Mushroomguy12
Smash Hero
The only two female villains we have are a costume
and an echo
. Would be nice to have one with a full 8 costumes and unique moveset.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
The thing about Corrin, is that having to go out of the way to select the female variant affects people's perception of the character. It's the "Alph problem" that was discussed earlier:Moving on to your argument about Corrin, I don't think anyone here sees your point that having the male as the default costume makes them "primarily male." Yes, the male costume is the default costume for Corrin, Robin, and Villager. But I ask these questions:
With all this in mind, I don't see how anyone could possibly uphold the argument that having the default costume be male makes the character as a whole any more male than female. It's a pointless argument and for your sake I suggest you stop using it. Besides, it's been established that even if the characters in question are male over female, that doesn't edit the status quo in any way. It's true that Corrin is male by default, but that doesn't make them "primarily male" in any way. That implies that as a character, Corrin is overall more male than female, but that's simply not true.
- Does having the male costume be the default make the character any more masculine? No.
- Does having the male costume be the default make the character any less feminine? No.
- Does having the male costume be the default affect anyone's decision making in their preferred costume? No.
- Does having the male costume be the default take away from the appeal of the female costume? No.
- Does having the male costume be the default change or take away anything at all from the female costume? No.
- Does having the male costume be the default change the fact that there are equal male and female costumes? No.
- Does having the male costume be the default mean the developers were "pro-male" biased? No.
- Does having the male costume be the default mean the developers were biased against females? No.
- Do the developers even care whether or not the default costume is male or female? Probably not.
- Do more people still choose the female costume over the male? Yes (myself included).
While I personally have issues with not counting dual gender characters who are male on the CSS, Alph is a real good example of how that can negatively affect a character's perception, I admit. Almost nobody puts Alph in Smash fanart, and even fanart that showcases, like, all 7 Koopalings and sometimes the first female Villager and male Inkling, will still leave out Alph, as a result.
Poor kid. Make him an Echo Fighter already.
That's literally intersectionality and it's a really good thing.We're also lacking female villains. I nominate Medusa and Captain Syrup to start.
Gender ratio tends to be towards how the audiences gravitate to a character. It is a problem for some, considering that there are many possible female candidates that ARE fun to play.Gender Ratio is not a problem in Smash. It’s about whether or not the character is fun to play. Not filling some fan-made Quota.
I see your point, but Corrin's kind of an exception. Almost nobody I know likes the male version and all I see, everywhere, is female Corrin.The thing about Corrin, is that having to go out of the way to select the female variant affects people's perception of the character. It's the "Alph problem" that was discussed earlier:
Sarah Kerrigan, Grunty, and Carmen Sandiego, if we're talking 3rd parties.We're also lacking female villains. I nominate Medusa and Captain Syrup to start.
No wonder they used the female variant as the default for FE Warriors...though probably this was when Fates is quite established already.I see your point, but Corrin's kind of an exception. Almost nobody I know likes the male version and all I see, everywhere, is female Corrin.
That may just be me, though.
Is pressing the triggers to swap alternate costumes really going out of one's way? It takes two seconds to find the alt you want.The thing about Corrin, is that having to go out of the way to select the female variant affects people's perception of the character. It's the "Alph problem" that was discussed earlier:
I'm not saying she should wait because of rules, it's mostly just personal preference that I would rather have other third party characters before her. (Sorry if this wasn't portrayed well in my original post, my bad!)And before Ryu was added it was unheard of to get two characters from the same company. And before Richter was added it was unheard of to get two characters from the same 3rd Party series. The point is that rules are broken all the time and I'm confidant Chun-Li (and maybe Tails) will be the first of the unique characters from a pre-existing 3rd Party.
I agree with everything in your post except for Mega Man and Mr Game and Watch. They're both clearly being labeled as him. Labeling them as nonbinary, especially Mega Man, seems to be equally grasping at straws as putting BK in mostly male. Just my opinion thoDespite being called "Mega Man," Mega Man was placed in the nonbinary category since it is a robot
Like others have said, changing the alt isn't hard at all and takes zero effort, so this doesn't seem like an issue and is hardly "going out of the way".The thing about Corrin, is that having to go out of the way to select the female variant affects people's perception of the character. It's the "Alph problem" that was discussed earlier:
I'd have to classify Mega Man as male too. Often in the games they use the male pronouns when refering to him within the dialogue, even by his in-game creator Dr. Light. I mean, look at Roll. She clearly has feminine features but I haven't seen anyone call her genderless. Same thing about the in-game pronouns apply to her too.I agree with everything in your post except for Mega Man and Mr Game and Watch. They're both clearly being labeled as him. Labeling them as nonbinary, especially Mega Man, seems to be equally grasping at straws as putting BK in mostly male. Just my opinion tho
It mostly depends on the likeness, as they're often designed quite ambiguously. You have for example, Alisa from Tekken 7 who is a robot but is identified as female. You have SFV Seth who's a male-coded AI inside a female body. Then you have our home ROB who's technically just a basic nongendered robot design.I guess the question is, are all robots by default genderless? And if that's the case, where does KOS-MOS stand?
