I did show this though. But you are trying to WIFOM my reasoning away.
Deal, as long as you can explain to me how Scummy Behaviour =/= scum without WIFOM.
Why is this concept so hard to grasp? If scum has motivation to perform an action, but town also has motivation to perform an action, when that action is performed, it is a null tell in and of itself.
Yet TB, why didn't you call anyone else out on saying that for Nabe? Cuz he wasn't the only one saying that. Also you can do that by re-reading and realize that you read posts differently. If you have accepted this, why are you still trying to point out it's a contradiction?
He was the only one who said "Town on Nabe because he is a solid contributor without being in the forefront". Nobody else provided such a silly reason as "not being in the forefront" as a reason for a town read on Nabe.
I'm not still trying to point out the contradiction. I brought it up in defense because you tried to use it against me.
Please actually read what I'm saying before you respond. You're wasting my time.
Bullcrap, she had been adding and I want to see the proof behind where I did a similar thing with Nichy's posts.
@Nichy: Did you know what TB is talking about?
In a sec.
You flip in like less than 10 posts.
Yeah - I read it again and realized it wasn't so bad lol. That's all there is to it.
Do you even realize what you are saying in the first line?
Yes. There is a difference between anti-town and scummy.
It's not an exaggeration because it's there in your post. How does his role have anything to do with his timing?
I was nowhere near to swearing that his claim was true. If he truly had that restriction, he might claim now rather than after being accused of jumping on wagons and using it to justify his behaviour after the fact.
Because complaining about catching up could be done by both scum/town. Also "what?" at the second line? Yet your reasons were weak and reaching.
That's not what I was referring to at all. I was asking why Ranmaru's pointless questions should be treated as a null tell -_-
Now who's the one exaggerating/turning it back on their attacker?
![Roll Eyes :rolleyes: :rolleyes:](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
TB, most of the time I said that, I explained why it is off-colour/odd. It's off-colour because it's such a weird thing to say if you are from the town PoV. Why does town have to "wish" for better reads?
"
I don't like this one line from your 1067. The bolded bit even more so. It's like you are alluding that you know DeGrey isn't scum so he wouldn't do that. It may just be me but I dislike the wording of it."
"
In this post, you say some odd things in the second line. Odd meaning you do about everything besides swear upon a bible that we should listen to DeGrey's claim and believe it's more real. "No reason to not believe him." "If he's telling the truth, his claim timing is fine" "Also due to the nature of his restriction.""
"
Okay you say you wish you had stronger reads at the time which if very off colour. Though to be fair, you forgot to mention you had a strong Reyth town read as of that post."
Three places where you mention something is strange and don't back it up. Saying something is off-colour because it is weird from a town PoV is circular and is garbage. Try again?
Okay you say meta is a weak reasoning, yet you are using it for your Ryker read. Plus you are simply trying to WIFOM the point away. Grah this is aggravating. >_<"
Where did I say meta is a weak reasoning?
Yes, I am using meta here. If someone else were to act this way, I would probably be much more likely to call him scum. Is that a problem?
Again with the over-defensive/deflective nature. Alot of this post is "You aren't reading correctly" or you trying to WIFOM the points brought acrossed away. Second line, I have been showing why when I deem necessary. Show me examples of you scum-hunting because I can honestly not recall where.
Duh we are in D1 but this is possibly one of the longest D1s ever so you have to have something.
Apart from my push on Nich early, I've been asking questions to July and Ran. I've also questioned Reyth's reasoning several times, and finally got a response from DG, which I'm about to follow up on.
Sure, I'm deflecting a little of the pressure back onto you, but it's not like I've neglected to defend myself from your points. I did so, and then questioned the hypocrisy in saying my points are insubstantial.