Ess oh Aytch
Smash Ace
... Wow. Falco is way more solid than Marth, pretty much dominating tons of match-ups. Okay, so your defense on Samus being higher than Falcon and Ice Climbers is her recovery?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Please stop.Haha, this post is the worst yet.
I think you meant: "Mud, be quiet, you seem to think you know this game, but you don't".
I like how, rather than actually provide reasoning, you've decided to just tell me that I don't know anything.
Then: "Don't make tierlists based on your opinion, make them based on character placing in tournaments".
You've put this point forward so many times, and I'm getting weary shooting it down each time. Sigh, try reading you ignoramus.
This is the only part that was somewhat coherant: "so I suggest get up from your couch and walk to one of local tourneys and get out a piece of paper and write down the results."
Dude, I've explained before why you can't just base a tierlist of tournament results. If you can't be bothered to read what I've put, that's your problem, not mine.
Exactly.Mud Buddah said:That's exactly the point I'm trying to make. Tournaments skew the view of things. Since all you see in tournaments are the top tiers, Pichu will obviously appear superior to Mewtwo purely because of those matchups.
Also, Controlfreak, he explained his point in the post you've just quoted. Mewtwo has more good matchups than Pichu. Meaning he has a better chance of winning against a random opponent than Pichu does.
That's exactly the point I'm trying to make. Tournaments skew the view of things. Since all you see in tournaments are the top tiers, Pichu will obviously appear superior to Mewtwo purely because of those matchups.
Also, Controlfreak, he explained his point in the post you've just quoted. Mewtwo has more good matchups than Pichu. Meaning he has a better chance of winning against a random opponent than Pichu does.
Bottom Tier:
Yoshi
Zelda
Mr. Game and Watch
Ness
Bowser
Kirby
Pichu
Mewtwo
Notice how he said all you play in tournaments are top tiers, that is the exact problem with the tier list being based primarily off tourney results. You basically will only see top tier characters and it is very likely you won't see a character like mewtwo at major tourneys (which I'm pretty sure are the only ones that count) so how do we know where mewtwo places on the tier list along with a bunch of other characters you probably won't see and if you do very little.Obviously Mew2 is better than Pichu, but in tournaments where Fox and Falco and Shieks are all you see, Pichu does better VS them than Mew2 does. Mew2 definitely has better matchups overall, but VS top tiers(which is all you play in tournaments) Pichu does better.
He's only posted Since the beggining of Augest but teh man speaks truth..Here is the true "tier list" (perhaps you'll adopt it in 2007).
Fox > Everyone, if that players skill is > everyone else.
Fox<Everyone, if that players skill is < everyone else.
Link>Everyone, if this player's skill is > everyone else.
Link< Everyone, if this players skill is < everyone else.
falco>everyone, if this player's skill is > everyone else.
falco<everyone, if that player's skill is < everyone else.
etc. 23 more times.
Look, I know someone that is insane with melee, and I used to determine if they were good by who they play with. And he said mewtwo and I laughed, never again will I determine if a player sucks by what character they use. As far as showing which characters the top players use most, I don't have a problem with that. But it should be called top tournament character results, not tier list.
Here is the true "tier list" (perhaps you'll adopt it in 2007).
Fox > Everyone, if that players skill is > everyone else.
Fox<Everyone, if that players skill is < everyone else.
Link>Everyone, if this player's skill is > everyone else.
Link< Everyone, if this players skill is < everyone else.
falco>everyone, if this player's skill is > everyone else.
falco<everyone, if that player's skill is < everyone else.
etc. 23 more times.
Look, I know someone that is insane with melee, and I used to determine if they were good by who they play with. And he said mewtwo and I laughed, never again will I determine if a player sucks by what character they use. As far as showing which characters the top players use most, I don't have a problem with that. But it should be called top tournament character results, not tier list.
Nope, wrong.He's only posted Since the beggining of Augest but teh man speaks truth..
Smashfan's Brain > Everyone, since Smashfan's Brain > Everyone Else
Mud Buddha < Everyone, since Mud Buddha's Brain < Everyone Else
Mindgames is skill >_>Nope, wrong.
Mind games>Skill
No it's not.Mindgames is skill >_>
No... mindgames and skill are the same.. When you talk about people like Drephen, and Dope do you say.. "dang, those guys have mad skills..." or do you say "dang, those guys have no skill, but amazing mindgames"No it's not.
Skill is skill.
Mind games are mind games.
Please stop.No... mindgames and skill are the same.. When you talk about people like Drephen, and Dope do you say.. "dang, those guys have mad skills..." or do you say "dang, those guys have no skill, but amazing mindgames"
Technical Skill+Mindgames... Yes. Skill overall... No. Don't try to tell me i don't have enough tournament experience.. You've only been to one more tournament than me. and we have been to quite a few. <_<Chozen >< wtf you know skill and mind games are diffrent.....
