Patooty
Smash Ace
Do you mean Canadian players going OOC or other's coming in?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Like tiep mentioned earlier, only tournament matches would be counted. Going by So-and-so beat this guy in a MM isn't exactly a great way to calculate things because some people do better against better players even though they lost to this one person. The way this is being thought out I say go for it. Going passed 10 is a nice idea but we shouldn't get carried away and go up to 40 or something. I say just up to 15 or possibly 20, at least this way it wont be horribly inaccurate and we could still move some people around without too much trouble.This Program will also read the type of people you are playing against? aswell, it can not read money matches, or put anything else in consideration? This program will be taking in only limited information then, there for it will be a little off?
Humans have the ability to have better understanding, and can make a much more accurate choice, especially with the amount we have doing the PR right now.
I SUPPORT THE PROGRAM/IDEA TIEP AKA PATOOTY!So I downloaded tio the other day to check how Neal saved tournaments. My original plan was to feed his save file(s) into my program and have everything magically happen automatically, but it doesn't seem like I can do that unless I ask Neal some questions about tio, which I don't really feel like doing right now.
So... this means that after every tourney, I'll have some data entry work to do and I'm trying to think up an interface that I wouldn't mind working with.
Before I throw a bunch of hours into this, I wanna know if it's even the right way to go. So far it's just been a (imo) nifty idea that I've thrown around from time to time and that Rushan supports.
Pikachu? Charmander could **** Pikachu up any day.Honestly, I can't see why we don't just ask Pikachu what the PR should be.
Well, my idea was sorta like a ladder system where everybody is gaining/losing points on every tournament match. You would win/lose more depending on how good your opponent is relative to yourself. So everybody would already be ranked. To automate it, I think people would have to be using the same name in all the tournament tio files. I dunno how Tiep did the program though. Might be completely different.Like tiep mentioned earlier, only tournament matches would be counted. Going by So-and-so beat this guy in a MM isn't exactly a great way to calculate things because some people do better against better players even though they lost to this one person. The way this is being thought out I say go for it. Going passed 10 is a nice idea but we shouldn't get carried away and go up to 40 or something. I say just up to 15 or possibly 20, at least this way it wont be horribly inaccurate and we could still move some people around without too much trouble.
Since the data for who you played is in the tio file, it should be possible unless data is inputted manually. It cannot read money matches. There is nothing else to take into consideration except maybe the bad luck thing, but that applies more to players really low on the list I think. Chances of someone like Tiep getting Eric and then Adam right away and being eliminated is low if we use a skill-based seeding system. Someone like me being hit by Eric and then Adam is quite a bit higher though.This Program will also read the type of people you are playing against? aswell, it can not read money matches, or put anything else in consideration? This program will be taking in only limited information then, there for it will be a little off?
Humans have the ability to have better understanding, and can make a much more accurate choice, especially with the amount we have doing the PR right now.
Dang it, Rushan, this is the last straw.Pikachu? Charmander could **** Pikachu up any day.
My lucario vs your pikachu MMDang it, Rushan, this is the last straw.
Pikachu vs PT moneymatch. Say, 10 superpotions, best of 5?
John And Tiep Please Post Your Most Up To Date Pr List So We Can Get This ****ing Thing Updated.most Biased Crap Ever... Hmmm. I Don't Really Agree With That Statement. There May Be Some Bias. Look At My Newest List And Tell Me It's Biased Though. I Think It's Pretty Accurate. Of Course It's Not Good For Just Me And Eric To Be Panelists, That's Kinda Dumb. If Eric And I Were Suddenly The Only Panelists Doing This, My List Would Remain The Same As The Most Recent One I Posted. (perhaps Spots 8-10 Could Change Easily Though). It's Not A Big Deal Though, I Know U Didnt' Mean Anything Personal By It John =)
I'm Starting To Feel More And More Sorry For John About This. We As Panelists Should Actually Talk About This Though. Even Though I Think There's A Fairly Neutral Concensus About The Updates, We Need To Get Some In Depth Debate Going. Via Email. As A Suggestion To You John, Maybe Just Update What Most Of Us Agree On And Then We Can Go From There.
What I'm Pretty Sure At Least 3/4 Panelists Agree On...
1. Eric
2. John
3. Manuel
4. Ryan
5. Tiep
6. Adam
7. ---
8. ---
9. ---
10. ---
Some Major Points I Think We Need To Discuss:
- Taking Off Or Keeping On Robbie Coyle
- Tony's Spot Vs Roby's Spot. So Far It Looks Like It's Leaning Towards Tony Over Roby. need Some Input (even As Simple As Posting What You Think Is The Most Accurate List To Date) from Tiep/john On This.
