LivewiresXe
Smash Hero
That's weird because Ethan is the only castaway I know that was Jewish that was on the original All-star season. Is there someone I'm missing?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
you took me wayyy too literally when I said jewish. I was using it as an insult, lolThat's weird because Ethan is the only castaway I know that was Jewish that was on the original All-star season. Is there someone I'm missing?
I love Rob. <3Oh, well I WAS up till 3:30 last night, lol. And actually for the record, supposedly Rob C's jewish so, could've meant him.![]()
Why is he perfect. He needs to come back<3And he sings too, haha.
Agreed. I wouldn't change the way jury works at all. It is indeed part of the game. I just think that most juries consist of whining babies. Much of the time, the votes are all about spiting someone rather than voting for someone who earned it. It seems that players can only really "unearn" it.Still though, the jury have ALWAYS been 100% free to decide how to determine who should get their vote and it's the finalists job as they go through the game to read how the jurors will react accordingly. That's why a lot of people will say that how good a player is, is based upon how well they're able to read how people will react and act accordingly, and why people stress the importance of the social aspect.
There is a difference between "satisfying the jury" and "scoring all the votes". I am well aware of the unanimous vote getters. I would just argue that they were fortunate enough to take incompetent opponents to the end. Players work hard to take despicable/useless players to the end to reduce the workload.Sure you could say it's impossible to satisfy all the members but well...Earl and JT would disagree with you there, I'm sure.
JT didn't have to really answer a single jury question. Stephen spent the entire session giving non-answers and explaining how the heck he even got there. Stephen did *nothing*. Stephen was neither strategic nor tactful. JT planted him there.I don't know, I'd argue that Stephen wasn't incompetent and that well, anybody would've lost 7-0 to JT in the Final 2.
This ironically ties in nicely to the discussion we are having right now. The jury has its own emotional constipation that finalists have to deal with.Anyways, I just finished season 1. But my goodness Kelly did not deserve the treatment she got from Sue at the last TC. I felt really sorry for her she easily could have won.