SwordsRbroken
Smash Apprentice
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2009
- Messages
- 104
These ninjas are getting ridiculous.....>.<
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Man, it sounds like we're getting put in time-out or something. I tried to prove a point SRB made wrong with a specific example. After that, he made a response that he shouldn't have been made, and then I made a response, that only half should have been typed, etc., and then everyone else had no idea what we were talking about. And yo, don't get impatient for an answer when you ask said question at 8:00 AM. I'm a sleepy dude.@Sold2 - Same question for you Sold2!
Naaaaaah, I'm coolIt is not on you anymore Rockin =P It's on Swords, but if you miss my vote that much I can always put it back on there.
I feel it's pretty helpful. Having a confirmed townie, we can now fully trust what he says as well as when he shares his opinion. We don't have to worry about him trying to trap us or do some other scum-like tactic.So I'm trying to figure out how helpful it is that we know Nix is confirmed town. Has anyone else played in a mafia game that started with confirmed alignments? So far this is the only unusual part of the game. I'm sure more stuff will pop up after the first Night, but we need to figure out a plan toDay.
So, you think it's too early for scum picks, but you FoS'ed me?FOS: SwordsRBroken
just for not reading what was said in the beginning of the thread.
Unfortunately, it's a bit too early for scum picks. I can't really get a solid read on anyone yet, though I find it amusing that Chibo hit me in RVS knowing I was away.
Oh, and I know this doesn't mean anything, but I figure I'd tell you anyway. I'm town.
I may or may not post once more before Apex. Obviously I'll post during Apex if I get a chance, but I doubt I'll get a chance.
@Rockin. My vote be on you because I don't find the Kirbyoshi or the UTDZac/Chibo wagons appealing, and I don't feel like unvoting
Explain please?unvote. By the request of Rockin?
Eh, I guess that's understandable. Seems some people have a certain style to voting. Didn't really had much of a problem with it on, but I was just curious.I should of told y'all that I was going to a party but I didn't miss much.
@Rockin. My vote be on you because I don't find the Kirbyoshi or the UTDZac/Chibo wagons appealing, and I don't feel like unvoting. I do know who I'm going to change it to soon enough but I wanna wait until I can make a convincing case, ya' know.
This bothers me too =/This is why I hate playing mafia nowadays.
Am I scum because I said I don't feel like unvoting and then did it in the same post? What conclusion are you trying to get to.
I'm still here.Who's not going to be at Apex?
This paragraph thoroughly rips his logic, but doesn't have a point yet. The only part here that could lead to Kirbyoshi = scum, is the part about use of WIFOM. It does reinforce the point in the next next paragraph.I was with you (aka against voting for you) until this. Unless you're playing with a dumb town, scum aren't going to be making everyone believe ANYTHING so easily, just by saying "k guys, I'm leader, let's lynch everyone but my scummates". And if scum does assume the leadership role and effectively direct town, it's because the scum is a better player and is good at manipulation, not simply because they became the "leader". And wtf, are you implying that if the leader DOESN'T get NKed, that makes them more likely to be scum? That's just WIFOM all over the place. And like Tiger said, if I had the choice between getting good opinions/reads/ideas out there at the cost of getting NKed, or being a sheep and following others around while keeping my life, I'd get NKed.
Kirbyoshi's case on Chibo was saying that Chibo is trying to force himself as our leader. If I'm interpreting right, you think that leaders altogether are anti-town, so you's be supporting his case with this, not proving him to be scum. Unless you're talking about when Kirbyoshi implied that in the future we may need a leader, in which case we've already kinda made a consensus that a real leader is not a bad thing, given that the town doesn't let someone force themselves as leader, or falls for some scumtrick.Not only that, but this concept of "leader" (and how they direct town's actions) is pretty anti-town. The collective is more likely to find scum than the individual, for the simple fact that more brainpower=better conclusions. Even if those conclusions might be tainted a bit by the input of scum, I would rely way more on the town's collective thought process rather than one person pointing out scum and us lynching them. Yes, Nix is guaranteed town (at least for now) but that doesn't mean he's the only one we should listen to and it certainly shouldn't mean we should do everything he says. We should all be our own leaders. /corniness
Okay, that's thinking if he was scum point of view. It's good to see that, but think of it from a town point of view(semi-hypothetically).Your reason for voting Zac wasn't unreasonable and at least got us out of RVS, but this attack on Chibo seems forced and seems to be you simply picking another target after you saw no one was going for Zac.
Everyone, think about this. if bedevere is scum, then he is just trying to get us to lynch a confirmed townie not today, but tomorrow or later. This would work out to scum's advantage because no one would be confirmed town. This would make it a lot harder for town in endgame.I'm still here.
@People saying not to assume roles, I'm not. All I'm saying is that I don't think Xiivi would put in a role like Nix's without having at least some type of role that abuses it, unless he put it in here simply so we could confuse ourselves with "WTF why would he put this role in?", which is kind of a ******* mod thing to do. Just don't assume Nix is 100% town if we never see a Yak or Cult flip, because it doesn't mean there isn't a recruiter, or some other role like it, out there. That's all I'm asking.
