REL38
Smash Lord
My laptop is crapping out on me n' I don't wanna respond using my phone, so I leave you with this:
Proof Bowser can move with those impenetratable scales
This more so relates to what Sam n' Pluvia are talkin' bout', but w/e
Edit:
It's like I'm on dial-up or something :/
As I said, I more so meant how a character works internally should be ignored.
Instead, we should bring about to question what abilities or actions they possess.
Ex. fire breathe, electrical based weaponry, flight
Proof Bowser can move with those impenetratable scales
This more so relates to what Sam n' Pluvia are talkin' bout', but w/e
Edit:
It's like I'm on dial-up or something :/
Originally posted by Marthage's annoying manner in responding to posts
Like who? Pikmin are the only combatants that have that anatomical flaw, every other character follows one cellular system. Do not confuse extreme anthropomorphism with anatomical failure.
I more so meant on a broad term when it comes to a character's inner workings. How they survive and function.
For lack of a better term, I used anatomy when I should have used a phrase instead.
We should argue who would kick the other's arse
Not who has the necessary White Blood cell count or being too tall for blood to reach Ganon's brain.
You should when they're the only character subject to this and it becomes a flaw that sticks them with Kirby, Meta Knight, DDD and the like.
All of which were screwed just cuz they don't seem to follow the inner workings of the typical Earthlyorganism.
Being aliens leaves countless possibilities for how they have inner workings that can be dramatically different than your typical dog.
"If they don't gots this and this, they don't work"
As if an alien beings would really have lungs and kidneys like everything else here on Earth.
Oh, and I suppose muscular degeneration and the rest issue wasn't a case of extremism? Inner workings weren't questioned. How their style of living brought about how climbing mountains could potentially harm their muscles. Something intact to begin with.
I'm guessing it wasn't extremism whenever Jigglypuff, Kirby and MK were lol-phailed?Physically, perhaps
But internally, they should not have been.
I'm guessing it wasn't extremism that took away fire breath?The ability was brought up to question. Not the character.
I'm guessing it wasn't extremism that predominated round 4.5?No, it was Fanboyism Parade Week
I'm guessing it wasn't extremism that harried Mewtwo vs. SamusIf you were referring to the canon battles, those were terrible. Canon battles were merely to appease to the one's who wanted a kid creating huge explosions with his mind and other completely non-realistic traits.
I'm guessing it wasn't extremism for Diddy and Peach getting the most unorthodox items at their disposal. Inner workings weren't questioned.
Canon abilites checked out to realistically work.
I'm guessing it wasn't extremism that got Samus super buffed.I like how you ignore the context of "extremism" in my post . . . . referring to how stuff works with the statement above it.
Still being part of the previous statment and relating to it.
I'm guessing it wasn't extremism for people to pull the "monkey rage" card for DK.Out of context . . . . yet again . . . .
I'm guessing it wasn't extremism that Sam and I were forced by the anti-pika side to explain Pika's electricity down to a cellular level just to make it plausible.The ability was questioned.
No one argued that Pikachu isn't capable of functioning.
No one bought Pika could produce lethal amounts of electricity and smugged what you guys had to say in the end . . . until a plausible reasoning for how Pikachu could create electricity was brought about.
Not entirely sound, but plausible enough for Pikachu to actually use it.
Yet it is extremism for me to bring the pikmin down to an anatomical level.
<_<
As I said, I more so meant how a character works internally should be ignored.
Instead, we should bring about to question what abilities or actions they possess.
Ex. fire breathe, electrical based weaponry, flight