You're being a moron.
Circus, if J brought back someone like BRB back he wouldn't have claimed. That's the whole point. You can say that "J's just doing it for the town points," but that's to ignore the fact that if J was scum then it would have been much more efficient for J to bring back the indy and have town have to worry about that while mafia still stays strong (more or less).
You could agree that the indy would complicate matters for the mafia if they were limited to poison, but eh, you could also argue that Le would have been a good choice for mafia to bring back without the risk. You might also argue that scum might be limited to bringing back a town player, but that's making an extra assumption, and the more assumptions you make, the more unlikely it is according to Occum's Razor.
You're right. I
could say that reviving the indy would have complicated matters for the mafia and I
do. Because it
would have! Reviving a useless townie and then claiming the revival is a much safer choice for scum to make because it psuedo-clears one mafioso (which is all they need to win) as long as no one thinks about it too hard. Bringing back the indy is just asking for one more way things could go wrong.
Now then, I agree with your observation that Kantrip was not the best choice to bring back, but I'm not too sure if that I can call it scummy. It is however worrisome that J didn't consult that rest of the town first, so I will give you that.
God, ****ing thank you. I'm glad someone is listening to me about this. I mean, really, what is the first thing you would think to do, with town motivation, if you were suddenly handed the ability to revive a dead player? Even if you were dumb enough to think that Kantrip was the best choice (July, Chuckie and Rajam ALL would have been better, and it hardly even takes a moment of thought to understand why), wouldn't you still think to yourself "hey, let me run this by the town first and see what they think? Multiple heads are better than one after all."
J's revival of Kantrip was completely self-centered. He was hoping we would take the lazy way out and take "revived townie" as enough of a reason to turn a blind eye to him toDay. Unfortunately, for some reason, it seems to have worked on some people. Even with me pointing out the holes in it.
Pretty much another reason for me to read through Day 4 again. I need to fact check what's being said now and see who I like more. Anyways Circus, if you're town, then I think that you and bardull are just not interpeting things the same way. You're state that RR's actions, his claiming, his jump on July, his vote of himself, were all scummy. Bardull's seeing the same thing as you but just interpreting them differently. Consider that.
I understand that Bardul is interpreting things differently (or is at least claiming to). But he's wrong, and it's causing him to be wrong about my slot at a time when such a thing is extremely hazardous to our chances of pulling a comeback in this game, and I don't know how else to prove to him or anyone else why his interpretation is wrong.
@Circus: Do you think that Ran and J are scum together?
Difficult to say. At first, I was expecting J to simply refuse to name his "mason" buddy so as not to incriminate a fellow mafiosi. However, doing that would also pretty much be equivalent to accepting my accusations against him, so Ran actually revealing himself is one way that a J/Ran scumteam could be trying to double down and get me lynched for the win. Having Ran claim to have masoned J is kind of a clever third option, as it leaves room for the option that Ran could be a town masoner who just happened to pick scum to mason. However, it is common practice for such roles to indeed die if they target scum, so if I'm leaning one way on Ran here, it is scum, yes. Just not concrete enough on that to lynch him toMorrow without a good deal of reexamination beforehand.
Why did J and Ran "peak" your interest? Go into that specifically.
J always piques my interest, if I'm honest. If he and I both live long enough and I have a way of investigating him, I'll get around to taking it eventually, and that's essentially what happened here. A few things stuck out to me as awkward, such as his kind of confusingly stubborn position against Soup (I was pretty stubborn on him as well, but that's actually my normal play. J tends to dip his fingers into multiple pies and him-and-haw on all of it for a while). It also just seemed like he was holding a lot of people at arm's length all game to make sure they would be able to be pushed later if he wanted to. I'm specifically thinking of the way he basically held the exact same position I did on BRB when he hammered Chuckie, but threw FUD on me for suggesting BRB was probably scum. I ultimately decided to investigate BRB on N2, but then when N3 came immediately afterward and hardly any real new information had been gathered, I just decided to look at J next.
Ran peaked my interest by playing D2 basically the opposite of the one way I've ever seen him play before. He came in saying "welp, looks like D1 all over again lol RVS VOTES." Typically, he's all business. I mean, it's a
thing in Dgames now that Ran asks questions and actually puts an arguably annoying amount of attention into interrogating and examining people. And he just didn't do much of that the first two Days. He lounged in the background the whole time.
Agree that it's weird how Circus wanted BarDull's claim despite claiming to have been roleblocked on him. Evidence that Circus is scum looking for the final mislynch.
No. I asked for Bardull's claim because I felt it could help some actual, substantive setup speculation. When I targetted Jdeitz, I wasn't sure what happened to cause my action to fail. The odds of me just happening to be the one targeted by a roleblock seemed low, but I didn't know what else would explain the failure. In addition, Red Ryu's kill on PJB failed for reasons we still don't know, even though his Doc protect on OS (at least one of them) apparently succeeded. I felt that if Bardull didn't volunteer a reason for why my target failed, then that would be clear evidence suggesting a roleblocker. Since we still have no mafia flips to go off of, we need to get creative about how we go about narrowing down what kind of scumteam we're dealing with.
Sorry for the lateness of this post. I realized I was going on a bunch of pointless tangents in multiple places and ended up chopping out gobs of text just now.