Aesir
Smash Master
DK is definatly better then link >.>
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I dont think so. I know a few tournaments where they ban link and luigi for low tier cause they pwn the low tier and everyone uses them...DK is definatly better then link >.>
Gimpy is pretty biased towards bowser, so he puts him 6th from bottom which is WAY to high for Bowser. I think Bowser just cause his weight is higher then Pichu...I think Pika is better than DK. Check with Gimpyfish about Bowser, he might actually be lower than Pichu.
Ok ok I will put Dk above Luigi. It that better?I've played a lot of good DK's and Dk is defiantly better.
Once again tournament results can prove this wrong, and current trends as well. Bum's DK has consistently ***** a lot of weekly's and such in NYC, and he recently placed FOURTH with all DK at MLG Long Island. He competed with PC Chris, M2K, Chu Dat, Isai, and many other huge pro's many of which he defeated.I dont think so. I know a few tournaments where they ban link and luigi for low tier cause they pwn the low tier and everyone uses them...
This theory is very wrong, you are saying that if one player does well and defeats many other pros then that character should move up.Once again tournament results can prove this wrong, and current trends as well. Bum's DK has consistently ***** a lot of weekly's and such in NYC, and he recently placed FOURTH with all DK at MLG Long Island. He competed with PC Chris, M2K, Chu Dat, Isai, and many other huge pro's many of which he defeated.
DK is getting the attention he needs these days, he is a very cheap character and when played with Bum his full potential is high enough to compete with the best pro's using the best characters.
they base if off of tournament resultsI don't really get how tiers work, can someone link me to a detailed explaintion of tiers. Because the way I see it is tiers = potential to be the best player. And with that logic Marth should be the best because Ken is the best and the ICs should be in the top 3 because Chu Dat is in the top 3.
Marth as played by Ken, Azen and M2k is amazing
I think Marth should be #1 or at LEAST #2 behind Fox.
I think Marth has proven that he is better then Falco and even Sheik.
Redragon
What's wrong with that logic, Marth has the most potential because the best player in the world plays as Marth the best, therefore Marth is better than all the characters.This theory is very wrong, you are saying that if one player does well and defeats many other pros then that character should move up.
So by your reasoning Marth should without a doubt be #1 cause Ken wins 95% of his tourneys!!!
Nope you need more reasons then just one player....
Redragon
first off, amazing triple post. YOU PULLED IT OFF!!! BUDDY!!!What's wrong with that logic, Marth has the most potential because the best player in the world plays as Marth the best, therefore Marth is better than all the characters.
I never said DK was better than anyone beyond Link. It's not a theory. DK has the ability to get fourth at major tournaments with the best pro's. DK is cheap. DK is better than Link.This theory is very wrong, you are saying that if one player does well and defeats many other pros then that character should move up.
So by your reasoning Marth should without a doubt be #1 cause Ken wins 95% of his tourneys!!!
Nope you need more reasons then just one player....
Redragon
dk sucks. hes not cheap. LOL.I never said DK was better than anyone beyond Link. It's not a theory. DK has the ability to get fourth at major tournaments with the best pro's. DK is cheap. DK is better than Link.
exactly.dk sucks. hes not cheap. LOL.
but i actually am starting to think this. dk is better than luigi for sure, and probably link as well. he should be top of low tier.
top 5 = exactly as it is right now.Triple posts for the win! Well 5150, can you tell me exactly what it's based off of and who you believe shuld be in the top 5.
name one please. (double post)exactly.
not cheap as a whole, but he has abuseable moves.
in order to get an uair you need to grab them 95% of the time. if dk could do this against space animals consistently hed be much higher on the tier list but unfortunately he cant.uair.
best juggle in the game?????????
OK, I still don't agree with it, if the best player plays as Marth the best then Marth has the most potential, period. But whatever you say, Where should DK be in relation to Luigi, Link and Roy?top 5 = exactly as it is right now.
tiers are based off of, basically, everything. thats what the "metagame" is. its a fancy word for what potential a char has, how chars are being used in tournaments (i guess a factor of potential), and how well they are doing in tournaments.
for example. if you go to a large tourney. a good 50% (probalby more honestly) of the "good players" will be using space animals. why? because once you have their tech down (which isn't too hard for most people to get down) then you are instantly a competitor at the high level because they are just great characters.
spacies have recently (starting a little before the new tier list was made) been kicking huge ***. not just individual players, but the entire group as a whole. however, individual players unlocked new fox tricks and tactics that helped him move up to the top of the list (kdj + mew2king).
mew2king and ken are not good examples of why marth should be top tier. they are savants at the game. same goes for bum. he is an amazing player but im sorry dk isn't good. you have to look at teh overall smash community, not just popular individuals.
wow long post on a dumb thread.
No it just means the best player likes using marth the most/ or feels more comfortable playing marth it doesn't mean he's the best. Chu uses y.link to counter peach, does that mean y.link is the best peach counter? No lr2reason.OK, I still don't agree with it, if the best player plays as Marth the best then Marth has the most potential, period. But whatever you say, Where should DK be in relation to Luigi, Link and Roy?
no you cant disagree with it because that's what tiers are. if you say you disagree then you are saying you disagree with tiers on a whole, which will make everyone laugh at you. also you prob need to go to a tourney to see what im talking about.OK, I still don't agree with it, if the best player plays as Marth the best then Marth has the most potential, period. But whatever you say, Where should DK be in relation to Luigi, Link and Roy?
@DK discussion
hmmm i would go as far as pushing him to bottom of middle. we can't have low tiers doing well in the metagame imo. it ruins the system!!!!!!
and ya you can pick at any move like dat... u gotta grab to get foxes uair too, sure you can fall on em, but you can with dk too i do it all the time, more towards the front of him than the center works like a charm. captain jack shffls uairs to start em up. you can pick at any move but the fact is uair can rack up 30-60 damage in seconds and at high percents its a guaranteed kill move w/ a grab yknow what im sayin. most chars dont have such a great move.
@c falcon
best combo game
no .this is wrong. please play more of the game thank you.
if youve gone a tournament and played against genericspaceanimalplayer43 you'll see how they are being used and how effective it is.OK. But let me get this straight tiers (according to 5150) are...
basically, everything. thats what the "metagame" is. its a fancy word for what potential a char has, how chars are being used in tournaments (i guess a factor of potential), and how well they are doing in tournaments.
I get it then, but I don't get what "how chars are being used in tournaments" means, does that mean popularity? I'm just trying to get a very detailed explaination of tiers before I actually contribute to this thread.
gg 2 uno .
I've been to one and I did see Space Animals owning, but I saw some good *** Marths. But your a great Shiek, and you know the game better than I do, so I'll take your word for it. I still don't like how tiers have to do with popularity. For anyone who plays pokemon netbattle here's a brief anology. Blissey is OU, but Chansey is BL. Which doesn't make sense, because Blissey is hardly better then Chansey. But technically Chansey should be in Never Used. Chansey should be in OU or a tier close to it. Anyways, I get the point, and it's understandble.if youve gone a tournament and played against genericspaceanimalplayer43 you'll see how they are being used and how effective it is.
gg 2 u