perfectchaos83
Smash Champion
- Joined
- May 31, 2018
- Messages
- 2,814
It depends. He's got normal sized proportions in the PS4 release and chibi proportions in the 3DS.How tall would you Say Luminary is if he was in the game?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
It depends. He's got normal sized proportions in the PS4 release and chibi proportions in the 3DS.How tall would you Say Luminary is if he was in the game?
tbqh I have no idea. Never played a DQ game and don't know too much about the characters.How tall would you Say Luminary is if he was in the game?
Hmm..Okay.tbqh I have no idea. Never played a DQ game and don't know too much about the characters.
But his normal look is WAY more Iconic to him, which apparently Sakurai always chooses the more Iconic design. That's why he went with Classic Mega-Man for Example.It depends. He's got normal sized proportions in the PS4 release and chibi proportions in the 3DS.
Well that's presuming the whole "PK Kid height" thing doesn't come in the final version.I wondered how Luminary would work as an alt but I later found a figurine of Luminary with the same sword and shield.
http://thefwoosh.com/2018/11/square-enix-bring-arts-dragon-quest-xi-luminary/
Since the size and parameters of Erdrick could depend based on his size, maybe we can just compare him to Luminary instead. They should be pretty much the same for alts to work. I can personally see a mix between Marth and Link stats.
And, to be fair, they both also have chibi designs.Well that's presuming the whole "PK Kid height" thing doesn't come in the final version.
Both Erdrick and the Luminary are pretty tall and lean people.
Uhh, I'm having trouble finding an image of that.And, to be fair, they both also have chibi designs.
3DS versionUhh, I'm having trouble finding an image of that.
Closest I could get is this
And that's hardly what I'd consider chibi.
Yeah that's the only part that doesn't fit in. Can't think of many characters that can possibly fit that height, weight, and other parameters.Well that's presuming the whole "PK Kid height" thing doesn't come in the final version.
Both Erdrick and the Luminary are pretty tall and lean people.
I Personally haven't heard anything about a Party Mechanic, as Nobody brought it up. So it's likely to be a Rumor.Been playing a bit of catch-up with Brave speculation. Is the "party mechanic" still part of Brave's moveset or was that just a rumor? If it is, perhaps Brave is Euden from Dragalia Lost?
Brave stuff aside, let me extend some of thatVerge: has not thrown in on Erdrick, that is misinfo
Xenother: One leaker, don't know much on his belief regarding Erdrick
Tansut: Was who I was implying by leakers that believe it for reasons beyond the codename
The 5chan leak and Brave are the essential components here.
Source for LeakyPandy stating VGA stuff fell apartBrave stuff aside, let me extend some of that
Verge: hasn't personally called Erdrick yet asides the DQ ports stuff, the "unfortunately leaked" compiled S-E list had Erdrick as the most mentioned
Tansut: calls on Erdrick and says he's not even far on development, backs partially of the 5channel rumor due to the character and genderswap costumes, can't say for the pallet swaps or the Alegard stage
GameXplain: Jon Cartwright thinks its 100% true with a gut feel, others are 90-95% or thinks Steve/Erdrick are happening.
SpawnWave: says Erdrick was talked in insider circles for a good while
LeakyPandy: tweeted about DQ a while ago, made claims about the DLC updates and TGAs, days later before the TGAs Leaky said most of the TGAs stuff fell apart
Imran: not sure about the 5ch rumor, but provided an interview he did with Shimbori dodging a question about Smash.
regardless what they say, we still don't know if Brave is really Erdrick. Tansuit's claims feels very close to Brave's situation, but of course its not really convincing the skeptical public
Tunnel vision is focusing on one piece of evidence instead of putting it all together.You literally just described the opposite of tunnel vision.
Tunnel vision is focusing down one thing and only one thing.
Opening Brave up to multiple possibilities and not trying to fit Erdrick at any means necessary?
That's not tunnel vision.
Tunnel vision however is? The constantly changing landscape of the scenario and mystery at hand and no matter what happens you have people going with no doubt in their heads that it's Erdrick because the word of leakers mostly and nothing else.
It was Erdrick when you guys thought this character was going to be a straight up swordsman.
