apparently fuz
legendary doesn't fit me.
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2015
- Messages
- 1,095
- Location
- London, England
- NNID
- googlemynumber
- 3DS FC
- 1908-0730-5856
EDIT: Ignore this.
Last edited:
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Oh right, that's cool.I might be a little picky, but I don't think she's second best in the game currently. Some of the nerfs have gotten rid of some of her niche things, and made her somewhat bad at the late game when it comes to closing out stocks. I don't know, I may change it however as I still believe that she's in the top 5 area.
You just typed up a pointless rant.1:
2:
3:(
)
4:
5:
6:
7:
- Link above Kirby, Samus, Falco, Dr. Mario, Bowser Jr, Shulk, Duck Hunt, Bowser, Game & Watch, Mii Gunner, Mii Swordfighter, Palutena, and Charizard
- Kirby below Lucas, Marcina, Link, etc and being in 40th
- Mr. Game & Watch below Bowser, Shulk, Falco, Bowser Jr., Samus, Dr. Mario, and ROY
- Lucas and Robin being above WFT, Peach, Olimar, Mega Man, Wario, and Marcina
- ROY not even being in BOTTOM 15, let alone bottom 5
- Duck Hunt being in bottom 5
- Sonic being in tier 3
- Ryu in top 5
- Rosa and ZSS being above Bayo and Diddy
- Cloud below Ryu and Sheik
- DK in top 25
- Rob in 23rd
- Marth above WFT and Wario
- Jigglypuff in dead last
- Dedede not in the lowest tier
- Charizard being below Little Mac
- Mii Gunner and Mii Swordfighter in bottom ten despite having all moves available
- Meta Knight below Ness and Mewtwo
- Ness above Villager
-1
- Luigi so low
Do I even need to say it.
+1Even aganist
(Not fully sure on Ness, but that seems to be the general idea for both Ness and Kirby mains) And i've heard people suggest
as even too, and he beats
. I'm sure I'm missing somebody but whatever. Solid matchup spread (It would be at least high tier worthy if it weren't for
and perhaps
but just Sonic being removed would make it high tier spread probably), great aierals, throws, combos, inhale, tilts, and stuff, many top player upsets or last game last hits (Larry Lurr, Mr. R, Void, Vinnie, and Nairo are all in this) category) and generally good results too. Link being better than Kirby is for glory little mac-levels of stupidity.
+1I don't feel like explaining this AGAIN, if you want a reason go reply and ask why I upvoted him.
-19B decided that Ryu wasn't good enough for him, and performs better now that he uses Bayo. If that isn't good enough for you, then let me tell you this:Theory and results are in no way top 5. This isn't a TAS tier list.
-1Roy is not our boy. When miis get all moves, Roy becomes bottom 5 for sure. This makes no sense
There's like a billion other things I hate about this version, but ugh, once again
This guy gets the fact that Shulk is better than where he is, Shulk just has NO representation to prove many people'Oh wow. Roy and Robin (and I guess everyone else that I didn't notice) rose up by a petty major amount of spots. Anyway...
+
I'm still believing that Shulk is better than where he is, even though I'm not an expert on him.
I personally think Puff is last. She really has little results/any rep, and I honestly think her theory is quite meh. Yes, Zelda's theory is also meh, but she has Ven. If there is some notable Puff main, tell me.1:
2:
3:(
)
4:
5:
6:
7:
- Link above Kirby, Samus, Falco, Dr. Mario, Bowser Jr, Shulk, Duck Hunt, Bowser, Game & Watch, Mii Gunner, Mii Swordfighter, Palutena, and Charizard
- Kirby below Lucas, Marcina, Link, etc and being in 40th
- Mr. Game & Watch below Bowser, Shulk, Falco, Bowser Jr., Samus, Dr. Mario, and ROY
- Lucas and Robin being above WFT, Peach, Olimar, Mega Man, Wario, and Marcina
- ROY not even being in BOTTOM 15, let alone bottom 5
- Duck Hunt being in bottom 5
- Sonic being in tier 3
- Ryu in top 5
- Rosa and ZSS being above Bayo and Diddy
- Cloud below Ryu and Sheik
- DK in top 25
- Rob in 23rd
- Marth above WFT and Wario
- Jigglypuff in dead last
- Dedede not in the lowest tier
- Charizard being below Little Mac
- Mii Gunner and Mii Swordfighter in bottom ten despite having all moves available
- Meta Knight below Ness and Mewtwo
- Ness above Villager
- Luigi so low
-1Do I even need to say it.
+1Even aganist
(Not fully sure on Ness, but that seems to be the general idea for both Ness and Kirby mains) And i've heard people suggest
as even too, and he beats
. I'm sure I'm missing somebody but whatever. Solid matchup spread (It would be at least high tier worthy if it weren't for
and perhaps
but just Sonic being removed would make it high tier spread probably), great aierals, throws, combos, inhale, tilts, and stuff, many top player upsets or last game last hits (Larry Lurr, Mr. R, Void, Vinnie, and Nairo are all in this) category) and generally good results too. Link being better than Kirby is for glory little mac-levels of stupidity.
