ClarkJables
Smash Lord
hahah youve got 666 posts. also what is your opinion on the toad development...
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I suppose. I just hate that argument. There are some decent points against all characters, including Lucario, but that one doesn't fly as far as I'm concerned.ooooo, smashrevenant got his *** OWNED!!! naw just kidding, he's new, give him a good time for the first few weeks/dayz circus...
thats why he said all i can do is guess. he just happens to have strong convictions for his opinionsStyles aren't improtant, remember pikachu? he's cel shaded, and look at your beloved squirtle:
![]()
not cel shaded...
besides as long as its from the series, the character doesnt have to look realistic along with the other character of the series, the looks are the LEAST of the characters problem, and Im sure many will agree on that...
Again ur just speculating on saying:
All of the character of SF would have most likely to apepar in command
same goes for FE and pkmn...
NOTHING of that sorts has been confirmed, got any solid proof? no? then its not confirmed, just like lucario not being in brawl, thats not confirmed...
again a characters look is the least of the problem to be in the game, just because they have used TP designs, that doesnt mean they cant add the most used Y.link look since for the Y.link (AKA WW Link) in brawl...
How odd.... and it was about Zelda too. Anywho, I doubt Toad will become playable at this point. And I really hope Toadsworth will NOT be playable either. I'm still hoping for Petey Piranha to be honest, as strange as it sounds. Some people claim he will still be in, and I think they need to quit trying at this point. I mean, this aready happened when the Tom Nook crowd kept denying that Tom was in the background of a level.hahah youve got 666 posts. also what is your opinion on the toad development...
Styles aren't improtant, remember pikachu? he's cel shaded, and look at your beloved squirtle:
![]()
not cel shaded...
besides as long as its from the series, the character doesnt have to look realistic along with the other character of the series, the looks are the LEAST of the characters problem, and Im sure many will agree on that...
Again ur just speculating on saying:
All of the character of SF would have most likely to apepar in command
same goes for FE and pkmn...
NOTHING of that sorts has been confirmed, got any solid proof? no? then its not confirmed, just like lucario not being in brawl, thats not confirmed...
again a characters look is the least of the problem to be in the game, just because they have used TP designs, that doesnt mean they cant add the most used Y.link look since for the Y.link (AKA WW Link) in brawl...
I can't predict the future. But you shouldn't be denying the facts I have given you. Its really hard to believe you can't see that everything for Zelda so far have been similar to Twilight Princess. As well As DK being from Jungle Beat. Pokemon from Red/Blue, etc.
*Looks at Pikachu and Viewtiful Joe*Dude that's a drawing of viewtiful joe, not an actual in game screenshot *sigh*
Pikachu is cel shaded, see her tail in one of her profile screenshots, and part of her body as well, notice the shading, thats what makes him cel shaded...
And YOU shouldnt be deniying the possibility of ANY character being in brawl, as long as they are popular, unique and have a role in their series, then they have a shot, Cel-shaded Link has the popyularity (is on the polls) a very diferent fighting style from the average link, hell not even the spin atatck is the same! and he is the official version of the Y.links in the zelda series, he can easily be a replacement of the Melee Y.link,,,
dude, i think that pikachu is prolly the one ash has...and i'm pretty sure its a guy...i said its prolly the one ash has cause hell, that ones the most popular one...and i agree with you on the y. link stuff.Dude that's a drawing of viewtiful joe, not an actual in game screenshot *sigh*
Pikachu is cel shaded, see her tail in one of her profile screenshots, and part of her body as well, notice the shading, thats what makes him cel shaded...
And YOU shouldnt be deniying the possibility of ANY character being in brawl, as long as they are popular, unique and have a role in their series, then they have a shot, Cel-shaded Link has the popyularity (is on the polls) a very diferent fighting style from the average link, hell not even the spin atatck is the same! and he is the official version of the Y.links in the zelda series, he can easily be a replacement of the Melee Y.link,,,
Gladly! I figured someone would bring him up eventually.Care to explain what the theme for Mario is then?
I hate to comment on this since I'm kind of on your side with the Lucario issue, but I gotta. That picture of Viewtiful Joe may be a drawing, but it might as well be in-game graphics. That's exactly how he looks in the game.Dude its a drawing, a drawing =/= in game graphics...
Kid? Im supposedly 2 years younger than you, which I doubt u have that age since you dont use very logical statements, u may get one here and there, but most of them? no...
It's a drawing, I aint making stuff up, seriously ur flaming me cause your saying pikachu aint cel shading, in other words your saying I cant tell the diference between cel shade and normal graphics, u cant tell a drawing and an in game model apart!
exaclty! Zelda series has changed over the years, why not use the newest and more used Y.link version for Y.Link in brawl??
Dude its a drawing, a drawing =/= in game graphics...
Kid? Im supposedly 2 years younger than you, which I doubt u have that age since you dont use very logical statements, u may get one here and there, but most of them? no...
It's a drawing, I aint making stuff up, seriously ur flaming me cause your saying pikachu aint cel shading, in other words your saying I cant tell the diference between cel shade and normal graphics, u cant tell a drawing and an in game model apart!
