M@v
Subarashii!
lay off guys -_-
Its called "life".
Its called "life".
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Ya, I wasn't in the mood, I can do it tonight though, but you can't do it, so whats the difference? Not my fault lol.i asked and vex said he didnt feel like it tonight.....
That just totally motivated me... lolOk guys seriously get something done tonight, get everyone on at a set time and discuss everything and put a theme up.
But you just "weren't in the mood" last night, which you coulda done something about. x.o Xzax has a legit excuse at least, lol.I want people to be on tonight, but if there not I can't do anything about it.
My excuse was I had a pounding headache, whats his excuse during the week? That he has school? BS, his sleeping schedule is so missed up his always up late at night lol.But you just "weren't in the mood" last night, which you coulda done something about. x.o Xzax has a legit excuse at least, lol.
Anyways, I'll be around tonight after around 8-8:30. PM or VM me, and I'll hop on AIM.
Oh well, either way, I'll be on tonight and ready to do it whenever.Headache =/= "didn't feel like it"/"wasn't in the mood". The way you said it, it sounded like you honestly just didn't give a **** lol (altho I suspect you really don't x.o).
This is the dumbest thing you could have said. This just goes to show how biased you are to xzax being over chibo. If you are on the panel, and they would like to rediscuss an issue, that means that MAYBE something new might be brought up that could change your opinion/vote. To not listen to or participate in the debate as a panelist member is completely unacceptable imho. Like i said, new arguments could be brought up and despite how "set" your decision is, it's always possible that it might actually change.I don't need to be in any conversation. Whatever I decided last time is what I'm sticking with.
Again, what if something new is brought up in your case? What if someone is like "Wait a second, xzax should actually be above smurf. We were looking at this all wrong." You're vote wouldn't change then? Grow up and rediscuss any issue that is brought up by one or more of the panel members.me and inui are keeping our top 10 as it is.
Pennsylvania Player Finder and Power Rankings
Power Rankings:
Mission Statement: To create a unified state-wide community in Pennsylvania which will encourage players to actively seek competition and strive for improvement.
Our primary criteria is tournament results, as in overall placings. Obviously, more recent results hold more weight. Then, we consider how each player on the panel achieved those placings (who they beat, who they lost to). Finally, with such a large state, it is very likely that some people have never even been at the same tournament, much less played each other, so the panelists will have to simply make their best judgment on who should be ranked the highest. The activity requirement is 3 tournaments in any given ranking period. Also eligibility as a member of the PA Smash community will be determined on a case-by-case basis.
Eh, the problem is, that's always been there, but in previous seasons, we've changed our mind based on performance and never updated that post.i have no idea why smurf quit.
And i agree w/ what you're saying about inui. The fact that it's in his head will make him biased slightly.
And on the issue of .Com, mav, and myself...
This is quoted from the OP. The rules are still there for everyone to read. The minimum amount of tournies is still 3, as i have highlited in red. I have just refuted .com's argument. Ignorance of the rules is no excuse. Now they need to rediscuss if my losses are bad enough for me to lose my ranking![]()
Chibo, How about a GE rep? I know people wanted me, but it doesn't even have to be me if someone doesn't want me. Theres already one KC on the panel.I believe someone else, mainly a KC member for representation, should replace Inui on the panel. 2 out of staters is a bit much, and I agree with what Nasty said there. Saying you don't need to be in a conversation is ridiculous. Would anyone be opposed to Nasty being on the panel?
grow up hmmmm.....maybe i f i didnt know me vs chibo by heart and didn't discuss it 100 times maybe i wouldI would be opposed to me being on the panel for this past season's discussion. Maybe for this new season though.
And there is a reason why inui wasn't on the NJ panel... for the same reason why he should no longer be on the PA panel as an OoS rep. He is just too biased and bases his decisions off of skill and not performance for the SEASON IN QUESTION.
you know how house of reps workChibo, How about a GE rep? I know people wanted me, but it doesn't even have to be me if someone doesn't want me. Theres already one KC on the panel.
we got:
1KC
2OoS
1UFB
Nobody texted me so I'm assuming nothing was discussed last night.so did you guys get anything done yesterday, or y'all just argued and again about the xzax and chibo situation.