@ Swiss: I didn't vote you because you were basically diet BoiledGoose at the time. And, now that you've actually responded to my questions, still are to an even lesser degree.
lol'd @ "oh wow FF didn't call me out what a wuss" -> "oh **** he did call me out derp" XD
Anyway, so basically you're saying that using a plurality lynch mechanic means that we have an indy in this game, in particular, likely a warlock? If you think that that rule is meant to help a warlock out, you're sadly mistaken, it actually HURTS a warlock's chances here in the SWF metagame, IMO.
Provided the alleged warlock is allowed to guess No Lynch, then it its actually more pro-Warlock to use the standard rules of "if no majority is reached, the result is a No Lynch", since this happens a lot here on SWF. Using the plurality lynch rule actually removes the most likely option IMO, AND it makes lynches more swingy since it inflates the power of the mafia close to deadline and allows surprising last minute lynches to occur.
This rule is definitely not pro Warlock if there even is one. The rule is COMPLETELY pro scum.
I seriously don't see how the plurality rule indicates we have a Warlock, and I really don't see 8v2v1 as that great of a setup. Either way though, a Warlock could still function just as well in a game where no majority = no lynch just as well as it can in a game without that rule, unless the mod is ****ing dumb and doesn't let the Warlock pick No Lynch as a guess, in which case we're metaing based on ****** choices, which is just a disaster waiting to happen.
Anyway, still wanting more from BG and Braig.