Technology improved, but 3D also made the gameplay very different - such that there are still many people that prefer 2D platformers and therefore two different markets came about once 2D platformers made their big comeback in the mid-2000s.
https://kotaku.com/5577352/the-revenge-of-2d
You might not mind a smaller roster, but I know a lot of people would be calling for Sakurai's head (literally in some cases, unfortunately) if their main character got cut.
I agree that 2D and 3D Mario are certainly different experiences, but it's still Mario. If Smash ends and simply ports Ultimate to everything Skyrim-style, then that could potentially be as controversial as Smash 6 serving as a sort of reboot with a smaller/drastically different roster, as there is no substitute/ successor.
And, this isn't really a "debate" point, so much as just conversation, but it isn't necessarily that I want a smaller roster. Rather, I see quite a few of the veterans as "fat" that could be trimmed to make way for even more newcomers. I know that literally every character has its fans, which is why Sakurai is bringing everyone back this go-around, but I think it would be interesting to see a sequel that reverses the development of Ultimate; rather than focus primarily on veterans and then focus on a few newcomers later, Smash 6 could bring in an integral base of veterans, along with a sizable number of newcomers, and then focus on other veterans as DLC, if need be.
Sakurai is an artist at the end of the day, not a businessman, and he has a lot of control over what gets in the game. Putting Goku in might be profitable, and 4Kids Entertainment says they would be on board, but it's doubtful he would ever do such a thing. Though I think he would be a lot less likely to say "nope, an Assist Trophy is an Assist Trophy and that's final" than to say Smash is only for video game characters. That being said, Assist Trophies might have a disadvantage on the ballot if they're perceived as non-viable.
I agree. And, sure, you could apply what I said to "Goku in Smash" to point out the argument's flaws, but, as you said, comparing a first-party character who is already in the game (just as a summon instead of a playable character) to a non-video game character on whom Sakurai has made his stance known might be a bit wonky, haha. A playable Assist Trophy wouldn't jeopardize the point of Smash Bros. as much as a playable anime character.
I'm also skeptical of another ballot taking place, and I agree that online support will be very important for who gets in as DLC. As I said I think Ashley has a good shot if there is DLC and the "no Assist Trophies" rule isn't a thing (both of which are quite likely in my view). Nobody is a shoo-in though, and we'll have to work hard to grow the fanbase!
Amen, haha. Until Sakurai announces "Good news! DLC is coming! BUT ASSIST TROPHY CHARACTERS WILL NEVER HAPPEN! GET REAL, KID!", we have nothing to lose. And even if he does announce that, we have the hypothetical Smash sequel in a decade or so to work towards.
Okay, I see what you mean now. And you got me on Shadow and Geno. Right, so we narrow it down to popular recurring first-party characters that aren't already in the game from relevant franchises with viable futures. In that case, Ashley is upper echelon (which is part of the reason why I thought she would be a good fit for Smash in the first place). But "Nintendo All-Stars" are not the only characters that get into Smash. We also get one-time Fire Emblem characters, new Pokemon, and third-party fighters among others.
I was actually going to talk about that in my novella responding to you, haha. I think that Fire Emblem characters are potential "Nintendo All-Stars", as well. Since the series has that Final Fantasy-esque "one-off" structure to it, it's hard to apply the same expectations as you would for, say, Mario. But we know that recurring characters like Marth, Ike, Tiki, and Anna are up there, considering they keep showing up. And Pokemon ... is Pokemon, haha. The series might run parallel of just about every other Nintendo property, but I'd be hard-pressed to not deem a character that Game Freak/The Pokemon Company/Nintendo wants to push a "Nintendo All-Star".
That leaves us with retro characters and third-parties, the former of which are just Sakurai wild cards, and the latter I try not to think about, haha.
But yeah, that's why I'm optimistic about Ashley's future in Smash. At this rate, just about any of Ashley's competition is probably going to be in the game, so next go-around (or maybe even for DLC), she could be Smash 6's next Inkling, so long as WarioWare stays afloat (which I'm optimistic about), or assuming Ashley gets a spin-off (which I'm slightly less optimistic about, but I guess it could happen).
No, he usually saves the novelty character for the end. Mr. Game & Watch is hidden in Melee until you unlock all of the other characters, and Duck Hunt wasn't announced until after Super Smash Bros. for 3DS had been released. But Bubbles is a good one!
This is true. But, considering the "fan-favorite" nature of literally every newcomer thus far, it would be disappointing to finish off with "And last, but not least *drum roll* ... BUBBLES FROM CLU CLU LAND!" Under any other circumstances, I would get excited for Bubbles (or a retro rep of any sort), but I sort of just want to hurry up and usher in all the fan-favorites that people have been waiting for since Melee/Brawl so that we can start a new era of Smash speculation, one where Ashley's likelihood isn't outshined by people still worrying about Isaac a decade plus after the death of his series.