So I was reading some reviews of Eternals and I found a few that confused me.
“Eternals has everything that makes a great movie. Interesting story, relatable characters, extraordinary set pieces, stunning shots, and even adrenaline pumping action but it just doesn’t put these things together in a way that makes the movie good”
That’s an interesting way of writing this out. I’m not sure what they were trying to convey here. The only thing I can figure is that it’s front or backloaded on exposition oppositely. So a lot of talking for the first half and a lot of action for the last? I dunno. I’m intrigued.
Edit: sorry I know that we had this conversation and people obviously aren’t a huge fan of reviews, scores, and reviewers in general but I find them interesting. It’s actually a field I’m interested in getting into.