All I'm saying is that Sonic is pretty good proof Directs trump other forms of reveals, including reveals close to the date and VC releases or anniversaries (which we still don't know for sure actually effects when a character is revealed). They have a much higher level of reception than a simple update on the site, so obviously Nintendo and Sakurai are going to take advantage of that when they can. Unless the Direct is based primarily around Smash, or at least has more than a veteran reveal, it's unlikely they're scheduled around Smash, they just want to take advantage of their viewership with promotion. Sure, the Directs aren't as important as... a Nintendo conference or something, but they are bigger deals than simple website updates, so yeah, they will be given precedence when it comes to reveals. That's all.
Well, taking a look at Sonic, he was first announced in a direct for For. What makes this notable is that he's a guy who wasn't a beyond obvious return(likely, though). He's a special character, as Sakurai mentioned, since all Third Parties are special.
I don't consider Sonic being announced to mean much for the pattern. I do consider the regular characters to mean a lot. Since Sonic was always special, I don't think it matters that he was announced outside of a release date. Like I said, he's an exception.
I still think there's a pattern around releases, although as I noted before, it's either "To announce a new/big game" or "On the same day a game is released". So far, they hold true, and Luigi adheres to either type of reveal regardless.
As for Pac-Man, as I said before, he is well known, but his new games beyond the original arcade ones(and some of their remakes) just weren't that popular. This isn't that applicable to Mario, MegaMan,
or Sonic. They have mixed fans, obviously, but far lesser so in this case. They really aren't in the same category of gaming icons.
Nobody is denying Pac-Man is well known. We're denying he's on the level of the trifecta.(it's true, since there's more to comparable than just being well known) I am really hoping they choose a different person instead of Pac-Man, though. He's not bad, mind you. If nobody else(besides Snake coming back or being replaced with a Belmont comes up) is possible for a fourth Third Party, I'd take him, but I find many other unique choices. I like him, honestly, but not enough to get over other third parties. That is, plausible ones.
...Pac-Man. Platformers. Does not compute.
Johnknight1, stop. You don't know what you're saying here. At all. Pac-Man is not a platformer series. Its first platforming games, Pac Man 2: The New Adventures was not very good. At all. King of Arcade games? Hell yes. No denying that. Platformers? You gotta be trolling here.