Pikachu isn't cell shaded... and Pikachu is a boy...Dude that's a drawing of viewtiful joe, not an actual in game screenshot *sigh*
Pikachu is cel shaded, see her tail in one of her profile screenshots, and part of her body as well, notice the shading, thats what makes him cel shaded...
And YOU shouldnt be deniying the possibility of ANY character being in brawl, as long as they are popular, unique and have a role in their series, then they have a shot, Cel-shaded Link has the popyularity (is on the polls) a very diferent fighting style from the average link, hell not even the spin atatck is the same! and he is the official version of the Y.links in the zelda series, he can easily be a replacement of the Melee Y.link,,,
. . .C.F os the star of one of nintendo's better known racing games. Thats why he got in.. . .And if you don't play F-Zero, you wouldn't know who Captain Falcon is, right? But, oh, look, he's in Smash. . . .
Yes, I realize this. My point is that a character doesn't need to be know by everyon to get into Smash. To this day, I would not know who Captain Falcon is if he hadn't been in Smash Bros. The "I hadn't heard of Lucario before joining these boards" argument doesn't fly. If you don't like Lucario, fine, but give a better reason for not wanting him in.. . .C.F os the star of one of nintendo's better known racing games. Thats why he got in.. . .
how the **** are these drawings...? o and if your talkin about vj, then i could go and take my time to post one of his pics as well...that aren't drawings. And if i'm understandin you correctly stryks, your sayin this is a first cel-shaded type(being "half cel-shaded"...you said the same thing for squirtle(i think)I know viewtiful joe graphics, those and WW graphics are similair, pikachu is cel shaded but not to the extreme that is WW or VJ, hes part cel shaded for its light shading, anyway thats a drawing...
Pikachu isn't cell shaded... and Pikachu is a boy...
![]()
![]()
Thats the thing, WW wolrd =/= TP, dont you know the time line? WW takes place in the future of OoT, were ganondorf was imprisoned, and TP take splace in the past of OoT were Y.link returned to, and thus ganondorf was the one in TP, was held by the sages, stabbed with the sword of sages for his crimes yada yada yada and u know the rest...
Their DIFERENT worlds, but theyre THE SAME SERIES, just because opne looks diferent from the other, we cant add it cause one is realistic, and one if cartoony...
I know viewtiful joe graphics, those and WW graphics are similair, pikachu is cel shaded but not to the extreme that is WW or VJ, hes part cel shaded for its light shading, anyway thats a drawing...
Squirtle has more graphic-ness than pikachu, hes nto cel-shaded or part cel-shaded like pikachu...
anyway what im triying to say is:
TP realism doesnt affect the chances of WW link, and being the most used link in existence, being in brawl...
Yea, but you are comparing a star of a series to a random pokemon in the games.Yes, I realize this. My point is that a character doesn't need to be know by everyon to get into Smash. To this day, I would not know who Captain Falcon is if he hadn't been in Smash Bros. The "I hadn't heard of Lucario before joining these boards" argument doesn't fly. If you don't like Lucario, fine, but give a better reason for not wanting him in.
I realize this, but the point I'm trying to make still stands—Not everyone needs to know of the existence of a character for that character to appear in Brawl.Yea, but you are comparing a star of a series to a random pokemon in the games.
It's a valid reason not to support the character, for sure. I'm not expecting anyone to support a character they know nothing about. It is not, however, a valid reason to say that a character cannot be in the game.And not knowing what something was before coming to this preticular (sp) forum is actually a valid reason to not support it or to feel that its really not as popular outside this forum.![]()
I agree 100%.Being popular =/= get into brawl free card and not being popular =/= no chance at brawl. Simple as that. . . . Sakurai does what ever he wants.
JUST because of Twilight princess?Sorry if Im mistaken, but most of the Zelda are cartoony:Zelda should look detailed and grungy.
Well actually the split time line theory is correct (Or more specifically confirmed) you see it go's like this...Umm... Link, Zelda, and Ganondorf are different people in every game. Its just the "age old" story about reincarnation of the three powers of Courage, Wisdom, and Power.
Besides if the Zelda SERIES for Brawl is being represented by the Princess Twilight game, then why would we need to mix the WW style into the TP group? It wouldn't make sense to me.
Pikachu's style and Link's style are supposed to look different because their styles and series are different.
WW Style Link was only used for 4 1/2 games, definitely not much more used than the other versions.WW style Link is used much more and has such uniqueness, popularity and the main roles in more videogames that can easilly be used to replace the Melee Y.link...
Umm I think most people were arguing about you saying that pikachu was Cel Shaded... >_>;You must have not played WW then, WW ganondorf is the same one of OoT, only fat... and cell shaded...
and who says Twilight princess (not princess twilight) is the only one representing the game? Again ur making stuff up with only info given so far, in other words ur speculating, nothing of that sort is confirmed, and the facts remain, WW Link cartooniness doesnt affect his chances being in brawl...
WW Style Link was only used for 4 1/2 games, definitely not much more used than the other versions.
There is Classic Link, brownish hair, used in every game up to OoT
OoT Link, a child and adult version, used in Most of the games since OoT
WW Link, Wind Waker, the 1 1/2 four swords games, Minish Cap, and Phantom Hourglass (as it's a sequel)
Even if that logic wasn't true, how does "WW style Link is used much more and has such uniqueness" make any sense? If he's used more as you say, how is he unique?