Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Someone in the comment said Ridley was 60 feet tall. Larger than a goddamned building... and about as tall as a Gundam.
That's a few times bigger than DARK META RIDLEY, who is already more than doubling up on Ridley's normal size.
Ridley as large as a pinata confirmed.Someone in the comment said Ridley was 60 feet tall. Larger than a goddamned building... and about as tall as a Gundam.
No, he is
LYRICS. NOW. THIS HAS TO BE A THING.
...Did you just say that Ridley is fanservice to the female fanbase?!
Sakurai said that he specifically appeared in the Mushroom Kingdom U stage, which implies that he'll be appearing exclusively on that stage.. So I'm guessing he's a "stage hazard," or more appropriately a "stage character," if you will.
It's specifically said it appears on Mushroom Kingdom U, implying it's a feature exclusive to that stage. Seeing how Nabbit was nowhere to be seen in the E3 demo, it debunks the theory that states that Pyrosphere wasn't included because Ridley was incomplete (which is a dumb statement on its own)
Is it wrong for someone to finally come out and say what we have all been thinking? At least he had the courage to do what we could not.
I had to do it. I had more fun writing that than I think I should have.
Considering the size of this thread, I don't think most men can resist him either.
-___- Oh God, really? I don't even find anything attractive on that thing on steroids....I find it....meh...., and the Original Ridley may be anorexic, but at least he doesn't have to be overly muscular to show he is strong physically.....and he's very unique in so many ways, and has a beauty and elegance in his designs along with "bada**ery"...and has a great intelligence the he doesn't need to show speaking...just his actions.
MUSCLE, MUSCLE, MUSCLE, WHAT? MUSCLE, MUSCLE, MUSCLE, FLEX!
Sounds similar to something...something about heels...for some reasons...i don`t know why...do you know why?
Do U even lift?
when I said they wanted to club me, I said that because of all the hate I got, I don't have a link, but it is in my miiverse posts as I won't get rid of it
You can get under him and shot upwards while jumping, the lava is less damaging than Ridley so there
sassy Ridley, on the spot!
So I know the people fascinated (and attracted at times) to anthropomorphic mammals are called "furries."
You are learning the Art of Talking Real very fast.I was bored and it's been awhile since I posted here so, here's a surprise essay on the "too big" argument. Since it's meant to be a realtalk, you know what it means: EARTHBOUND AMBIANCE!!!
< REALTALK >
Well, no matter how I see it or no matter how I want ridley, I'm still wondering how it got THAT huge.
Like seriously, this argument getting talked form time to time or briefly, ok that would make sense because it's understandable that not all people check the other side and thus, need explanation. However, the fact that it's CONSTANTLY being talked is what is probably one of the most impressive debate condition EVER.
There's a part that is subjective though: the look he would have after getting downsized. Even considering the melee trophy, that doesn't mean that all people would like that as playable that would depends how you see him.
BUT, the fact that it would not be possible to resize him FOR THE ONLY reason that he's canonically a huge sized boss IS SO OBJECTIVELY FALSE.
That's not even arguable, no alternative, no negotiation. You don't even have to point out the bowser instance, you would just need to say: "Because Smash isn't canon, the elements may alter from their original game to suit the need of the game." That's true because you don't HAVE to get the EXACT content of ANY game to put THE SAME content into ANOTHER game. That's not even just for characters even stages and I'll go as far to say music since some are remixed.
Like, honestly, the fact that this thread still has to bring facts like this leaves me speechless. Even the brawl rep (which I made my point awhile ago: SSE + dynablade = only a boss because of how he looked like dynablade) doesn't destroy that because, well, what does it have to do with him NOW? He WAS a boss so, is there any reason that he HAVE to be a boss NOW because he WAS a boss? It's like saying that smash will never change but it actually needs to change to not feel repetitive.
huh... I legitimately wonder if this thread got that much pages for stuff like this. It's really depressing for me to even think that what I said above had to be used multiple time before to make people realise that it's not relevant. Because honestly, if I did think that ridley wouldn't make sense playable, I would've at least be subjective because that would literally be an opinion. Here, it's like stated as false fact every single time so you shouldn't even need to argue with this. How could I possibly make sense if what I'm stating is impossible to interpret with the correct facts?
Actually, look at how it's stated; it's exactly what happens: "Ridley is too big to be playable!", "Ridley was made to be a boss!", "You can't resize ridley because he was made to be big!", "Ridley is..." okay you get the idea but there's tons of instances that you may (and should not) have seen that has always this in common: it is stated as false fact.
So, just this is fascinating. Can anyone tell me why it got worse? Ah right... because he was in danger which means more discussion. And what these discussions still had because of that "argument"? It is stated as facts again and you know what it means: even more people are even more ENTITLED to think that he CAN'T be in smash. Not WON'T or SHOULDN'T but CAN'T; it just goes downhill like that. The direct got that even worse as if it wasn't enough (I had to wait a full MONTH to do a big essay on him at E3 because of how it was just impossible to tell it and then having to do it again after it was already said anyway).
There IS actually legit and subjective opinions against him that was probably discussed already and those should be considered and argued more carefully. But not that, it's not even worth it just stating the right fact is enough and that's not arguing, that's correcting.
All this text to say that I HIGHLY respect how this thread is handling this. To still not losing interests of support after all this is awesome. You're seriously though and your 1k pages was well deserved.
< / REALTALK >
Ouf, this one was long but I like this SO MUCH
His chances? Frankly, I don't know any more. The direct is now perfect 50/50 for me and the demo could go either way. I'll say by words: I think that Ridley has "GOOD" chance to be playable in Super Smash Bros 4. No percent because I hate arbirtrary numbers but you get that it's above 50. I believe that the purpose was hidden for a very good reason and at this point, I just think that hazard isn't THAT worthy for that. I didn't say "GREAT" because it's still worthy, in a way. I just don't agree with this way and also, I'm more doubtful. Before, I may have said "GREAT" or "BIG" but now, I just want to be safe and realistic.
I still kinda want him though. Not that much but you got to agree that either way, it would be delicious to watch this thread.
I think the most appropiate term would be "Scalies".
It's okay to resize him if he's a boss, but he still can't be playable even if he was smaller than Olimar because Ridley is the embodiment of exception
Now I want a picture of Rudley.
But even that is different because Ridley's shadow is different and automaticly shows he's too big whether he is or not.
You couldn't be more wrong.
I can't tell if you are being sarcastic or not. I do not understand why it would be alright if Boss ridley was rescaled and why it would be bad if fighter ridley was rescaled. Is it because you wouldnt see him as much?
It's because Sakurai would never scary little kids by making him playable, they would think it's ridiculous a scaled down Ridley, that's why Waluigi will never be playable, because he's way too ugly, making him a boss won't scare little kids because I say so and if you disagree, you're delusional, now, if you allow me, I'm going to request Goku, Shrek and Shadow at the comment section of Sakurai's Miiverse post because if he doesn't add them I'll tell everyone to not buy the game and Nintendo will be doomed and they'll have to make games for XBoner and PS4000 with Goku and Shrek as playable characters, Ridley won't be in the ggame becase he's 10x bigger than ur mum
Ridley Louis Armstrong - "Smash bros has been in the Armstrong line for generations!"
Scalies? I mean, mammals have fur, reptiles have scales. So...
Samus: *Lethal Strikes Ridley* My parents are deaaaaaaaad!
