The rankings are hard to judge as always. It seems like its more dependent on character matchups than anything else, and who has experience against such a character and their styles.
lets say that in the case of deepsocal, edrees is top 4 but has trouble against omar's sheik.
Me, playing fox, the matchup is easier so i can win against omar more consistently. At the same time, edrees' peach will do better against Hugs' samus, since hugs knows how to effectively fight fox and fast fallers( watch him against pc chris and kdj if you dont believe it) , from avoiding their shines to edgeguarding and their spacing. Romeo's falcon will lose to my fox but does better on samuses and other various characters like luigi probably. all the while, luigi can combo **** fox and it just goes on and on.
originally posted by nublet06:
"Emerican has beaten gabe, Ultra, Mike Y, split pools with HugS, and he always takes edrees to 3rd, 5th game. i know hes good enough to make it. Lee Puff and Teba are also 10x better that they have ever been."
Obviously, you're pushing for palmdale to get moved up, and its understandable to be biased. Yet why point out people's achievements, when we all have them. People will take notice in time, as a player keeps progressing and getting better. I dont have to point out what edrees, me, or evilnemesis have done recently for it to get acknowledged.
originally posted by nublet06:
"and bone beat Boa....but i think that was a fluke....lol"
its also a common thing to want to affliate your friend's victories and your own as part of one's personal abilities and skills. Yet, when it comes to other people beating you or one's friends, its easier to just blame it on external cues and other johns. Maybe it was a fluke, or maybe bones had more marth practice than boa had peach practice. Different styles also account for wins/losses.
I mean, even in my own match against boa, i was leading in the third game b4 he pulled a ken combo at the end. Is it as black and white to say that boa won because he's better, and had i won it woulda been a fluke? Was my bad DI with the ken combo the real fluke? It's all very situational. The same can be applied to other matches like the omar vs mango fight, in which mango missed his last rest and allowed omar to win.
its just psychology in the way we choose to see players's achievements.
it all boils down to: "I won because of my skill"
or.."i lost because of my controller, wasnt playing well that day, didnt get enough sleep, didnt care, was tired, it was a fluke....john john"