Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
fix'dResults may vary, effectiveness of "The Finger" depends on victim's ability to hold down on the control stick.
I pretty much never used the finger unless my opponent was airborne, even back in 2.1. Everyone knew to CC it.Trade Utilt for Dtilt, and you describe 80% of Wario players before 3.0
#FreeToby's Yoshi is good, but there isn't really any footage of it 'cause he's pretty much 100% Charizard in tournament. I've seen some crazy good stuff Yoshi can do, but he's just pretty unrefined at this point. Wait a good 6 months until people start really figuring out some of these "low tier" characters and I'm sure you'll see they're no slouches. Yoshi, Squirtle, Sonic... Sonic is super duper good, but naysayers bury him on the boards, same with Squirtle. Both characters are phenomenal and truly annoying to fight against when their tools are not only understood but felt.In the case of Yoshi, I have NO FREAKING IDEA. I haven't even seen a good Yoshi. I've watched all the supposedly good Yoshis, and honestly, I am less than impressed
Do you know if there is a lucario thread? I can't seem to find a lot of character threads where one would talk about MU's, but I would be specifically interested in lucario if you knew of one.I disagree with what people have stated about a MU chart.
EVERY character thread should work on a MU list of their characters. I know the PMBR actually wants us to do such a thing and not talk about arbitrary views or opinions.
The problem is that a lot of people discuss their character's MUs, but they're in just the general discussion threads. As of now there is not a dedicated thread for Lucario MU discussion. I say you just make one if you are interested.Do you know if there is a lucario thread? I can't seem to find a lot of character threads where one would talk about MU's, but I would be specifically interested in lucario if you knew of one.
Then we shall see how the game progresses with time and how matchups alter with knowledge and new technology.1 the game isn't finished
2 the finer nuances to the characters themselves are poorly understood
general discussion threads are probably fine for now
If Squirtle had Fox's usmash it would be whined about instantly and removed in the next patch. You don't give a character like Squirtle a move like that.nah, it could be nice on everyone.
yes, even Squirtle or olimar.
you'd be wise to develop that stuff for yourself. it gives huge margin when the game is new. research is broken lolThen we shall see how the game progresses with time and how matchups alter with knowledge and new technology.
With the fireball increase he feels like a Falco KirbyIsn't Fox.
Didn't it get nerfed in some past version? How does it compare to Lucas'?Besides, I dont know how someone could say Squirts needs a better usmash. His is pretty damn capable lol.
I think it is interesting to see what ideas people bring to the table and summarize them in one opinion-based/result-based tier list. I think it is interesting to see the progression evolution of data tier lists as time goes on. Also, assuming that there is no bias and a large sample size, a community made tier list would show an accurate tier list. AND BEFORE YOU QUOTE ME ON THE NO BIAS THING, tier lists are going to be biased because tier lists are mostly based off of peoples opinions. But that bias (such as everyone thinking that Olimar sucks etc) shows the peoples thoughts during that time period and thus accurately reflects the communities thoughts on the tier list at that time.Ali Baba, you should really stop pushing that. It won't be long before the ignorant start pushing it as fact, and not long after that until it starts to affect character choice and meta development. The best answer to the question "Is there a tier list?" is not "Here's a subpar inaccurate one made mostly from people's kneejerk opinions!" but rather "No, there isn't, pick anyone." Because 90% of the time, people want to know so they have an answer to why they are losing or who they should pick, when the real answer to both should be for the solution to the problem to be up to them rather a half-baked tier list.
Imagine Squirtle's tiny leg becoming something able to match fox's up smash in rangeIf Squirtle had Fox's usmash it would be whined about instantly and removed in the next patch. You don't give a character like Squirtle a move like that.
Besides, I dont know how someone could say Squirts needs a better usmash. His is pretty damn capable lol.
