I skipped out on Smash 4 for the most part, barely touch the 3DS version and skipped the Wii U generation. With that said, judging off what I see of the characters and know of them...
- I have no personal draw to her as I never played her games or followed her in the slightest. I honestly don't know how she was the most requested on the ballot in any reasonable way as she isn't a big name as far as I know. Also hearing she is 4's Metaknight just makes me want to point her to the exit as well.
- He is some eye candy, but that's about as much as I got to say about the guy. Not attached to him and being 3rd party makes him a quicker cut for me seeing as we already have many sword users to not need him.
- Fire Emblem flooded the roster with Smash 4. With
off limits and
sporting a new kit... I'd send the boy packing. I'm not sure how I feel on that though since i like him and fan demand brought him back. But it doesn't help
exists as another Marth clone making him a bit more redundant.
- Earthbound always felt kind of random to me and I'd say losing one of these two similar characters from a small series is better than elsewhere. I prefer Lucas, but I really don't think anyone who was the 1st rep for a series should be cut. That's why I cringe at the
cuts, because he is the
for that series and deserves his spot over anyone else. So I apply that to
as well and he'd stay.
or
- I don't agree with people that
should be cut since he was a highly successful pokemon in the current generations and I don't think Generation 1 needs to hog the limelight in smash. He's a pretty interesting character to me in smash, and I loved the Froakie line in pokemon. I think it also is cool that in the end that the frog managed to become extremely popular and big when he was against the usual generic fox/canine pokemon that blows up the internet when teased. Jigglypuff was successful at the start, but she quickly became more of a relic than her peers. Meanwhile Charizard was added later into the Smash series when it could of been a smart to have someone newer. However he is a lot more popular in general. So it comes down to seniority in smash v popularity of the pokemon. I'd go with
in the end since her main reason for remaining is that she was in the original Smash which is weaker than being a very iconic and popular starter.
Ignoring the Rules-
My first cut though skipping the rules would be
even if he counted as one removal. I have no interest in them in the slightest. I'd also cut
before
in a heartbeat though he'd be next if Fire Emblem had to lose another. I also would cut
and
since I'd rather clones be like Falco or Lucas where they feel more separated in character than their counterpart. But even with cutting those 4 forbidden in the rules, I could see a few more of the characters I listed needing cut or being better off cut in the long run like one of the Gen 1 pokemon.