Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
It's not false you ****.Why would he know about a game that was was totally overlooked, came out when the N64 was out (in JPN), and didn't really do anything for the industry. Don't bring me that ''first 3D game, first time Bowser was playable'' bull****, I'm tired of that discussion and it's false.
Why would he know about a game that was was totally overlooked, came out when the N64 was out (in JPN), and didn't really do anything for the industry. Don't bring me that ''first 3D game, first time Bowser was playable'' bull****, I'm tired of that discussion and it's false.
I said Ally.Super Mario Kart was the first game in which Bowser was playable. It was also the first 3D Mario game. Super Mario 64 was released before Super Mario RPG in Japan.
Technically, it is. They are now referring to certain 64 games as Retro.i understand people like geno, but occasional gamers rarely know of him and he is not RETRO retro he is 1990's retro unlike gam&watch and the ice climbers who were in the firsts video games
No, you just don't seem to get it.Super Mario Kart was the first game in which Bowser was playable. It was also the first 3D Mario game. Super Mario 64 was released before Super Mario RPG in Japan.
EDIT: I'm not ''tired of getting owned''. Evertime I disprove your ****ing false assumptions with with ****ing hard facts, you don't seem to reply!!
Easy, easy, we get it, you are obviously NOT upset, because you are NOT getting owned by anybody, it's OBVIOUS by the way you keep your cool.... ¬¬Super Mario Kart was the first game in which Bowser was playable. It was also the first 3D Mario game. Super Mario 64 was released only three months after Super Mario RPG in Japan, and probably took much longer to develop.
EDIT: I'm not ''tired of getting owned''. Evertime I disprove your ****ing false assumptions with with ****ing hard facts, you don't seem to reply!!
Mathieu21, buddy, face facts. Super Mario RPG was a history making game. Okay, Im done with this $*** because the ownage in this thread is starting to make me break out.
Your first point was that SMRPG was the first game in which Bowser was playable. I remember it as clearly as crystal. The ''ally'' thing is just something you made up after I owned you with Mario Kart.I said Ally.
And, Mario RPG was created way before Mario 64 was. Therefore:
HISTORICAL
LEGENDARY
wrong on so many levels.It was also the first 3D Mario game.
Yet, none of that has to do if Geno will be in Brawl or not.I know I own a lot of people with my facts, but you have to accept it.
Your first point was that SMRPG was the first game in which Bowser was playable. I remember it as clearly as crystal. The ''ally'' thing is just something you made up after I owned you with Mario Kart.
I was mistaken about Super Mario 64. It was released three months after SMRPG in Japan. Still, THIS IS NOT ENOUGH TIME FOR SMRPG TO INFLUENCE SM64.
Yes, SM64 would ave taken longer but Mario RPG was still the first Mario RPG due to the release and the creation date.Your first point was that SMRPG was the first game in which Bowser was playable. I remember it as clearly as crystal. The ''ally'' thing is just something you made up after I owned you with Mario Kart.
Did I say playable? Heh, I'm sorry than. I get stuff mixed up with stuff or I just didn't know about Old School Mario Kart. But:
1. That was a spin off game, it meant nothing to the series.
2. He was still an ally. An ally that in a game that was important to the series.
I was mistaken about Super Mario 64. It was released three months after SMRPG in Japan. Still, THIS IS NOT ENOUGH TIME FOR SMRPG TO INFLUENCE SM64.
Are you ********? Mario Kart is 3D! It uses the mode 7 mapping to create a 3D effect. You can evolve in three dimensions.wrong on so many levels.
then leave, no one will miss youAre you ********? Mario Kart is 3D! It uses the mode 7 mapping to create a 3D effect. You can evolve in three dimensions.
SMRPG is pseudo-3D. Characters are in 3D, but environments aren't. You can't evolve in three dimensions.
I'm really starting to get annoyed by people who are blinded by fanboyism.
Are you ********? Mario Kart is 3D! It uses the mode 7 mapping to create a 3D effect. You can evolve in three dimensions.
If you means Mario Kart, then you fail.Are you ********? Mario Kart is 3D! It uses the mode 7 mapping to create a 3D effect. You can evolve in three dimensions.
SMRPG is pseudo-3D. Characters are in 3D, but environments aren't. You can't evolve in three dimensions.
I'm really starting to get annoyed by people who are blinded by fanboyism.
in that case, Yoshi's Safari.The way you interacted with the game was 3d, not the models.
This makes all the difference.The way you interacted with the game was 3d, not the models.
I don't know this game, but it cartainly isn't Super Mario RPG. Therefore, SMRPG isn't the first 3D Nintendo game.in that case, Yoshi's Safari.
Sure, why not?in that case, Yoshi's Safari.
"worthless illusions"? can you be a little bit more descriptive than that? because that's what video games are.SMRPG is just creating a worthless illusion with pseudo-3D graphics and 2D gameplay.
that does NOT look like 3D, in any case Yoshi's Safari looks more like a 3D. And SMRPG is still more 3D that that, see it this way, SMRPG was the first game with 3D renders of characters and 3D environments (meaning you could move in 3 dimensions)http://www.mariobros.it/img/smk.gif
in the end, it still looks like sprites to me. nothing too revolutionary. it's not like racing games haven't done this before or anything.
it is not retro retro, it is 1990's retro. it can't be compared with the Atari 2600 or the Nintendo Entairterment System who are REAL retro, original retro, retro retro, Ever-Lasting retro etc....what!? the super nintendo is not retro?
i disagree.
Nintendo referred to OoT as retro...and it came out in ~1999it is not retro retro, it is 1990's retro. it can't be compared with the Atari 2600 or the Nintendo Entairterment System who are REAL retro, original retro, retro retro, Ever-Lasting retro etc....
but tha's just my opinion
I don't get owned.hahahahahahaha, all this Mathieu21 owning is happening cause of me on page 1064.
youre STILL being owned by people, for 24 hours. i find that funny.
Your posting assumptions...I don't get owned.
I post facts, and they can't disprove them. All they do is misinterpreting them with twisted fanboy logic.
May I say... denial?I don't get owned.
I post facts, and they can't disprove them. All they do is misinterpreting them with twisted fanboy logic.
AMENWho cares what he was the first of,
he was in a great, enjoyable game and had a unique set of moves unlike anyone else and deserves a spot in brawl
the more the merrier