I don't trust Sakurai, to begin with, so if all the (supposedly) hinting and foreshadowing for playable Ridley is in vain, nothing will change in regards of my opinion about him. He is just a man working to pay his bills, he will do whatever he is told to do or thinks is better suited for Smash Bros (and any other game he worked in). In other words, he will put whatever character he thinks will appeal the most to people. If Ridley isn't in, it is because Sakurai, for whatever reason, thinks he is unappealing OR because he was told to not put Ridley in the game (I can't think of a few reasons for that). What I am trying to say is that I will not hate Sakurai or anything like that, if Ridley isn't in. I think it is a pointless and somewhat childish thing to do, when you consider the points I brought up. For example, I see a lot of people hating on Satoru Iwata, because it is been at least one millennium since the last F-Zero game was released, but most people don't seem to consider the possibility of Iwata not being the one to decide that (he is the president of Nintendo, but he doesn't get to decide everything in regards of the company). Plus, like Sakurai, he will do what is best for the company, their goal is to sell as many copies as possible of their games. Developing a new game for a niche series might not be the smartest idea, when you think about it. Perhaps putting a menacing and creepy-looking character like Ridley, in Smash Bros, isn't a great idea either. Lets hope this isn't case.