It was Erdrick when you guys thought this character was going to be a zoner.
It suddenly became Chibi Erdrick (and it was always sooooo obvious that Sakurai would use this look btw) when you guys saw the stats might not fit the more recognizable Bigger Erdrick model.
If anyone has tunnel vision. It's the 100 percent certain Erdrick people, because all you're focusing on is shoving him into an almost finished puzzle at any means necessary just because ''The leakers say so." and ''But the codename!"
Maybe it's just me, but I haven't seen anyone say any of these things. I've only actually seen Erdrick detractors use the stats to say what "Brave" is or isn't.It was Erdrick when you guys thought this character was going to be a straight up swordsman.
It was Erdrick when you guys thought this character was going to be a zoner.
It suddenly became Chibi Erdrick (and it was always sooooo obvious that Sakurai would use this look btw) when you guys saw the stats might not fit the more recognizable Bigger Erdrick model.
thank youSource for LeakyPandy stating VGA stuff fell apart
https://twitter.com/LeakyPandy/status/1062435913677107206
Just providing additional sources for you.
I mean counting the list, leaks, and insiders as three separate points seems like a stretch since they are more or less all the same thing. On top of that the biggest difference is the data is tangible and the leaks are not, the data is physically in anyone's game to go get and look at if you have the skills while the leaks require faith in someones info they got from someone, which in the whole history of video games the percentage of leaks who have been true vs false is not great. Finally the code name is about the least helpful argument anyone could make because we have no idea how their naming system works since we only have two code names to base off of and they're both really different.Tunnel vision is focusing on one piece of evidence instead of putting it all together.
The list, the leaks, the insiders and the codename all point to Erdrick.
The only thing one can argue does not are the stats but those can be changed constantly and are way too subjective to deduce from.
The codename could be applied to other characters but none of them have been supposedly leaked, are in the list Verge had or are backed up by insiders. Erdrick is the one who's in the middle of all these crossroads.
One of which they were aware they'd reveal before launch anyway, so realistically we only have one data point on how they'd codename fighter pass characters.The code name is about the least helpful argument anyone could make because we have no idea how their naming system works since we only have two code names to base off of and they're both really different.
Agreed on your point about the code name, Plant is so on the nose it could very well be his actual name and not coded at all.One of which they were aware they'd reveal before launch anyway, so realistically we only have one data point on how they'd codename fighter pass characters.
I wouldn't say the data is against the insiders though, to me it's similarly neutral, but each to their own.
I would be okay with this. I really enjoyed Dragon Quest Builders.Okay so in my mission to also give various DQ games a shot, I'm trying the demo for Dragon Quest Builders and...back during the "Minecraft content" days there was a joke about how "what if the Minecraft content was actually DQ Builders content". It was apparently shot down by Verge's sources, but...
Well...
I'm playing it now and...you know how the leak said Erdrick's stage was "Alefgard"? Well, that's the name of the continent you rebuild in DQB. I know that's also the continent from DQ3 but...really makes you think.
Data is inconclusive, leaks are not.I mean counting the list, leaks, and insiders as three separate points seems like a stretch since they are more or less all the same thing. On top of that the biggest difference is the data is tangible and the leaks are not, the data is physically in anyone's game to go get and look at if you have the skills while the leaks require faith in someones info they got from someone, which in the whole history of video games the percentage of leaks who have been true vs false is not great. Finally the code name is about the least helpful argument anyone could make because we have no idea how their naming system works since we only have two code names to base off of and they're both really different.
So when I look at it I see Data vs Leakers with code names being a solid neutral since the unknown nature of it means both sides could probably argue it supports them.
Now my personal opinion? I trust data I can see and "touch" way more than a glorified game of telephone.
I mean they're inconclusive in that you can't be certain the leaker has good info or isn't making stuff up.Data is inconclusive, leaks are not.
Never said it couldn't be Erdrick, in fact have multiple times said I think it could still be pointing at Erdrick, but its weird/different enough from what we would have expected that its worth considering other people that it might fit better.We can argue all day whether Brave's (unfinished) stats fit a character or not but saying it can't be Erdrick because of those is ignoring all the other evidence.
