people who are convinced Fire Emblem's place on the roster is some giant travesty.
And I ****ing hate cuts, but Roy is basically the main one I'm willing to allow outside of one of our additional clone Links.
That's not an unpopular opinion, but you deserve a like for that.Super Smash Bros is a video game and should be played for fun and entertainment
Are you playing on easy?World of Light is the least fun way to play the game. So many of the "Challenges" are completely stupid, and so unfair, that I can't imagine anyone ever wanting to play them unless they're a masochist.
Ive seen people ask for Ridley and King K Rool since many years ago just to see them cry when their spots got taken over by Fire Emblem characters.Least popular opinion in Smash history: Not every Smash related topic has to turn into a Fire Emblem topic.
Because people wanted one character and didn't get them? That sounds incredibly petty and childish, but I guess it's unexpected or uncommon behavior from Smash fandom.Ive seen people ask for Ridley and King K Rool since many years ago just to see them cry when their spots got taken over by Fire Emblem characters.
I am not even interested in Ridley or King K Rool but even i wanted to see them atleast added on DLC, like Mewtwo, but then Corrin happened and i just shook my head.
Guess thats why every topic about opinions gotta include FE negativity:D
Trust me, i hate pointless whining myself.Because people wanted one character and didn't get them? That sounds incredibly petty and childish, but I guess it's unexpected or uncommon behavior from Smash fandom.
We got both Fire Emblem characters and iconic characters in the last game. Same with this game. There are literally two characters of a difference.The smash devs went a dangerous path in Smash4 with these FE characters. There is almost no attention to any FE character in this game now, and instead, we are getting very iconic characters that other universes like Samus universe needed in the roster.
Even though I am not a FE fan. Series never clicked with me. I really liked TMS #FE. I would have loved to see some of the Mirage versions of FE characters playable in Ultimate. They look way more interesting than standard FE fighters.Not that unpopular but there are too many FE characters with swords. The FE games have so many different weapon types that it's sad that they couldn't have even included even one axe or spear user in the ENTIRE GAME.
Maybe it's because most of the main characters have swords?Not that unpopular but there are too many FE characters with swords. The FE games have so many different weapon types that it's sad that they couldn't have even included even one axe or spear user in the ENTIRE GAME.
What people are trying to say it that's its stupid that we're getting so many lame Fire Emblem fighters when there were clearly better choices they could have made.We got both Fire Emblem characters and iconic characters in the last game. Same with this game. There are literally two characters of a difference.
Its pretty interesting how people are asking for Waluigi all the time, even as a clone, yet he gets ignored and they rather put third party characters and characters not even existing in the game.What people are trying to say it that's its stupid that we're getting so many lame Fire Emblem fighters when there were clearly better choices they could have made.
That really wouldn't work. If anything, Blaziken would be a faster Falcon, not a slow one.Wait...
What if we gave Blaziken Ganondorf's old moveset?
There's actually a really simple explanation: Sakurai likes Fire Emblem. Hey, nothing wrong with that.Its pretty interesting how people are asking for Waluigi all the time, even as a clone, yet he gets ignored and they rather put third party characters and characters not even existing in the game.
And there is not much love for Kirby. Isnt Kirby the creation of Sakurai? Why is there like 3 only? I am still quite puzzled that there are 7 FE characters in the roster. My guess is that Fire Emblem is massively popular in Japan, more popular than Kirby or many other universes in Nintendo.
Blaziken would be slower than Captain Falcon, but not as slow as Ganondorf. However, Blaziken would be a fantastic jumper.That really wouldn't work. If anything, Blaziken would be a faster Falcon, not a slow one.
Fire Emblem can barely sell when it's not a free game in comparison to most other major Nintendo first parties (and even some third parties) so it's clear that they hold the series to a much lower standard as a result. That's why we have three lame Marth clones and an even worse advertisement fighter. Although it's still ridiculous that the series has more fighters than Kirby and DK combined and Zelda. Like, is this a joke?Its pretty interesting how people are asking for Waluigi all the time, even as a clone, yet he gets ignored and they rather put third party characters and characters not even existing in the game.
