Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Really? I find the Underground part more visually appealing. And it has that fantastic Super Mario Land Underground remix.I hated Mushroomy Kingdom in Brawl, but now that it has returned to 3DS without the underground level, I'm all peachy with it.
The low ceiling combined with the section of roof blocks, you know? Not a good combination. Also, Mushroomy Kingdom had to get rid of the transformations. I don't usually mind transforming stages, but making a stage both a scrolling and transforming one is overkill.Really? I find the Underground part more visually appealing. And it has that fantastic Super Mario Land Underground remix.
That being said, I still despise the stage...
Thank you Sakurai, we understand your KI bias very well now.-Smash 3DS is a fantastic game trying to get out of a console it doesn't belong on. It should never have been made and all dev time should have been focused on the Wii U Version. It would have been better and OUT by now.
-Ridley's role as a Stage Boss for Pyropshere is the only thing he should ever be,
-should have only been a single costume, not 8 separate costumes.
- and were awful, ****ty character choices and I'm kind of mad about them to this day, when we could have had characters like Issac or Wonder Red instead. I would have even prefferred the return of rather than DUCK HUNT. The character that people remember for one mildly annoying character trait 20 years ago.
-I will never accept another Smash game without and on the roster.
- Should have had his own moveset incorporating his staff and some other weapons like Blades and Palms, BUT I'm actually pretty okay with how he was handled. It's very clear to me that he was made as a costume with alternate voice clips and particle effects, but they realized his Final Smash would have to be different than Pit's, as he never uses the 3ST and never would.
-I will never accept another Smash game without ,, on the roster
- is another dumb character choice.
- should have been removed in Brawl why is he still here
-why is still here also
- is awesome. I'm glad he's still around.
- has cool alt costumes, but at least a few of them should have had his goggles.
I sincerely hope that this is actually a popular opinion, otherwise I am disappointed in the smash bros community.I don't ever wanna see Vocaloid girl in Smash Bros.
Yeah, I kinda wtf'd at that post too. Are they commonly requested as newcomers or something? o 3oI sincerely hope that this is actually a popular opinion, otherwise I am disappointed in the smash bros community.
Your purple text is hard to read on this very dark background.Yeah, I kinda wtf'd at that post too. Are they commonly requested as newcomers or something? o 3o
Anyways, on topic:
I don't like very many hero characters and I don't understand all the collective hate towards villains and how everyone's against them being in.
For that matter I don't understand why you'd be against any character getting in. You aren't forced to play as them unless you're hardcore completionist who wants to beat every mode with every character, etc.
As a competitive player, I don't mind the gimmicky stages when just playing for fun. In fact, there are a few stage bans here and there that I find unjust to this day.
I agree completely. I love Dark Pit! And there's no way you could convince me that he's not important enough to be placed on the roster.Dark Pit needs to come back in the next one, but completely decloned with claws and the Staff. I hope there's another Kid Icarus game before then to further flesh out his character.
Yeah, I dunno. I think the Inklings are cool, and I think Splatoon looks super fun and adorable, but I think the big issue with them is that the whole game us about PAINTING things. I can't really imagine that the Dev team could find an adequate way to incorporate that concept into the character.I feel that the demand for Inklings DLC is biased as "relevant DLC character discussion" is a subjective opinion as you lock a thread for not seeing them as "relevant" but other threads are just fine? Sometimes there's no given reason for locking a thread at all. People only want to discuss their hopes and dreams for DLC and not bashing others as DLC allows room for everyone. I'm terribly disappointed with how Smashboards is handling DLC discussion.
As stated he was gonna be a costume for Pit that had alternate voice clips and particle effects, but felt that he wouldnt use Pit's Three Sacred Treasures as a Final Smash, so they clonified him.I'm glad Dark Pit is a clone and not a character they actually spent a lot of development time on.
The Splatoon character could be easily done in SSB4. Just add it shooting ink everywhere and it'd B moves about temporarily turning into a squid to attack and all done (or something even better). If Nintendo wanted this they could make it happen. The dev team Sakurai have could easily put this into SSB if they wanted too.Yeah, I dunno. I think the Inklings are cool, and I think Splatoon looks super fun and adorable, but I think the big issue with them is that the whole game us about PAINTING things. I can't really imagine that the Dev team could find an adequate way to incorporate that concept into the character.
