(grammarnazi)
Not enough Kirby's go up against Snake's in tournament settings - so it's really hard to put the hammer on the nail.
red is wrong
green is right
(/grammarnazi)
I dunno if any of you guys have experienced this, but these are my experiences...I'll put it as an example.
Let's say there's a Kirby player whose skill level is say, 8 out of 10.
He's playing a bunch of matches (tourney, MM, friendlies, whatever) against a Snake, whose skill level is say 6-7 out of 10.
Kirby wins the first match, 2-stocking his opponent.
Wins the next match, JV 2-stock.
Wins the next couple matches, 1 stock.
After that, matches come down to last hit, or he starts losing.
...that's what it seems like to me. It seems that the more a Kirby plays a Snake, the bigger the advantage the Snake will have. Maybe I have trouble adapting and changing my style, but I don't think that's it. I just think Snake has more options than Kirby does.
I mean, this was my experience in a tourney match a couple months ago: I ***** a Snake for the first 2 stocks of the first match, and then by the end of the match, he caught up and I won, but it was closer than it should have been. After that, he won the next two matches, winning the set.
yesterday, I played an AiB ladder set, and the first game I dominated in, next one I lost, and third one I barely managed to win. After that we played friendlies, and it kept coming down basically to last hit.
It might be because Snake lives so **** long that he can afford to make more mistakes. All of Snake's
broken moves and tactics aside, I think his weight is what makes this matchup so difficult. Obviously it's winnable, but the Snake is allowed more mistakes per match.
......unless it's the mistake of Mortar Sliding to the edge of the stage when Kirby's trying to recover. Don't do it, ******** Snake players >=(