I agree. By this logic, we should categorize Mega Man in the male category. Nothing ambiguous about him when he literally has the word 'Man' in his name.It mostly depends on the likeness, as they're often designed quite ambiguously. You have for example, Alisa from Tekken 7 who is a robot but is identified as female. You have SFV Seth who's a male-coded AI inside a female body. Then you have our home ROB who's technically just a basic nongendered robot design.
I could say that KOS-MOS is designed and identified as female in-series, and that's a consideration.
That is so.I agree. By this logic, we should categorize Mega Man in the male category. Nothing ambiguous about him when he literally has the word 'Man' in his name.
I'm being literal here. Yes, both Mega Man and G&W are personfied using male pronouns, but Mega Man is a robot and thus has no gender and G&W is....something. We don't really know what G&W is and whether or not he has a gender. The only reason I put PAC-MAN is the male category is because we know that he's a male because of the existence of Ms. PAC-MAN. If Smash were to introduce a "Ms. Game-and-Watch," then I'll concede. Fair enough though overall, I can see why Mega Man is viewed as male.I agree with everything in your post except for Mega Man and Mr Game and Watch. They're both clearly being labeled as him. Labeling them as nonbinary, especially Mega Man, seems to be equally grasping at straws as putting BK in mostly male. Just my opinion tho
Genuinely curious but if this is the case, would KOS-MOS fall on your list under genderless assuming she were to get in?I'm being literal here. Yes, both Mega Man and G&W are personfied using male pronouns, but Mega Man is a robot and thus has no gender
Well Mega Man has Splash Woman and Roll and other female robots in his game so I don’t see how that’s different from Ms. Pac Man.I'm being literal here. Yes, both Mega Man and G&W are personfied using male pronouns, but Mega Man is a robot and thus has no gender and G&W is....something. We don't really know what G&W is and whether or not he has a gender. The only reason I put PAC-MAN is the male category is because we know that he's a male because of the existence of Ms. PAC-MAN. If Smash were to introduce a "Ms. Game-and-Watch," then I'll concede. Fair enough though overall, I can see why Mega Man is viewed as male.
Yep. Although like I said, I see the female appeal since she's personified as female.Genuinely curious but if this is the case, would KOS-MOS fall on your list under genderless assuming she were to get in?
Because Mega Man is a robot. There is nothing biological about him, unless I'm horribly mistaken. And if something isn't alive, they can't have a real gender. They can certainly be personified as one of the two sexes, but in a literal sense, they are neither male nor female.Well Mega Man has Splash Woman and Roll and other female robots in his game so I don’t see how that’s different from Ms. Pac Man.
It still seems just as much like grasping at straws. We have no reason to believe Mr Game and Watch is anything but male, considering he is "Mr" Game and Watch and is referred to by male pronouns. There are characters that appear on Flat Zone that are clearly meant to be female, even if they're not called "Ms Game and Watch".I'm being literal here. Yes, both Mega Man and G&W are personfied using male pronouns, but Mega Man is a robot and thus has no gender and G&W is....something. We don't really know what G&W is and whether or not he has a gender. The only reason I put PAC-MAN is the male category is because we know that he's a male because of the existence of Ms. PAC-MAN. If Smash were to introduce a "Ms. Game-and-Watch," then I'll concede. Fair enough though overall, I can see why Mega Man is viewed as male.
Nothing official but there's fan art galore for such a concept. Would make a great echo fighter. If Ms. Pac Man ever got in it would be fun to see both of the oldest characters in Smash get their Minnie Mouse equivalents.If Smash were to introduce a "Ms. Game-and-Watch," then I'll concede.
idk about you but I dont normaly go around calling woman MrI'm being literal here. Yes, both Mega Man and G&W are personfied using male pronouns, but Mega Man is a robot and thus has no gender and G&W is....something.
She's adorable and I want her to be canonNothing official but there's fan art galore for such a concept. Would make a great echo fighter. If Ms. Pac Man ever got in it would be fun to see both of the oldest characters in Smash get their Minnie Mouse equivalents.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
What a cool design. I'd make an OC outta this.Nothing official but there's fan art galore for such a concept. Would make a great echo fighter. If Ms. Pac Man ever got in it would be fun to see both of the oldest characters in Smash get their Minnie Mouse equivalents.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Whoever made this, thank you. You make me wanna use Mr. G&W one day. #3FramesNothing official but there's fan art galore for such a concept. Would make a great echo fighter. If Ms. Pac Man ever got in it would be fun to see both of the oldest characters in Smash get their Minnie Mouse equivalents.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
There’s a difference between biological sex and gender identity, even if robots don’t have biological features there still are many that are engineered to have male or female attributes. Megaman has a male identity while Roll has a female identity.Yep. Although like I said, I see the female appeal since she's personified as female.
Because Mega Man is a robot. There is nothing biological about him, unless I'm horribly mistaken. And if something isn't alive, they can't have a real gender. They can certainly be personified as one of the two sexes, but in a literal sense, they are neither male nor female.
At least we can assume that Ms. PAC-MAN is alive.
