thatoneguy1
Smash Journeyman
i havent read all 400+ pages so idk if this has been discussed but does anyone else think that fox is no longer top tier in p:m?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
he's definitely still top tier, just not the #1 spot anymore.i havent read all 400+ pages so idk if this has been discussed but does anyone else think that fox is no longer top tier in p:m?
Isn't that how tournaments usually go?I have an argument with the PM online ladder people.
they are the only people I have ever seen to not have stage bans stay for an entire set.
what I mean is that if you ban FD and lose, you could pick FD on your cp assuming they don't ban it also. what are your thoughts on this matter?>
Kind of off-topic from tier lists, but this issue came up on an EXPosure when I played against BLUX and he wanted to CP to FD on game 3 when he had banned it after winning game 1. Oro and Bobby ruled that banned stages cannot be picked by either player, regardless of who banned it. I'm inclined to agree, since it would stress the importance of game 1 in that, if the set goes to game 3, the winner of game 1 has the ability to counter-pick the opponent's character on two stages that were inaccessible during the opponent's counterpick.I have an argument with the PM online ladder people.
they are the only people I have ever seen to not have stage bans stay for an entire set.
what I mean is that if you ban FD and lose, you could pick FD on your cp assuming they don't ban it also. what are your thoughts on this matter?>
What? How would banning FD ensure he gets to CP it?Marth could do something like ban FD to ensure he gets to counterpick it later in the set. Pretty cheesey. DMG level cheese.
That's why banned stages should be banned from either player picking it, not just the opponent.
So that, if he wins game 1, he can possibly CP to FD without being hindered by DSR I assume.What? How would banning FD ensure he gets to CP it?
I must be getting something confused here.
But that doesn't stop the other player from banning it still.So that, if he wins game 1, he can possibly CP to FD without being hindered by DSR I assume.
Can we please add Zelda to this list?No, his Dthrow is showing
AND IT'S BROKEN!
Edit: Ganon deserves a lower grabbing box. Same with Falcon. I wholly support them getting viable options against the very short/low characters. If you don't buff their grabs, then you'd have to get real funky with their tilts to handle them. Just make their grabs not totally suck: who cares if someone like Marth can't grab a ducking Jiggs/Kirby/G^W/etc? Maybe he doesn't need it but holy **** Ganon and Falcon do.
I want to see this SO badly just for lulzGive Bowser a bowser-sized rest, and Jiggs a flamethrower that she can use while WoP-ing.
As a Zelda main, I appreciate the stupidly huge AGT I get off items meant to gimp me. It's almost a second up-bI-AGT a peanut while recovering.
Diddys be thinking they can harass with peanuts.
Wrong subforum.I would like the game to be as balanced as possible deep down inside I want Megman or Little Mac to be S-tier.
Even for those guys, Marth (and a few others that deal with this) can just dash grab instead. Falcon and especially Ganondorf could definitely use some grab tweaks.Ganon deserves a lower grabbing box. Same with Falcon. I wholly support them getting viable options against the very short/low characters. If you don't buff their grabs, then you'd have to get real funky with their tilts to handle them. Just make their grabs not totally suck: who cares if someone like Marth can't grab a ducking Jiggs/Kirby/G^W/etc? Maybe he doesn't need it but holy **** Ganon and Falcon do.
Or maybe he knows more than we do... Megman (clever pun to avoid lawsuits) and Little Mac (apparently not copyrighted) confirmed for 3.5.Wrong subforum.
Same here, most people I play against want something cool and colourful anyway might as well let them pick or they'll be playing on Battlefield or FinalDestination and occasionally some Fountain of Dreamsdo people really care this much about bans? i usually tell my opponent to take me wherever lol
turn down for what?My opponent will never be allowed to go to the stage they want. Only 3 bans? I disagree, I'm banning 12 stages. All gone. You can't have them, don't ask me if we can go somewhere.
Always turn them down. Always strike as many stages as you can. Don't laugh if you end up on PS2 anyways
Wow, you sure are a cool, tough guy! Takin' advantage of me not knowing a thing off the top of my head. I bet you get all the respect and girls!Have you played the video game?
But i mean... it was kinda obvious. How did you think chaingrabs worked, did you think they were hitting the ground every time?Wow, you sure are a cool, tough guy! Takin' advantage of me not knowing a thing off the top of my head. I bet you get all the respect and girls!
Blame the patriarchy and/or FoxWow, you sure are a cool, tough guy! Takin' advantage of me not knowing a thing off the top of my head. I bet you get all the respect and girls!
That's triggering me as I am a male Fox-kin.Blame the patriarchy and/or Fox
What do you get out of pointing out to someone that the answer to their question was obvious? Does it make you feel like a big man?But i mean... it was kinda obvious.
lol Bleck, you're something else.What do you get out of pointing out to someone that the answer to their question was obvious? Does it make you feel like a big man?
Not sure if you're referencing the Profesor Pro combo video...turn down for what?
maybe just the original song in generalNot sure if you're referencing the Profesor Pro combo video...
this used to be legal pre-2007 for melee, although it was not commonly used. But yeah I've banned stages to "protect" them for my own CP on game 3.I have an argument with the PM online ladder people.
they are the only people I have ever seen to not have stage bans stay for an entire set.
what I mean is that if you ban FD and lose, you could pick FD on your cp assuming they don't ban it also. what are your thoughts on this matter?>
This is actually somewhat incorrect, since both players have the ability to ban the same stage. However, you should definitely clarify that beforehand just in case. As much as we try to standardize rulesets as a community, there are nuanced differences like this from time to time.Kind of off-topic from tier lists, but this issue came up on an EXPosure when I played against BLUX and he wanted to CP to FD on game 3 when he had banned it after winning game 1. Oro and Bobby ruled that banned stages cannot be picked by either player, regardless of who banned it. I'm inclined to agree, since it would stress the importance of game 1 in that, if the set goes to game 3, the winner of game 1 has the ability to counter-pick the opponent's character on two stages that were inaccessible during the opponent's counterpick.
i wasnt but that was amazingNot sure if you're referencing the Profesor Pro combo video...