I still think Issac should be DLC though and I'll never give up. It seems fairly likely to me too. In fact, if someone made a petition I'll bet it'd have more than enough signatures. Although I would feel bad for piling more unexpected work onto Sakurai and his crew. But I really want my damn Earth-Shaking Adept.
Well there's we agree to disagree. I don't really think he needs any serious time put in him, in fact I find that him being a clone is hilarious.As stated he was gonna be a costume for Pit that had alternate voice clips and particle effects, but felt that he wouldnt use Pit's Three Sacred Treasures as a Final Smash, so they clonified him.
I'm fine with it too, but next time he should definitley use his staff, a blade, and some claws in his arsenal instead.
I think Dark Pit even in the game at all is hilarious.Well there's we agree to disagree. I don't really think he needs any serious time put in him, in fact I find that him being a clone is hilarious.
Before the Gematsu leak, Lucina was practically immediately written off by most due to her similarities to Marth, ironically enough. Chrom was always a more popular choice. Even Robin was. Out of the three protagonists, Lucina arguably was the least talked about or desirable addition.I think Lucina was more popular then Chrom prior to the Gematsu "leak".
People tend to sway towards likely characters when information rises to support their inclusion.
But ya, could have been bias too.
Incorrect. In Japan Lucina is huge, and in all regions is unmistakably the face of Fire Emblem awakening, since this mysterious "Marth" was so heavily advertised.Before the Gematsu leak, Lucina was practically immediately written off by most due to her similarities to Marth, ironically enough. Chrom was always a more popular choice. Even Robin was. Out of the three protagonists, Lucina arguably was the least talked about or desirable addition.
I'm fairly sure, especially given the way Viridi delivers the line, that it is a very tongue in cheek, intentional joke about how the game has several clone characters, one of which WORKS for the character in question, AND with the dev team understanding well that fans don't like clone characters. It's A JOKE. As if to say: "YEAH wouldn't it be dumb if there were two characters who were super similar?? *pushes Dark Pit out of frame*"Been a while since I posted here.
- The Robin Guidance is proof that Sakurai is hypocritical when it comes to certain characters, no two ways about it.
I don't really see how that would work. They would have to craft some sort of particle effect that makes things painted a certain color when it's hit. You may think that it'd just be a projectile character who does damage but you KNOW Sakurai would wanna make sure that it splattered actual paint all over the battlefield.The Splatoon character could be easily done in SSB4. Just add it shooting ink everywhere and it'd B moves about temporarily turning into a squid to attack and all done (or something even better). If Nintendo wanted this they could make it happen. The dev team Sakurai have could easily put this into SSB if they wanted too.
Issac is only good is there is a game he can advertise for. If he has no reason to be advertised in SSB4, then he has no reason to be in SSB4 at all.
I don't know, man. They're shapeshifters with paintball guns and warping abilities. If you ask me, they're an absolute LOCK for Smash 5 a few years down the road, assuming Splatoon does well.Yeah, I dunno. I think the Inklings are cool, and I think Splatoon looks super fun and adorable, but I think the big issue with them is that the whole game us about PAINTING things. I can't really imagine that the Dev team could find an adequate way to incorporate that concept into the character.
I haven't wanted to spoil the game, so I haven't seen any of Paultena's Guidance, but what's wrong with Robin's? Just curious.Been a while since I posted here.
- The Robin Guidance is proof that Sakurai is hypocritical when it comes to certain characters, no two ways about it.
I won't say too much, but basically Viridi and Palutena imply that Chrom is too similar to Ike, and that's why he wasn't chosen as a fighter.I haven't wanted to spoil the game, so I haven't seen any of Paultena's Guidance, but what's wrong with Robin's? Just curious.
This is why my unpopular opinion is that using the forums to gauge what characters are wanted doesn't work all that well.Before the Gematsu leak, Lucina was practically immediately written off by most due to her similarities to Marth, ironically enough. Chrom was always a more popular choice. Even Robin was. Out of the three protagonists, Lucina arguably was the least talked about or desirable addition.