Anyone with Enough tourney experince knows this
You can only get so good technically.Technical skill and skill are two different things. Skill is a combination of Mindgames+Technical skill, that is why people specify the difference between skill and technical skill. With Mindgames comes technical skill, and vice versa.
Yes, they are both part of this game all the same, however they together make up one's overall skill. There is also a limit to one's mindgames as well, no one has just reached it yet..You can only get so good technically.
Mind games are different every stock.
And since when has strategy not required skill, in any game?It's stragety it requires no skill
Good man *gives thumbs up*And since when has strategy not required skill, in any game?
Well let's see um Tetris? Ummm Mario, DKC. Racing game.And since when has strategy not required skill, in any game?
skill:Well let's see um Tetris? Ummm Mario, DKC. Racing game.
i wish you were right. but if you were, every character would have a good chance. this only works if that player's skill is FAR greater than everyone else's. if skill is not far greater, than it only works for some characters.Here is the true "tier list" (perhaps you'll adopt it in 2007).
Fox > Everyone, if that players skill is > everyone else.
Fox<Everyone, if that players skill is < everyone else.
Link>Everyone, if this player's skill is > everyone else.
Link< Everyone, if this players skill is < everyone else.
falco>everyone, if this player's skill is > everyone else.
falco<everyone, if that player's skill is < everyone else.
etc. 23 more times.
Look, I know someone that is insane with melee, and I used to determine if they were good by who they play with. And he said mewtwo and I laughed, never again will I determine if a player sucks by what character they use. As far as showing which characters the top players use most, I don't have a problem with that. But it should be called top tournament character results, not tier list.
my post on page 6 I think. explaines how the japanese have no tier list and gives you captain jack's tierlist, which is as close as you can get.anyone know japan's tier list?
What the **** is this? Do you think you're "cool" enough to get away without actually posting anything of substance ? It's not funny, no one else here thinks it's funny. Please stop.Please stop.
Because other types of matches. However little it may be, it still gives an impression of how well they fare. The point that you have made is exactly why they are harder to place than the top bunch.Notice how he said all you play in tournaments are top tiers, that is the exact problem with the tier list being based primarily off tourney results. You basically will only see top tier characters and it is very likely you won't see a character like mewtwo at major tourneys (which I'm pretty sure are the only ones that count) so how do we know where mewtwo places on the tier list along with a bunch of other characters you probably won't see and if you do very little.
This my point exactly.Let me ask you something if all you ever saw at a major tourney was one Mewtwo and the Mewtwo did horrible do you just put Mewtwo at bottom of bottom cause of how that mewtwo placed? If this is the case than the tier list is a major assumption. Perhaps the reason falco and fox place so high in tourneys is cause there are so many of them that they are basically going against themselves. If mewtwo has more better matchups than pichu than he should be higher than pichu. If pichu places higher no matter the circumstance I think he is "better" than mewtwo. But in tourneys you still see a lot of peaches, marths, captain falcons. So does this mean Pichu does better against these characters as well?
Dude, what? I've shown several times the bredth of my knowledge, and you still want to come to that? Why did you even post that? As far as I can recall I haven't ever done anything to make you want to lash out at me.Mud Buddha < Everyone, since Mud Buddha's Brain < Everyone Else
I don't disagree with the tier list I disagree with how people say its based off tourney results when it is actually based only on how good characters are.the tier list looks pretty **** perfect to me... except for perhaps roy over dk but then again who cares... that's one spot.
i don't get all the fuss over tiers. they exist because the characters are different, xD.
vicious, it's not based on tournament results. it may look that way, but the characters are where they are because of the people who play best with them.
anyways, mindgames over matter. all hail taj's mewtwo
I actually find him pretty **** hilarious. >_>MudBuddah said:Quote:
Originally Posted by DooTheDah View Post
Please stop.
What the **** is this? Do you think you're "cool" enough to get away without actually posting anything of substance ? It's not funny, no one else here thinks it's funny. Please stop.
The main reason it's not based on how good characters are is the lower half of the tier list, those charaters are mainly based on how well they do agasin't the highest characters (which everyone plays). Someone playing Bowser may be able to own someone playing Yoshi or G&W but they will do far worse against someone playing fox than yoshi or G&W. This is how it is based of tournament results and why when people complain that character A is better than character B it doesn't matter because it's how they've done in tourneys, it may have been that for the past year only crap links have entered tourneys so it's lower it's got nothing to do with how good acharacter is unless you look at the top of the list and even then it's still not perfect.I don't disagree with the tier list I disagree with how people say its based off tourney results when it is actually based only on how good characters are.
It is based on tournaments. See post 8 of this thread.I don't disagree with the tier list I disagree with how people say its based off tourney results when it is actually based only on how good characters are.
just gonna add my two cents here, dunno if anyone really cares, my main game is Street Fighter 3: 3rd Strike anyways. Anyway, a tier list shouldn't be based off of tournament results, if you ask me that's just ********. If you base a tier list off of tournament results you're ranking people not the characters. .