Did he not consider that the reason no one was agreeing with him was because his reason for voting Zac was not strong enough to really make a case, as others were saying? I did say that I wasn't going to vote Kirb for his case on Zac, but that was mostly because it got us out of RVS, and also because his case was possible, but not likely. Not something I would follow, but not something I would vote him on either.He wants to lynch someone he thinks is scum, but nobody else agrees with him.
You're forgetting option 4.) Backing down. Once he saw that no one was going with his case, he should have realized that his case simply was not a strong one and admitted his mistake (or are you saying that you agree with his case on Zac?). That would have been one way Kirb could have avoided my vote, but he continued to pursue Zac even after he switched his vote to Chibo.He doesn't have anything else he can really prove vs the person. From there, he has 3 choices. 1.) Do nothing and sit on his vote that's not going anywhere, 2.) Sheep onto another wagon (his own?), and 3.) "picking another target..." who he also feels is scum(maybe not as much as the other).
But you're forgetting the reason why he switched targets in the first place; he thought Chibo was trying to be the leader, which somehow made him scum. He explained why later, but as Tiger pointed out, if no townie became the leader, we wouldn't get much done, which is pretty anti-town. So, he started attacking a player for a very weak and anti-town reason (which, as Chibo said, seemed to be him grasping for straws), which, to me, doesn't seem like he's going after scum, more that he's going after the player that was "leading" the lynch on him, and effectively OMGUSing him (which he coincidentally accused Zac of in the same post). It was really his sudden switch to Chibo more than the post I quoted that made me vote him; the post I quoted simply confirmed that he wasn't voting Chibo for a very good reason at all (or do you also agree with Kirb's case on Chibo?).When you're under vote pressure, you have to both sufficiently defend yourself, and also prove your own use(ESPECIALLY Day 1). Naturally, the best and almost only way to prove your use is by making an attack on a player you believe to be scum! So obviously, 3.) is basically his only good choice.
...And if Bedevere is town, he's trying to stop us from assuming Nix is 100% town for the rest of the game and getting ourselves killed. >_>Everyone, think about this. if bedevere is scum, then he is just trying to get us to lynch a confirmed townie not today, but tomorrow or later. This would work out to scum's advantage because no one would be confirmed town. This would make it a lot harder for town in endgame.
unvote vote: sir bedevere
It just FEELS like you're kinda assuming roles (or at least putting a possible worry to something that does or does not exist). I don't want any of us to try and out guess the mod.I'm still here.
@People saying not to assume roles, I'm not. All I'm saying is that I don't think Xiivi would put in a role like Nix's without having at least some type of role that abuses it, unless he put it in here simply so we could confuse ourselves with "WTF why would he put this role in?", which is kind of a ******* mod thing to do. Just don't assume Nix is 100% town if we never see a Yak or Cult flip, because it doesn't mean there isn't a recruiter, or some other role like it, out there. That's all I'm asking.
Did you just vote the confirmed townie?!?!?!?!
His case was good, given how early-game it is, but I see what you mean. And backing down is a lot like 1.) Sitting on his vote. But the point is that he was under pressure from other voters and needed to prove he's worth to keep alive. Backing off and saying "I got nothing" wouldn't do much to help.You're forgetting option 4.) Backing down. Once he saw that no one was going with his case, he should have realized that his case simply was not a strong one and admitted his mistake (or are you saying that you agree with his case on Zac?). That would have been one way Kirb could have avoided my vote, but he continued to pursue Zac even after he switched his vote to Chibo.
A townie should know that they become a "leader" by doing pro-town actions and being smart. The logic is that a townie has no reason to try and force the title of leader, knowing that it will come to them if they're who the town needs. A scum player on the other hand wants to have influence over the weaker townies, and (mis)leading all the (weak?) townies is exactly what they want. People listen to leaders. The real problem is proving that Chibo wanted to "slip" his way into leader. I'd have to go back and read all of Chibo's posts to say if he was or was not, and I'm not going to prove a case right or wrong for someone else.But you're forgetting the reason why he switched targets in the first place; he thought Chibo was trying to be the leader, which somehow made him scum. He explained why later, but as Tiger pointed out, if no townie became the leader, we wouldn't get much done, which is pretty anti-town. So, he started attacking a player for a very weak and anti-town reason (which, as Chibo said, seemed to be him grasping for straws), which, to me, doesn't seem like he's going after scum, more that he's going after the player that was "leading" the lynch on him, and effectively OMGUSing him (which he coincidentally accused Zac of in the same post). It was really his sudden switch to Chibo more than the post I quoted that made me vote him; the post I quoted simply confirmed that he wasn't voting Chibo for a very good reason at all (or do you also agree with Kirb's case on Chibo?).