StripesOrBars
Smash Master
Dammit, I have nothing to drink now.
<3 Pepsi
<3 Pepsi
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Dammit, I have nothing to drink now.
<3 Pepsi
Doodah.I play with the best Gannon in the world I know what Gannon can do.
Edit: not talking to u mood
Pepesi gave half it's check to orphans...pepsi is low tier
LOL, since you know what a good Gannon is LOL.Doodah.
You always cheer me up with your funny posts.
I think Fox should be lower, like in low tier, just under Kirby. That's mostly me just hating Fox's tail.I kinda think Y. Link should be closer to regular link, but thats mostly personal opinion and me hating the slowness of Link...
seriously you should just use this to answer ANY question tier related, and then just quit listening to anything anyone saysHe has a better meta-game then his younger self lol.
how does uairing someone in a parachute have to do with peaches?^ If you don't DI and mix up Fast-Falling.
Watch Mike G's or Vidjo's Peach....or play a good Peach
Links Uair is way way way better then y.Links.how does uairing someone in a parachute have to do with peaches?
what KO move does link have that young link doesn't? other than up b. or is it cause all of links moves are just stronger so it's like link in a .7 damage ratio match?
i'm talking about recovery after you regain control of the character. would you rather have a parachute to slow you down against someone with a gun or fall at a fast speed (assuming you live after the fall)
I'd rather keep the parachute and hit the guy that has a gun with it, G&W style.
Now that's gangsta.
Lol in case you didn't notice I was joking in that post.no you can't cause he would uair you
i know. i was joking tooLol in case you didn't notice I was joking in that post.
Well, thats like me saying I suck with fox, so fox must suck.. then I can go up against any fox and say your character sucks becuase I suck with fox... then they will **** me.. I mean, normally, Ness will not be able to beat a fox, but for the longest time, Ness would have been considered my top tier... so therefore my ness should be better than any other character...I don't see why you people even bother.
All TRUE tier lists are only intra-personal.
Hahahaha.Rose said:I hope this topic doesn't get filled with n00b bull**** like how Ness needs to be higher because he has "potential" or how "tiers mean nothing."
Very trueFalco is the best character in the game, not Fox.
To StripesOrBars, you don't pay attention well .
Why thank you sir. I think my post on the first page should be read by all newcomers thinking of posting on this thread.How about you people actually read and get a clue as to what the tier list represents. Go to the first page, skim past the tier list, read the other stuff, like the post by foxandfalco where he quotes AlphaZealot and The King. Then maybe you'll stop making yourself look like an idiot (fat chance).
ken is the only marth player that places as high as he doesduh
simna god 33rd place using only ness in oc2
ken, using mostly marth, has gotten first (or near first i dunno) in all the tournements he went to recently
on the first page, foxandfalco's quotes said that the new tier list is based mostly on tournament results, so i think ness and marth should be higher
Uh, false.duh
simna god 33rd place using only ness in oc2
ken, using mostly marth, has gotten first (or near first i dunno) in all the tournements he went to recently
on the first page, foxandfalco's quotes said that the new tier list is based mostly on tournament results, so i think ness and marth should be higher
My friend I agree with you hands down these guy speaks the true.Uh, false.
Even if the tier list is based mostly on tournament results (which I don't really think it is in the sense that you're talking about), you can't simply look at the MLGs or the really major tournaments because people like Ken and Chu go to them and keep winning them.
You can't make a narrow observation like that and then attempt to apply it to the whole. How many Ken's are there? How many Chu's are there? How many Simna's are there?
Not to mention that Ken keeps a mean Fox in reserve, and actually uses it a lot.
My opinion on the statement that "the tier list is based off tournament results" is that it's not just based on placing, but the people winning the major tournies are generally playing the characters at the heights of their abilities, so you get a sense as to what a character can/can't do, and how they stack up against the other characters in the game.
However, I think arguing over anything more than a general list is STUPID because you will never get people to agree. Instead, you'll end up with 45 pages of "Fox is better than Falco because Pichu counters Fox but only if C. Falcon blah blah blah."
There's a general consensus on which characters are good, which ones are decent, and which ones are terrible. After that, it's pointless to argue anymore unless somebody comes up with something revolutionary for a character (like wavedashing did with Luigi and the Icys).
That's not how mcc meant it mood. Here, you say that Chu Dat (one man) inspired others (multiple people) and helped bring IC up while he means it in the sense that one man "alone" can change a character's placingit has, chu dat, but it's because he inspired other people to use the ICs, but in reality, it will only be affected by one person if other people start seeing what the character can do in the right hands
I guess you can say that already happened with Bombsoldier's videos and the sudden rise of numerous good Falco players afterwards.if someone DOES find something revolutionary for a bottom tier character, would the tier list change or would it have to wait till next year