+1I don't feel like explaining this AGAIN, if you want a reason go reply and ask why I upvoted him.
-19B decided that Ryu wasn't good enough for him, and performs better now that he uses Bayo. If that isn't good enough for you, then let me tell you this:Theory and results are in no way top 5. This isn't a TAS tier list.
-1Roy is not our boy. When miis get all moves, Roy becomes bottom 5 for sure. This makes no sense
There's like a billion other things I hate about this version, but ugh, once again
![]()
Also, they are ranked within tiers. If they get less than the votes needed to move up/down a tier, they move up/down in the tier they are in.You just typed up a pointless rant.
Fighters aren't ranked within tiers. For all we know, Villager could be at the top of Tier 2 and above Ness (he isn't), but since fighters' only rankings are only equal to whatever tier they're in, there's no diverse ranking system. There's no 40th, there's no 33rd--hell, there's no 1st at this point.
Right now, the only rankings are the tiers. In this phase, consider everyone in Tier 1 equal, everyone in tier 2 equal, etc. Meaning everyone in Tier 1 ranks 1/7. Once this phase ends, we rank within tiers. No reason to complain.
Speaking of complaining...
Those images are giant and annoying. Please don't post them when you don't need to, or at least have the decency to hide them in a spoiler.
Thank you.
Please, everyone. Read the rules before voting!-(How did he get so high all of a sudden? In front of
and
of all things?)
-(She should be behind
but still in Tier 1)
+(She should be at the front of Tier 1)
+(He shouldn't be that low. At least right behind
)
+(She's still godly. At least the bottom of Tier 1 in order to allow
to be the top of Tier 2)
I could have sworn Browny said something like what I said. NVMPlease, everyone. Read the rules before voting!
Take the post above for example. This user has perfectly logical opinions, most of which I agree with, but the idea is wrong.
We are not voting individual places, we are voting for the correct tier for a character. Lets say we -1 Rosalina. That's not a vote to say she should go down one place in her tier, it's a vote for her to go down a whole tier. The rules state that currently, characters are not ordered in their tiers. This is just the tier placement phase. The next phase is where we will worry about individual placements.
So, for example, while this user for example stating that he want's Rosalina below ZSS but still in tier 1, his minus vote does not show that, as the way we are voting currently, it means that he thinks Rosalina should be in tier 2 (which is clearly not the case, as he stated it).
Yea, didn't think about the picture. I'll change that now.You just typed up a pointless rant.
Fighters aren't ranked within tiers. For all we know, Villager could be at the top of Tier 2 and above Ness (he isn't), but since fighters' only rankings are only equal to whatever tier they're in, there's no diverse ranking system. There's no 40th, there's no 33rd--hell, there's no 1st at this point.
Right now, the only rankings are the tiers. In this phase, consider everyone in Tier 1 equal, everyone in tier 2 equal, etc. Meaning everyone in Tier 1 ranks 1/7. Once this phase ends, we rank within tiers. No reason to complain.
Speaking of complaining...
Those images are giant and annoying. Please don't post them when you don't need to, or at least have the decency to hide them in a spoiler.
Thank you.
No.Yea, didn't think about the picture. I'll change that now.
Also, Browny said something about ordering them in tiers this time.
Soon...UPDATED
Now there was a lot of activity in this thread because of Pound so a lot more movement then normal, I expect that to settle down quickly so I can start on voting for each individual tier but that still may be a few weeks away.
By that he means like only tier 1, or only tier 2. I know for a fact he mentioned what winter said.No.
Soon...
As for now, still voting for character tier placements people. If a character looks like in a spot in the tier you don't like, don't worry about it. I personally feel Marth is too low in his tier, but he's in the tier I think he should be in, so that's fantastic. I can argue my point on why he should be higher up later on when we get around to individual placements.
Around 1.1.4, I've been hearing things like he's neglected because the patch gave range buffs to the swordsmen (Ike and Marthcina iirc). Alongside Cloud, it's apparently confirmed that Shulk's just invalidated.This guy gets the fact that Shulk is better than where he is, Shulk just has NO representation to prove many people'
s beliefs . I appreciate your belief in Shulk and I hope to improve his meta-game a good margin. I see the potential (Good range, basically 5 characters in one, and his very own special tech called MALLC) and while i do see the negatives (HUGE learning curve, not lots of approach options, Very bad end lag on most moves, very bad start up lag on most moves) i think that the positives outweigh the negatives.