I see your point. But I will say that the issue is more that the default variant is the one that gets the spotlight in the marketing. (though there are exceptions such as female Corrin in the classic mode mural, and male Inkling in the World of Light trailer)Like others have said, changing the alt isn't hard at all and takes zero effort, so this doesn't seem like an issue and is hardly "going out of the way".
I would agree that this is mostly true, with the few exceptions like the ones you pointed out.I see your point. But I will say that the issue is more that the default variant is the one that gets the spotlight in the marketing. (though there are exceptions such as female Corrin in the classic mode mural, and male Inkling in the World of Light trailer)
Yeeeah, no. I'm sensing a double standard here pal. I've been with ya on everything whether the conversation was about Kazooie or forced diversity, but I can't agree with ya on this.Yep. Although like I said, I see the female appeal since she's personified as female.
What is it that makes KOS-MOS any different? Is it the boobs? It's gotta be the boobs, right?Because Mega Man is a robot. There is nothing biological about him, unless I'm horribly mistaken. And if something isn't alive, they can't have a real gender. They can certainly be personified as one of the two sexes, but in a literal sense, they are neither male nor female.
You do have a point with this. I admit that this could be just me reading too much between lines and understanding something different from the posters' original intentions.This is the part I take issue with, but I feel like if I elaborate too much I'll be mostly repeating what I already said in the previous paragraphs. I just fail to see anything malicious behind this desire. And you're fueling this with political views way more directly than anyone else in the thread, and unnecessarily judging people for it.
Lotsa stuff. She's technically a weapon master.What is it that makes KOS-MOS any different? Is it the boobs? It's gotta be the boobs, right?
It still seems just as much like grasping at straws. We have no reason to believe Mr Game and Watch is anything but male, considering he is "Mr" Game and Watch and is referred to by male pronouns. There are characters that appear on Flat Zone that are clearly meant to be female, even if they're not called "Ms Game and Watch".
Again, I agree with pretty much every other character's placement, those two are the only ones I would change.
I'm not gonna repeat myself any more than I already have. Personally, I don't think it matters what you put on something and where--if it's a robot, it has no gender. I'll concede on Mr. Game and Watch though, I see your point now. Since most characters in Smash are assigned a gender, I can understand why some people see G&W as defaulting to male. Benefit of the doubt, really. But as far as Mega Man goes, I still hold on to the belief that he has no gender regardless of how much he is personified. It's all a matter of perception.Yeeeah, no. I'm sensing a double standard here pal. I've been with ya on everything whether the conversation was about Kazooie or forced diversity, but I can't agree with ya on this.
I perceived it as you trying to add more weight to your argument, but I misunderstood. Sorry about that!Now what I don't understand is people claiming that I'm grasping at straws, because in the grand scheme of things however you perceive Mega Man or Mr. Game and Watch doesn't affect the point I was trying to make in my original post: That Banjo & Kazooie and Corrin can't and shouldn't be considered "primarily male." Mega Man and Mr Game & Watch have nothing to do with that.
No need to apologize, I probably should have been more clear in the first place.I perceived it as you trying to add more weight to your argument, but I misunderstood. Sorry about that!
Frankly, I think it's pretty sexist of you to undermine and dehumanize the only female in the DLC atm. You can keep objectifying her all you want man, but your perception is a little skewed.
- As for Banjo & Kazooie, you primarily control Banjo, who uses Kazooie as a weapon for most of the attacks. There are some moves where Kazooie takes control, namely the running animation pulled out of Banjo-Tooie, but those are few & far between (I'd give a specific number if my little brother didn't borrow my Switch). And unlike their home games, there isn't much story or dialogue to give either of them much personality, which especially hurts Kazooie's case (a shame, as I always loved her dialogue in the Banjo-Kazooie games). Banjo is the main leader of the duo, hence primarily male. If Midna ended up playable instead of an Assist Trophy while riding Wolf Link, they'd be primarily female because Midna would be calling most of the shots
Well Kazooie isn’t human, so....Frankly, I think it's pretty sexist of you to undermine and dehumanize the only female in the DLC atm. You can keep objectifying her all you want man, but your perception is a little skewed.
Doesn't matter. Kazooie has human qualities like speaking English and having a personality.Well Kazooie isn’t human, so....
I was kind of thinking of a general Nintendo Direct next week.Nintendo has announced a Pokémon Direct for January 9th, 2020! https://t.co/rIdhnD6DOR pic.twitter.com/EhFRDOk3Gr
— Nintendo Wire (@NinWire) January 7, 2020
Nevermind. Back to sleep until February.
It's plausible, as some have pointed out that a Nintendo Direct tends to follow a Pokemon one. I'll still remain skeptical.I was kind of thinking of a general Nintendo Direct next week.
Guess I'll just sleep out of this one. Of we won't get anything next week, then most likely it'll be February.Nintendo has announced a Pokémon Direct for January 9th, 2020! https://t.co/rIdhnD6DOR pic.twitter.com/EhFRDOk3Gr
— Nintendo Wire (@NinWire) January 7, 2020
Nevermind. Back to sleep until February.