And there is not much love for Kirby. Isnt Kirby the creation of Sakurai? Why is there like 3 only? I am still quite puzzled that there are 7 FE characters in the roster. My guess is that Fire Emblem is massively popular in Japan, more popular than Kirby or many other universes in Nintendo.
I hope Nintendo consider giving out some roster spots, atleast 3-4 of them for Nintendo Europé/America so that they can discuss them with their audience outside Japan, because Nintendo is selling very well by now.
Donkey Kong just got a newcomer, what are you talking about?Fire Emblem can barely sell when it's not a free game in comparison to most other major Nintendo first parties (and even some third parties) so it's clear that they hold the series to a much lower standard as a result. That's why we have three lame Marth clones and an even worse advertisement fighter. Although it's still ridiculous that the series has more fighters than Kirby and DK combined and Zelda. Like, is this a joke?
I have no clue why Kirby hasn't had a newcomer in a decade. There is no decent explanation. Literally every other major series has either had a newcomer or a returning veteran since Brawl, and yet here we are. It's obvious that Sakurai favors the Kirby games he made over modern Kirby games, which means he doesn't have as much material he's willing to work with as other series, but it's still outrageous that we haven't seen any new decent Kirby content since 2008.
Fire Emblem is more popular in Japan than it is in the west but you would by lying if you said it was more popular than Super Mario, Zelda, or Kirby on a global or Japanese scale.
Personally I don't see any excuse for the inclusion of and I'm still disappointed how turned out (why did you do this to the precious child).
And for the record, "X is unique so they deserve to be in" is a **** argument.
I really don't see any excuse why Fire Emblem has more than four fighters or why Kirby, DK and Zelda have been left in the dust for a while.
Yeah. Because Fire Emblem Awakening and Fire Emblem Fates sold so badly.Fire Emblem can barely sell when it's not a free game in comparison to most other major Nintendo first parties (and even some third parties) so it's clear that they hold the series to a much lower standard as a result.
Yea I agree with you, DK is good for all intents and purposes now with K Rool, although it is a shame Dixie never made it because she definitely deserved itDonkey Kong just got a newcomer, what are you talking about?
If anything, Blaziken / Captain Falcon would be much like Fox and Falco. Clearly based on each other, yet their distinct differences in stats and playstyle. Blaziken wouldn't be AS fast, though Speed Boost could make that happen still. His Specials would function much the same, maybe more power even, and super armor? I dunno. I forgot about Blaziken as soon as Incineroar came, because I wouldn't want yet another fire starter at this exact moment.That really wouldn't work. If anything, Blaziken would be a faster Falcon, not a slow one.
I said in comparison. Don't take me out of context.Yeah. Because Fire Emblem Awakening and Fire Emblem Fates sold so badly.
If you mean being left in the dust, I see your point. But IMO King K. Rool should have been in the Smash 4 base game (and on that note the perfect Smash 4 would have zero clones), and we could have gone for another newcomer this time around if that were the case. 3 fighters for arguably one of Nintendo's most iconic series just feels like an afterthought.Donkey Kong just got a newcomer, what are you talking about?
Even though ATs are becoming increasingly more complex, I feel as though if they were never included, we'd only have 1-2, maybe even 3 in Ultimate's case, more newcomers per game. Which I'm sure many would still accept depending on who the characters are, but still. Hell the resources not spent on ATs might even go to more items/Poke Ball Pokemon.I wish assist trophies didn't exist. I find a lot of them to be over-powered, or incredibly annoying (Nintendog). On top of that, while I can't say for sure, looking at the amount of effort put into some of these ATs makes me feel like some of them could've been actual characters rather than ATs. Like, some of them straight up have final smashes, as well as things like dodging & jumping animations. Something tells that if we didn't get a bunch of half complete characters as ATs they probably could've been full fledged fighters.