As a Shulk main myself, I believe he has the potential to improve, but we can't really justify moving him up any higher until we actually see someone do something with him. I believe Tier 5 is a fair placement for him at the moment. He's not bottom tier, but we have yet to see much of him, preventing him from being any higher. I think the thing that really draws people away from Shulk is that, let's be real, he's not that good. The absolute best case scenario I can see for him is being high-mid tier because, assuming someone comes along and actually does stuff with him, they can only take his metagame to a certain point. At that point, his terrible frame data will just prevent him from climbing any higher on a tier list (unless buffs have something to say about that and I really hope they do). Shulk just isn't in the best of spots right now to cause our dream Shulk player that proves his potential to come along and wreck everyone. The two other long-ranged swordsmen (Cloud and Ike) are leagues ahead of him due to their significantly better frame data and combos. They're also much more forgiving than he is. You have to play perfect as Shulk. You just have to. There is no other option. If you make a mistake, you're going to be taking a load of percent from your opponent's combo and there's nothing you can do about it except try and DI out because Shulk's frame data is trash. Sadly, unless you either a) like him as a character from Xenoblade or b) REALLY like his Monado Arts gimmick, I see no reason to use Shulk competitively. If you want to play a long-ranged swordsman, just play Cloud or Ike. Why would you play as a significantly worse long-ranged swordsman who you have to play absolutely perfect with when there's two better, easier, and much more forgiving options available?This guy gets the fact that Shulk is better than where he is, Shulk just has NO representation to prove many people'
s beliefs . I appreciate your belief in Shulk and I hope to improve his meta-game a good margin. I see the potential (Good range, basically 5 characters in one, and his very own special tech called MALLC) and while i do see the negatives (HUGE learning curve, not lots of approach options, Very bad end lag on most moves, very bad start up lag on most moves) i think that the positives outweigh the negatives.
I GOT IT I FOUND IT. That took like 30 minutes, but yeah.Sorry, yeah I got caught up with work last few days staying up way late, updating now.
cloud roy lucina +1
pikachu ryu -1
UPDATED
I am also now attempting to rank characters within tiers. Basically anyone who gets +4, +3 or -2 in their total votes will move within the tier around any characters that for within -1 or +2 range
My bPlease, everyone. Read the rules before voting!
Take the post above for example. This user has perfectly logical opinions, most of which I agree with, but the idea is wrong.
We are not voting individual places, we are voting for the correct tier for a character. Lets say we -1 Rosalina. That's not a vote to say she should go down one place in her tier, it's a vote for her to go down a whole tier. The rules state that currently, characters are not ordered in their tiers. This is just the tier placement phase. The next phase is where we will worry about individual placements.
So, for example, while this user for example stating that he want's Rosalina below ZSS but still in tier 1, his minus vote does not show that, as the way we are voting currently, it means that he thinks Rosalina should be in tier 2 (which is clearly not the case, as he stated it).
Just a friendly reminder to everyone.
Probably was not able to read my post, but scroll up for Browny's thing.My b
Can I try this again then?
-(Not sure how he got to Tier 1)
+(Still in the top 5 imo since she is still getting good results after nerfs)
+(Hasn't been doing great lately but he has more results than the other characters in this tier. More top 8 placements than
so he should go to Tier 2)
-(She is not in the same tier as
, sorry husbandos)
-(No one plays the Miis)
Thank you for correcting me on that, andAlso, they are ranked within tiers. If they get less than the votes needed to move up/down a tier, they move up/down in the tier they are in.
Educate me, please.+Possibly the most underrated character in the game. His neutral is weak and he's light, but he has so much going for him that I can't see him staying this low.
The first two issues I have acknowledged, and those are the ones I feel keep him from being higher than mid tier. But the other problems you mentioned aren'tt as bad as you make them out to be:Educate me, please.
While I do I agree he's not Bottom 10, he's certainly not that underrated. I think his major flaws keep him from ever going higher than low mid.
His nonexistent neutral, very low survivability, terrible killing issues, poor projectile, lack of safe options on shield, and several horrible high and top tier matchups keep him from going that much higher in my eyes.
I will admit, I do think he could be a decent counterpick character, as he does surprisingly good in a few high and top tier matchups (Bayo, Pika, and Mario come to mind) and that he does have some strengths that I do think a few people overlook.
![]()
I did not know we could do that. Good idea.Voted down Puff because I honestly feel like she should be in her own tier.
Actually Mii Brawler got top 16 at a pretty big European tournament last week (@Yikarur also got 5th in this tournament using Mii Brawler as a secondary). Since the voting is for Miis of any size and any moveset, there won't be a lot of tournament representation for the Miis since it isn't allowed in most tournaments.My b
Can I try this again then?
-(Not sure how he got to Tier 1)
+(Still in the top 5 imo since she is still getting good results after nerfs)
+(Hasn't been doing great lately but he has more results than the other characters in this tier. More top 8 placements than
so he should go to Tier 2)
-(She is not in the same tier as
, sorry husbandos)
-(No one plays the Miis)
She's in a significantly worse spot than everyone else in the game right now, and has a complete lack of actual high level representation bar RDR7. That's just my two cents anyway.I'm curious, why do you guys think Jigglypuff should be in her own tier now? Just seems kind of random.