Maybe chainsawing isn't the right word here, or maybe it is. It's like you chainsawed Kantrip by defending him in light of SlickWylde asking you then immediately retracted your read and turned it around on him. Double standard maybe? The best thing you can do is explain where you're looking now given that you were wrong regardless.
I was asked for a read from Slick, analyzed the Dastrn interaction (giving Kantrip a null/town lean if I remember correctly) and then Gheb posted his wall on Kantrip. I went to look at Gheb's wall, played devil's advocate because Gheb was addressing literally everything from a scum!Kantrip perspective, and then I said that after fully analyzing the situation, I said that Kantrip was a weak scum lean. I never had a super strong read on Kantrip and he was weak scum the entire time after the wall on Gheb's post.
Why would you claim this?
I agree. This will be crazy suspicious if you aren't jailed or dead by D3.
His defense of Kantrip reaks of scum trying to get then credit on his flip.
1. For the love of all that is good and holy, I wasn't trying to defend Kantrip.
2. If I were trying to get credit for a flip, why would I vote for him?
3. You are saying that I would have benefited from a town!Kantrip flip, and you want me dead because of it. If Kantrip were scum, however, you would be saying that I was trying to defend my scummate and you would want me dead because of it. You can turn anything into a reason if you look at it with a scum mentality.
Why did this change again?
What do you mean by "change again?" It's the same thing I said earlier (
#479).
Vote: @The Man From Delamar until you come in here and actually give your opinions on the game at hand. I find it a bit sketchy that you are conveniently here for the flip after providing nothing all phase even though you were back from V/LA for over a day.