~Twitch~
Smash Master
lol, i would've if i could've kevin.
-
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
The North Carolina Melee Power Rankings! (Updated 2/11/10!)
- Thread starter Dr Peepee
- Start date
- Status
Dark Hart
Rejected by Azua
girlfriend johns, broski
You're gay too.
Both of you.
Both of you.
~Twitch~
Smash Master
lol, how is dark hart gay?
stingers
Smash Obsessed
sorry, i was too busy having a life.
LOLStongers, that's a good one.
Cuz Dark Hart is making stuff up. That's why.
Cuz Dark Hart is making stuff up. That's why.
DJRome
Smash Hero
i wish i could . . . 
~Twitch~
Smash Master
*sigh* yeah...
lord karn
Smash Master
If I had known you guys were there I very well might have come. :embarrass
We posted about it several times....
Dark Hart
Rejected by Azua
Duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude
Slasher, Cam's joking.
Edit: I hate it when you guys troll somewhat well.
Slasher, Cam's joking.
Edit: I hate it when you guys troll somewhat well.
DJRome
Smash Hero
i doubt it. . .
DJRome
Smash Hero
<3 cam, come to my house i have beer and gc
DJRome
Smash Hero
eff dat harvest moon
-ACE-
Gotem City Vigilante
full moon is where it's at
DJRome
Smash Hero
lol smb2 is too hard i played that during exams on the emu
AlcyoNite
Smash Champion
looovved this game
xTONEx
Smash Apprentice
god**** right lol
back on topic or this thread will receive a Zangief bear suplex.
Didn't I let you have your locator thread back?
Didn't I let you have your locator thread back?
DJRome
Smash Hero
hey, what do you people think about playing out spots? like for 5th playing 5th for 5th and 6th? i may institute this to get more match data in
DJRome
Smash Hero
5th place is two people. let them play out for 5th and 6th place instead of just tying for 5th
mike g
mike g
onlymaskde
Smash Lord
dj is talking about playing for spots in tournaments
DJRome
Smash Hero
in my opinion, attendance is weighted very unfavorably in the current prs. those who rarely attend but do well at one may not fair as well at others. but attending gives more data and yet more risk. case: foxy attends one tourney this period. he beats me and karn. he is higher than both. i beat karn at one, but i go to others and that puts more data in my corner. there is not reason to assume that foxy would not lose in other tourneys but he doesn't go so that doesn't count against them.
im not really sure what the prs are supposed to mean so i can't say, but it seems that there is a flaw in the system.
and the oos stuff is just plain incalculable but whatever. despite fairness i say that it's most fair to implement some sort of attendance system but hey, what do i know. . .
in all fairness, the current prs work pretty well and i can't see anyway to tweak the cons so it's fine, but if a new system that works well comes along, it should be considered i think.
im not really sure what the prs are supposed to mean so i can't say, but it seems that there is a flaw in the system.
and the oos stuff is just plain incalculable but whatever. despite fairness i say that it's most fair to implement some sort of attendance system but hey, what do i know. . .
in all fairness, the current prs work pretty well and i can't see anyway to tweak the cons so it's fine, but if a new system that works well comes along, it should be considered i think.
Set counts are the records players have vs one another(for example, if someone loses 0-2 vs everyone they play, then their set counts vs those people is 0-2).
We don't penalize for attendance as long as someone makes it to one tournament in a ranking period since we update so often.
Set counts are weighted by the position each person is given in the current PR panel(which is partially derived from the last PR set but not really....it's hard to explain).
I'm really not sure what purpose this serves.....not frustrated, just confused....
Edit: DJ, that's not true about attendance. who's to say foxy wouldn't beat you guys and those other people anyway? you just assume that showing up to the one tourney you lost to foxy at that you would do better than you did showing up to more?
it's not about math, so it must be wrong.
I wonder sometimes.
I plan on using that model Daft comes up with as a tool to help us fix any possible great discontinuities between the two lists that are produced(by panel and model).
To be honest, I think a well thought out description of the process made to rank players into the PR list is something that should be implemented into the OP.
That's just a personal thought.
I also like the idea of putting a point system only so I can see something like
1 - Dr.PP (plays with) 102 points
2 - Lozr (plays with) 89 points
.
.
.
7 - Polywondol (plays with) 32 points
etc.
Personal note, again.
That's just a personal thought.
I also like the idea of putting a point system only so I can see something like
1 - Dr.PP (plays with) 102 points
2 - Lozr (plays with) 89 points
.
.
.
7 - Polywondol (plays with) 32 points
etc.
Personal note, again.
I don't. The reason there is a panel is because we don't need the state participating/criticizing in the process. The panel is chosen because of their ability to follow the process and provide useful insight on any irregularity/unforseen circumstance that might arise.
Throwing a description up there allows the state to criticize the panel(more than they already do) and makes the panel's job harder than it needs to be.
Throwing a description up there allows the state to criticize the panel(more than they already do) and makes the panel's job harder than it needs to be.
Bl@ckChris
Smash Hero
for the sake of advancement, yes.
for the sake of "what were you thinking"...not really.
for the sake of "what were you thinking"...not really.
You see ZIO, if everyone thought the process should be criticized, then it would be a bunch of fighting.
Remember back in MLG days before Brawl came out? There was plenty of criticism then.
Remember back in MLG days before Brawl came out? There was plenty of criticism then.
No one is willing to make the effort. I am, though. I still don't think there's a clear way in seeing just how different Player 8 is from Player 7, and how far away they are from Player 3 by looking at the list. We just assume that they must be good because they're on this list.
You think people aren't good for making it onto this list?
- Status