Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
"You like a Nintendo all-star who is the main villain of a major Nintendo franchise? This is grounds for me to insult you because you are obviously stupid and inept."
Fixed.
That's so Sakurai!
Oh, you think I'm new.
I've been mostly lurking with the occasional post since right after the Direct. I am not new, merely...clandestine.
I got glitched into the front of the screen fighting him as Samus when he did his tornado spin thing, It was just like a super close distorted line in the front of the screen and I could move around and attack while it was just like I was falling infinitely, haha
I know that. "So..." and lower part of my post are not connected in any way...kinda...I saw one of your posts here before.Oh, you think I'm new.
...this thread got over 500 more pages since that Direct. Sure no one here thinks that he has a potential of being a playable character.
.You're taking my question too literally. Of course I know that you guys think that but I'm trying to wrap my head around why.
I hate to say it but I think this Garfield guy has some legit info. If true, I don't know why he would think we would want a playable boss Ridley for a special mode but it has been something many of us assumed could be a logical conclusion to all the teasing. I want Ridley playable but not like that!
I made a huge post about ANYTHING I had to say and roger answered with mostly disagreement but since I said anything I had, arguing is unnecessary so...Japan Time was talking about some of the size comparisons for Ridley that we've made (in particular that one with Ridley and some of the cast including Charizard that was made by @Angelglory I think?)
Bla bla wings are too wide horizontally wide...Ridley towers over the cast... Bla Bla.
I know I shouldn't care, but you guys put hard work into those models and they shot them down.
Not buying that leak for a second. The poster never mentioned that Robin would be playable, and I seriously doubt that Sakurai would want to implement a stupid mechanic like playable bosses. I mean, what's the point of making Ridley playable in that mode when you could have used the time and effort to make him an actual character.
...That's even worse.
His deconfirmation was not clear. Compare it to Skull Kid, Chrom, Dark Samus, Samurai Goroh, etc. deconfirmations. Notice something? Oh, they are shown and their roles is revealed clearly. Ridley? His shadow was shown in Yellow Devil (not BOSSES section, i hate when someone says that it is "bosses" section) section and it was barely bigger than Bowser`s (it looks big only because his wings are big). And he wasn`t even called by his name. Since Pyrosphere reveal. Sakurai teases boss Ridley? That is BS. It is like if he would tease Mario.
I don't know I think an asymmetrical boss mode would be right up the Wii U's ally. I know many of us thought about a 5 player mode like that being the u exclusive. I really hope its fake though. Only time will tell.
Sure, Sakurai hasn't tweeted "RIDLEY NOT IN GAME" but...
This has been brought way too much time but if you insist...Sure, Sakurai hasn't tweeted "RIDLEY NOT IN GAME" but...
"Boss characters make appearances in other stages, not just this one"
*Cue obvious shadow of Ridley with the caption "Other boss appearances"*
I dunno, it just seems delusional at this point. But whatever!
I'm pretty sure he just got lucky, his responses in this thread was pretty much just him joking around with it: http://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/633202-super-smash-bros-for-wii-u/69647375
Well for one, Rosters for each game are the same and you can't play a 3DS game with the Wii U tablet, that right there is more than enough to kill this leak.
He wouldn`t say that Ridley is not in the game anyway. Because there would at least be his trophy. But i know what you wanted to say. Why make such exception when EVERY other character disconfirmed was called by their name, their actual role was revealed and they were actually shown? Sakurai himself said that he doesn`t likes to give peoples false hope.
Who 4th character will be if Dark Samus is an AT? There is no other Metroid characters that deserve to be playable character. Only DS, Samus and Ridley. I think that ZSS is completly unnecessary. But unfortunately, she was added in Brawl and still is here in Sm4sh.
You didn't read my post above, did you?How is that quote not clear
And do you really think Nintendo has to put out a statement every time a character a bunch of forum users want isn't in the game
They did that before for every single deconfirmed character. As soon as they confirmed their role.How is that quote not clear
And do you really think Nintendo has to put out a statement every time a character a bunch of forum users want isn't in the game
Nope. He already got something wrong. Something important. For example, 3DS and WiiU will have same roster. 3DS can`t use that WiiU thing, so, it would be impossible to control bosses. FAILURE.
I did. Your "literal" explanation doesn't make sense.
The easiest thing would just to read the thread, where we've already discussed this at great length several times over.
omg how can I explain this?
