Xandercosm
Smash Lord
There was never a Roy debate lol. We pretty much all agreed Roy is trash.Let's not start another Roy debate.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
There was never a Roy debate lol. We pretty much all agreed Roy is trash.Let's not start another Roy debate.
I wouldn't say so but regardless of what was agreed on, we don't need to do it again before the next voting phase even starts...There was never a Roy debate lol. We pretty much all agreed Roy is trash.
To be fair, I can see where he is coming from. Roy's results on a national level are weak, but he does okay in locals and regionals. I still agree with your post though.What? Where did you hear that?
1. Here's a spread sheet from the Roy forums themselves.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1uINVBF6g0H0zixaQp1oYkYZgg4oMPD4Wf5wlGZpDOq0/edit#gid=0
2. He isn't even Bottom 5 when it comes to Bracket Presence:
http://smashboards.com/rankings/smash-for-wii-u.8/league/teams
3. And his recent brackets aren't even that awful.
http://smashboards.com/rankings/smash-for-wii-u.8/league/team?rank=0&value=0&team=roy
For instance, he got 2nd at a regional with 69 in attendance and on a solo run.
(Although, even the Roy players did concede that the buffs have probably made Marth a stronger character than him.)
Please guys. A lot of stuff in regards to Roy was well covered on page 260. Let's not start another Roy debate.
Luigi? Luigi is still cool. He can still do things. It's a shame none of his players seem to attend or place in nationals now, but he still has his combo game, great Nair, surprisingly good recovery when used well, fast smashes etc.Wow...Roy is trash huh?
How does Luigi fare now?
But is she mid tier after all this?I still love how got a notable result after her buffs (9th at FOW Saga, courtesy of Jonny Westside) and yet she's still getting downvoted. Just sayin'.
This guy understands. Why do people continue to upvote characters with multiple upvotes already?I'd also vote up, but it seems that everyone else has already done it for me.
People can say what they like about Skeik. Yeah, she struggles killing a lot of the time, but she still has moves into BF confirms, Ftilt to Uair, arguably the safest neutral, and one of the best recoveries. And on top of this, she's still getting results (take Pound for example). I don't think it's time to count Sheik down and out just yet.-1 - Sheik is still a very good character, but I don't quite think she belongs up there.
I don't think they're excluding her as a threat, they just don't think she's top tier anymore after her most recent nerfs, which I would agree with. She's certainly top 10, and she may even be 5th, but putting her in top tier is saying a bit much after her reliable kill setups off a grab are now gone.People can say what they like about Skeik. Yeah, she struggles killing a lot of the time, but she still has moves into BF confirms, Ftilt to Uair, arguably the safest neutral, and one of the best recoveries. And on top of this, she's still getting results (take Pound for example). I don't think it's time to count Sheik down and out just yet.
That's exactly my thoughts. She's definitely still a threat in the metagame and a hard matchup for many characters, but she's not exactly a Tier 1 character without her kill setups. In my opinion, she should be the first character of Tier 2. She's still a great character and a very viable pick, but not quite Tier 1 worthy at the moment. Whether or not that changes is yet to be seen.I don't think they're excluding her as a threat, they just don't think she's top tier anymore after her most recent nerfs, which I would agree with. She's certainly top 10, and she may even be 5th, but putting her in top tier is saying a bit much after her reliable kill setups off a grab are now gone.
I think she's still top tier as I usually think of top tier characters being top 15 or top 10 in the game, not top 3.I don't think they're excluding her as a threat, they just don't think she's top tier anymore after her most recent nerfs, which I would agree with. She's certainly top 10, and she may even be 5th, but putting her in top tier is saying a bit much after her reliable kill setups off a grab are now gone.
True to my word, I'm gonna replace my Pac-Man vote with a Kirby up vote since I'm getting worried Kirby might fall too far.1:
2:
3:()
4
5:
6:
7:
-1 People just think Link should be here because they either don't know how bad his flaws are for so little strength, or just don't want to admit Link is bad yet again.
-1I'm surprised nobody has noticed this yet. Samus doesn't have the theory to be this good, nor the matchup spread or results. She got voted a little too much a few period ago and then nobody bothered to vote her down.
+1What the hell??? Pac-Man's projectile tricks, being hard to approach when going aganist him ,his good specials, jab, dash attack, and aierals, pretty good smashes, good recovery, and pretty good matchup spread for a high tier (Assuming high tier is like tiers 3 and 4; people have differant prespectives.) makes me think this is defitenly way off.
+1You know what I want to say.
-1 Holy crap when are people gonna realize that his matchup spread is terrible for a high tier and that his theory and results aren't even THIS good either.
I might replace a vote with a up vote too, since I'm worried people might down vote him and he'll end up too low. But I'll risk it for now.
I don't think they're excluding her as a threat, they just don't think she's top tier anymore after her most recent nerfs, which I would agree with. She's certainly top 10, and she may even be 5th, but putting her in top tier is saying a bit much after her reliable kill setups off a grab are now gone.
Most certainly, I agree with your replies 100%. Sheik most likely isn't in the very top tier right now, but is definitely within the top 10.That's exactly my thoughts. She's definitely still a threat in the metagame and a hard matchup for many characters, but she's not exactly a Tier 1 character without her kill setups. In my opinion, she should be the first character of Tier 2. She's still a great character and a very viable pick, but not quite Tier 1 worthy at the moment. Whether or not that changes is yet to be seen.
Oh, don't be like that. You're in charge, you're not obligated to update upon our request.Sorry for the delay on this.
Very, very true. I'm going to edit my votes post to switch my upvote to a upvote, because I don't want Bayo in her own tier again. Plus, I was on the fence about a upvote to begin with.I'd also vote up, but it seems that everyone else has already done it for me.
The Miis, like many characters, suffer because they are so unpopular that people don't care enough to vote for them. But that changes in the second round where people vote for all characters within a tier meaning they have to vote for the miis one way or the other. It is then than the pro-mii arguments will actually be listened to, because so much of the discussion about top tiers is no longer happening.All you need to do to fix Miis placing is to make them all go up 1 tier. I mean for strawberries sake they are not that bad. And we are talking about Any size XXXX (It seems to be just way too strawberry hard to understand we are not voting Guest 1111 set). Even Guest XXXX ones would be higher than they are now placed. Call me biased call me crazy, but when you look at the theory no Mii should be lower than Link. Yes Link has results, but the MU spread and theory is overall worse than on any Mii.
Once again I am forced to vote all Miis up. Rest of the Tier list is almost done. It is just that these 3 guys are STILL underrated heavily due to lack of rep.
+
+
+
+
And now looking at the first votes I have to ask what makes you guys think that should be lower and higher? I'm just so strawberry curious about you opinions.
Due to counter voting being ineffective I have to waste my last vote to...
+
Yes I have seen what a Mac is able to do. He has frame data, results (placing in top 10 in regionals and getting in top 25 in Beast 6), and the MU spread is far from horrible. He is amazing counterpick character that is hindered by stagelist. Little Mac has been doing a lot better in more "liberal" stagelists (more than 7 stages legal).
And sorry I'm rather pissed off atm...
WHAAAAT?! I BELIEVED IN YOU!