Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
The logs are the best part.While I def prefer Ridley over Sylux, Sylux character was by far the most interesting from the hunters lore. and actually I would love to see Sylux on another metroid game.
Regarding Metroid lore stuff i would love to see in the next metroid game:
-Sylux returning, posible as a constant hazard with gameplay implications, instead of a boss battle (I think that samus is far more powerful than Sylux on a straight 1v1 arena, but sylux isn't as stupid to face samus on a straight arena, Look how rundas ended)
-Anthony Higgs returning as a NPC comrade. mostly giving samus a little of human socialization before entering at full into the desolate wilderness of metroid.
-A Chozo character . In Prime I loved reading the logs, including Chozo ones. i'm not sure if this character should be a lone survivor, or be already dead, since I kinda like that Samus carries the burden of an exctint race. but having at least an aparition as a ghost. I really love Chozo designs.
In fact i'm not completly sure if i want space pirates or even Ridley, unless it's pretty well written into the story. you know, poor guys shouldn't be overused. and we don't want Ridley to turn into the series anime team rocket.
Ah, so Ridley is like the ocean; Large, imposing, and the source which all streams lead back to.
But seriously though, that's how it is here. As long as it relates to Ridley, some of us see it as on topic.
How does it relate to Ridley? If he isn't in the game, we think he could still be DLC. So we're discussing if that could be a possibility.
Welcome to the Ridley thread. It's a maze of conversation topics here, but in the end it all leads back to Ridley.
They're talking about the mysterious purple things on the edge of the stage.
It started with a Ridley DLC petetion, turned to Weavel saying he thought Ridley had no chance without DLC, people arguing about if Ridley wasn't playable on launch he wouldn't be playable at all, to questioning if Sakurai would add Smash DLC at all, which is where the debate is still at.
But seriously though, that's how it is here. As long as it relates to Ridley, some of us see it as on topic.
How does it relate to Ridley? If he isn't in the game, we think he could still be DLC. So we're discussing if that could be a possibility.
Welcome to the Ridley thread. It's a maze of conversation topics here, but in the end it all leads back to Ridley.
Definitely some guy talking crap, I don't even remember if the cylinders even are in Other M. One thing's for certain, Ridley never interacts with them.To further help keep things going, somebody brought this up on NeoGAF:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=122984299&postcount=5560
They're talking about the mysterious purple things on the edge of the stage.
....HUH??? Since when did Other M Ridley do anything like that in the Geothermal Plant? I'm pretty sure he doesn't, so I don't know at all where this is coming from. Perhaps some guy just talking crap and it got taken seriously?
Edit - Shut up Con0rrrr...
You made the perfect reference out of the whale picture...
Nicolas Cage
Who's going to be the next huge controversial character that will surpass the main discussion itself?
Clearly it will be Ridley when he is revealed to be a stage boss.
Oh, umm. I guess Nicolas Cage doesn't really fit then...
Again with the blaming Weavel! Everyone needs to stop accusing Weavel, seriously.
Assuming K. Rool doesn't make the cut, decent choice.
I wasn't trying to insult you, many of your previous posts were poorly written, I was stating a fact. I had hoped I could teach both of you a bit at the same time. When you write posts poorly on a forum, whether you were trying to or not, people may mistake you for a troll because many troll posts are written poorly. I can see you've put more effort into this post and it's much easier to both read and take seriously, and I appreciate that. I treated your arguments with respect regardless of how your posts were written, as to not insult you, because it sounded to me that you knew what you were talking about, but weren't putting much time into your posts.
They did start it though by saying the only way Ridley was getting in was through the petition to add him as DLC.
You, are so welcome.
And now I have to go back on Miiverse! Heh. I have been seeing alot of support for Ridley there recently, it is strange, but nice.
I genuinely don't believe that my previous posts were written poorly, I do believe however though that the majority are reading small bits and coming to a conclusion that I also brought up as being severely unlikely or impossible. Such as people saying sakurai said there would be no dlc while in the same post I said that he stated he currently has no plans for DLC. Many seem to take this as a complete dead stop, but MANY gaming companies have said the same thing and and later delivered.
This has so much relevance to Ridley it hurts
Yeah'd it
Yeah, isn't the BITF writer's most wanted character Ridley?
Maybe he will be revealed in time and BITF will have a comic bout it =D
I think it's absurd how you keep mis-interpreting that argument. I was using a basic proof by counter example to show that your previous logic had been wrong. I knew that what I was writing wasn't serious. That was the point. And I was able to back it up with the same logic you had used (a lot of fans would want it, it would sell) to show you that if you can use the same logic to argue that ridiculous thing then it can't be right, so you can't use it to argue the DLC thing.
That would be an epic final comic...
Remember how I said I would post that one image description of our thread?
I just died a little insideRemember how I said I would post that one image description of our thread?
Here it is. Sums up everything since the first pyrosphere pic.
![]()
Already mentioned this morning. The tubes are not in the game, and Ridley never tilts the platform. It literaly takes a couple of seconds to go to youtube and find any video of the boss fight, and amusingly the fight is really short too. Sometimes Id like to have an account there, just to point out how dumb they are...To further help keep things going, somebody brought this up on NeoGAF:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=122984299&postcount=5560
They're talking about the mysterious purple things on the edge of the stage.
....HUH??? Since when did Other M Ridley do anything like that in the Geothermal Plant? I'm pretty sure he doesn't, so I don't know at all where this is coming from. Perhaps some guy just talking crap and it got taken seriously?
Edit - Shut up Con0rrrr...
I figured as much. Heck, I've played the game. But just had to be sure I didn't miss some bizarre occurrence.
It started here about ridley and its going to end here. My previous logic was not wrong and it was exclusive to nintendo characters, it was your logic that said WELL LETS JUST HAVE ANYONE WE WANT FROM ANYTHING! which is an insult to me because I never insinuated that and neither did my "logic"
>Ridley acts sadistically and sociopathically most of the time
that leak is fake because they say no female robin, and they say robin will have multiple hair styles.
It fixed, now there is a little smash logo in the middle of the circle icon thing
I am not blind to what you are saying, I just believe what you are saying here doesn't apply to me what what I read from you lasts posts. I know what a counter argument is but to the extent you were using it in was ridiculous.
Please no. Why are we doing math ;-;
Apparently this:
I don't care about the last words :/ I care about getting my point across. It's not even about opinion, it's very basic fact. I'm not sure if you've ever debated; or had a standard argument before (not one about who was right or wrong, but one where each side states facts, and uses only evidence to argue), but it's clear you don't have much experience in that area. I'm not trying to sound elitist, I'm just trying to explain everything I'm saying in the simplest terms possible to give you the tools to argue back.