- Matt, A Solid 9th Or Not? Most People Seem To Think So.
-keith & Evan Probably The Most Suitable Candidates For 10th Spot. "sion" Also Impressed Me Yesterday As Well. Tiep, John, And Eric Were All There To See Him As Well.
- If We Take Into Consideration What I Have Said Above, My List Would Look Like This Right Now.
1. Eric
2. John
3. Manuel
4. Ryan
5. Tiep
6. Adam
7. Tony
8. Roby
9. Robbie
10. Matt
And With Robbie Off The List...
1. Eric
2. John
3. Manuel
4. Ryan
5. Tiep
6. Adam
7. Tony
8. Roby
9. Matt
10. Evan/keith/ Still Unsure.
I Hope This Helps Us To Get This Thing Updated Soon And Takes A Burden Off John As Well. It Really Is Alot Easier To Make The List With Taking Robbie Off, But This Is Something We Have To Agree On. He's Stated That He Doesn't Care. Also, There's No Legitimate Length Of Time That's Been Determined For "in-active" Smashers. This Is Another Factor We Must Consider.
The john here is that Noobking is too good =pInteresting.... this definetly makes it alot more complicated seeing as how drastically your list has changed tiep o.O. Also, I ***** tony the last 2 tournament sets I played him in, in a row, but I guess I'll just have to **** him some more
EDIT: JUST WAITING ON JOHN NOW... >.>
But Charizard sucks. If it were Charmander I'd be all over this.Dang it, Rushan, this is the last straw.
Pikachu vs PT moneymatch. Say, 10 superpotions, best of 5?
pkmn stadium 64? i assume u're saying pkmn stadium and stadiums from 64, moneymatch in melee.PKMN STADIUM(1) 64 Moneymatch.
If it matters, Tiep, me and Robbie Coyle came 2nd a while ago...
and I beat people in fake tournament matches? lol. But either way, I think most people know how bad or how good I am, at least compared to themselves.
edit:// didn't Roby's performance last tournament give you something to think about in terms of his placement? He came 4th, didn't he? And he beat Tony, and beat Adam, no?
omg seriously? I'm going to Kim Mitchell tomorrow night in Vernon at the Funtastic Festival. How was it? Good I hopeI was just at a Kim Mitchell concert.
Ergo, I'm #1 on PR of awesome, whether you understand me or not.
... I can't hear.
1 - ****Brawl PR
1 - Tony
2 - Eric
3 - David/Trozz/Liveryman/John/maybe Adam/maybe Gerald all somewhere in the top 10(ish)
No matter how perfect those CPU's are, they can't be the robot (M2K).What if meele CPU's one day turn into DNA composed Computers and infect the WWW? and the Department of National defence? and Smashboards?
And the only way to stop them is by beating them, but they are 1/2 frame perfect and have multiple mindgames in every mindgame.
Oh and then all our best players fall, and B.C is the last place on earth with smashers left to fight them off?
I don't know what you guys will be doing but I'll be training for this day.
1 - ****
2 - ryab/liverymen/clouderz/ rohin (rohin from the states right?)
3 - hitsugaya/blunted_object10/dynamism/trozz
out of those above 6-7 people, 1st is ****, then its ranked the way as it is shown.. i think.
"I will Moneymatch ANYONE on that list. because me tied with all those people on 3rd is LOL! [except tony lol]" - Johnomg seriously? I'm going to Kim Mitchell tomorrow night in Vernon at the Funtastic Festival. How was it? Good I hope
Brawl PR
1 - Tony
2 - Eric
3 - David/Trozz/Liveryman/John/maybe Adam/maybe Gerald all somewhere in the top 10(ish)
That's all I could ever come up with at this point as far as people I've seen. Maybe we'll start getting an idea around Evans tourney in January. Until then, Dieslow is ****...
If you are Gerald then I got his name wrong. I remember you being the TLink MK user that my bro faced, the guy I'm looking for uses Diddy I think lol"I will Moneymatch ANYONE on that list. because me tied with all those people on 3rd is LOL! [except tony lol]" - John
You have yet to get ***** by me. GET *****If you are Gerald then I got his name wrong. I remember you being the TLink MK user that my bro faced, the guy I'm looking for uses Diddy I think lol
Maybe it's you, if you use Diddy then yeah, you're around those 3s
Jiggs is broken in Brawl :D
Edit: Nvm, I just saw the - John part. lol ok it's all yours. I didn't see any of you other than a couple doubles matches while screwing around. So I don't really know exactly, this was just an estimate.