Well, time to take apart posts. Im gonna do this to Liggy's too, but its on a seperate page, and thus too hard to use the multiquote button, so Ill do his separate.
Please go through the Kingdom Hearts Mafia thread and find ten posts you've made warning people for being innactive and some where you voting on them because of it. It really shouldn't be that hard since that game was filled with innactives the whole game through.
Ill get to work on it after I finish this. I doubt I can find ten, but Ill try and get it. It wasnt just inactives though, its just a warning before a vote. Tens a pretty massive number though.
I understand your point about gloating. That could be him defending someone he knew was screwed yet innocent and announcing he was right as a strategy. But I cant read his mind so I'm not going to go through a whole bunch of maybe situations. It's a guessing game, and I dont want to play.
Glad you understand, thats what I was saying completely. However, I run the maybes in my head, and post the most likely ones, so I think that that one is the most likely.
Dont care about the anger thing.
FAIL. Like Liggy said, look at what Eor did.
"took my vibes"... It's like you're accusing him of stealing. This is something which has irked me for a whole too.
God, you all are reading too far into that. It was just a joke! Its all in caps for christ sake. If the ENTIRE sentence is in caps, it means Im kidding! Plus, I even said in the next sentence I wasnt serious about it cause I said, "Ok seriously." I was pretty obviously kidding.
You combine your accusation of voting without reason with "stealing" to cast more doubt on him. Meh, I dont know if it was intentional or just flavorful writing, something I do too, but I thought I should mention it because that's what first came to my head.
Now again, I was just kidding, but its not entirely untrue to say I did it for colorful effect.
I agree, but this goes along with what I said above about how people will "predict" things they already know to be true to make themselves look good in front of the town.
Im sorry, but that makes absolutely no sense to me, the "predict" strategy. If you knew that, you'd have to be one of the people who targeted the person, and thus be scummy. Like I said, lucky informed guess. If I was mafia, I wouldnt have said anything about it.
The innactive you were going after was KevinM. I didn't twist your words.
Nope, I never really went after him. I said I didnt like his inactiveness, but never really did anything about it. This is all I ever said of it after Spam thought I meant I was suspiscious of Kevin:
I didnt say I got mafia Vibes from Kevin. I said you stole my vibes idea. I dont like that he is inactive, but it hasnt quite been enough yet to warrant a vote. But since Im on the topic now anyways, Kevin, get your *** active. Now.
And the last post you made about Spam Master you said you were still suspicious of him but unvoted because no one was following you with your accusations. "I've got my eye on you." Now you practically say you dont suspect him, but that your accusations were "long past". Contradiction!
Two reasons for this:
A) He hasnt done anything I will see as suspiscious. When people attack me, unless its repeated and without reason or other people see it as suspiscious, I wont suspect them because I think myself biased. So no, I dont really suspect him any more cause all hes done is attack me.
B) Ive been kinda busy defending myself to suspect him
C) Like I said before, Im trying the whole withholding info thing. Like I said, Im keeping my eye on him, but even if I had anything on him Id be withholding it to stop him from stopping himself from making the same mistake.
But I do know I've been posting a lot of situational evidence on you with a lot of maybes so I'm cutting you some slack. I'm mostly interested in the innactive thing and your sudden change of heart with Spam Master.
I thought you didn't like the "maybes"
But I think I explained myself sufficiently. The thing about warning Kada is in a different post, so just find it yourself.
Darn it. Should have proof read to clarify some things in the above post. Lousy no editing rule.
You dont have to vote on someone for it to be malicious. It's not like there's an invisible line you cross once you vote for someone.
True in some situations, but sometimes, like now, you have to vote for it to malicious. Im just warning him to be active WHEN HE SAID HE WOULD ANYWAY!!!! Its called having a reason not to go back on your word. Its a luxury I like to have, so I try and give it to other people when possible.
Also, going after an innactive... I cant decide if that's suspicious or not. In a way, yes, but in another way, no. If I'm bored enough I would do it too.
A) Yes, I was really uber bored.
B) I WASNT REALLY GOING AFTER HIM!!!!
Now... on to Liggy's!