You could probably argue that Brave = Erdrick is almost too good to be a code name as it doesn't really obscure anything. That's the problem we have no idea how they were trying to use the code name, are they trying to throw everyone off? Was it just a placeholder that wasn't supposed to ever go beyond internal development? Until we see how more code names work we can't really say for sure.Sure, "Brave" could be a Bravely Default character... but they're not on the list.
Sure, those stats could fit Geno or whoever else... but they aren't ever called "Brave".
It feels way too much reaching to find someine who fits less than someone who has been on our face this entire time.
Gimme Cid from VII. Lit cigarette in all its glory. Lara Croft would be cool too, and maybe buddy from Just Cause. Primrose from Octopath maybe?What Square Enix based mii costumes do you guys think we might get? Obvious to return Geno and Chobobo hat but maybe they could even squeeze in some new FF things like Black Mage. As for an outlandish one I could see them doing 2B as a Mii costume (if they cover her legs up like Mythra).
I dont really think you need to cover a 2B Mii costume as long as you use her Default one and not the one after she self destructs.What Square Enix based mii costumes do you guys think we might get? Obvious to return Geno and Chobobo hat but maybe they could even squeeze in some new FF things like Black Mage. As for an outlandish one I could see them doing 2B as a Mii costume (if they cover her legs up like Mythra).
And so the prophecy has been fulfilled.......partially. This place seems fine still despite no announcement. Meh.This place is going to blow up if/when no direct gets annouced tomorrow.
lol I had to look up what you were talking about with the self-destruct thing and that't very goofy, why does blowing up only affect her skirt?I dont really think you need to cover a 2B Mii costume as long as you use her Default one and not the one after she self destructs.
I would like a Moggle one, some based on Shiva, Ifrit, Ramuh, Bahamut, and some based on FFVII party members.
ANGRYAnd so the prophecy has been fulfilled.......partially. This place seems fine still despite no announcement. Meh.
Tifa and Barret seemed like they would be obvious ones lolI dont really think you need to cover a 2B Mii costume as long as you use her Default one and not the one after she self destructs.
I would like a Moggle one, some based on Shiva, Ifrit, Ramuh, Bahamut, and some based on FFVII party members.
Ok, this is what happened, or at least my working theory:I'm not sure how stats work, but Brave still seems to be a short Fighter according to... Well, everyone? Then why is it that when Mizumi gave Ike Brave's stats, he became only slighlty shorter than Lucina?
That's still pretty big. In fact, shorter than Lucina is how I'd envision the newest render of Erdrick from Battle Road Víctory.
A character in his mid-late teens. Also, how I'd picture Crono's height being.
Honestly the answer is, no one is really sure.I'm not sure how stats work, but Brave still seems to be a short Fighter according to... Well, everyone? Then why is it that when Mizumi gave Ike Brave's stats, he became only slighlty shorter than Lucina?
That's still pretty big. In fact, shorter than Lucina is how I'd envision the newest render of Erdrick from Battle Road Víctory.
A character in his mid-late teens. Also, how I'd picture Crono's height being.
And what about Bowser being "taller" than Ridley?Mizumi's numbers were completely wrong. He claimed luigi had a higher height stat than falcon but... falcon actually is 3 height values taller than luigi. It seems he deleted his tweet now. No idea why he's spreading misinformation, but I will say it seems like he's trying really hard to say the height stat doesn't matter. Faking information is not a good way to make a point, though.
Funnily enough, back during the Grinch leak, people were claiming Occam's Razor in favor of said leak being real. You may be heading down a similar path here.I'm saying that Occam's Razor is in effect here.
Then again, Joker and the lack of Metroid at the 2018 VGA, proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that the leakers can get spectauraly bamboozled. I'd say people are well within rights to have their doubts.The last time people decided leakers were wrong and tried to argue in favor of who they wanted, Incineroar was labeled as leak bait.
We're not ridiculing people for believing Erdrick is the most likely candidate. Most people here, including myself, would agree with that sentiment.I'm saying that Occam's Razor is in effect here.
Several sources are claiming Erdrick for whatever reason. Simplest solution is that they're most likely correct in saying Erdrick, just like with Incineroar prior.
Why should people who want to stay the course be ridiculed for it?