Well no, you need one other important thing - to have played someone who is good with that character. Even for people who go to tournaments, some areas just don't have a lot (or even any) players for some members of the cast. Unless you've actually fought the matchup, you just have to theory fighter based on match videos you've seen of the character and that's not really accurate.I disagree with what people have stated about a MU chart.
All you need is moderate experience with a character and you can make at least an educated observance on how a character feels versus another.
If Vectorman still played this game...In the case of Yoshi, I have NO FREAKING IDEA. I haven't even seen a good Yoshi. I've watched all the supposedly good Yoshis, and honestly, I am less than impressed
Bolded part is why I want to do a MU chart. A definitive MU chart will easily translate into a tier list.I disagree with what people have stated about a MU chart.
All you need is moderate experience with a character and you can make at least an educated observance on how a character feels versus another.
There is bound to be more disagreement on a tier list than MU chart, a chart can actually be backed by evidence, a tier list without a MU chart is only backed by arbitrary opinion.
EVERY character thread should work on a MU list of their characters. I know the PMBR actually wants us to do such a thing and not talk about arbitrary views or opinions.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PD_1NpsRJt4If Vectorman still played this game...
That is an old video. Of Vectorman. Literally playing P:M for the first time.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PD_1NpsRJt4
So a good P:M Yoshi does exist Even so, I can't help but feel that this God of Yoshis is an anomaly. He is almost M2K-esque in his movement, but he still doesn't completely overwhelm the opponent. I try to imagine that Yoshi up against Armada's Pit or M2K's Mewtwo or even Rolex's Snake, and I don't see it going well for Yoshi.
It's only from December. P:M had been out for a while before that. Also, Yoshi remained largely unchanged in play style from Melee to P:M. He can jump out of shield, but almost everything else is just general buffs. "This attack comes out faster, that attack has a little more knock back, etc."That is an old video. Of Vectorman. Literally playing P:M for the first time.
this whole post honestly sounds like you know that you don't have an argument but you're trying to stand your ground anyway. Yoshi as a character in PM is only 4 months old, and you're citing a 4-month old friendly of a guy that has openly said he doesn't play PM as proof that Yoshi is a bad character. The fact that you're trying to summarize his changes from Melee to PM in one or two sentences shows that you really aren't qualified to make that call.It's only from December. P:M had been out for a while before that. Also, Yoshi remained largely unchanged in play style from Melee to P:M. He can jump out of shield, but almost everything else is just general buffs. "This attack comes out faster, that attack has a little more knock back, etc."
M2k believes Mewtwo is a spacie slayer. We already know he can't be pillared.Does anyone here think that spacies have bad matchups now? I mean, even with all the buffs that characters got, I still don't feel like Fox, Falco, and even Wolf are at a disadvantage. Of course, it's only been 4 months since the latest version...
The spacies have such stellar offense that I question whether or not it's possible for them to go less than even with anyone. Sure, you can ostensibly get an early gimp on them on occasion, but they deal damage so fast and kill so early that they'll easily make it back up if they so much as touch you. You also really can't keep them out regardless of how good your disjoints are because they're just so fast and mobile.I don't know about bad matchups, but I definitely think the Spacies have negative matchups now...
Fox/Falco had a number of 5-5's to 6-4's in Melee, and it seems like for the most part, most of the other characters have been significantly buffed, which makes those matchups even or negative.
I personally think that as the metagames develop, one or more of the spacies could have serious issues with quite a few characters.. The game is still fairly new, though, and Fox/Falco have by far the most work done on their metagame thus far.
I'd say several characters suffer heavily from not being Fox in this game.Isn't Fox.
Well, DEHF v/s M2K.I've seen pretty much no matches ever where a top space animal player just really gets bodied (unless it's by another space animal). At worst, it goes down to the last stock and they just get slightly outplayed. Armada came the closest to making it look like the space animals have counters, but even then I think that was probably just Armada being godlike + matchup unfamiliarity with Pit.
I'd say just about any match with M2K's Mewtwo vs a spacie player fits this description.I've seen pretty much no matches ever where a top space animal player just really gets bodied