Like......
I feel like saying this...
But Sakurai doesn't have to continually shock you.
Reps are not meant to be shocking. They're meant to be people who are the top of the top or at least fresh Nintendo faces.
So of course the list is outside of Luminary filled with people people have previous talked about for Smash or just talk about a lot when it comes to Square Enix.
This thinking is why I was able to figure out way before she was announced that Bayonetta would be in Smash. Because it made SENSE. She was a fresh face that Nintendo was investing in. Sakurai always looks for fresh Nintendo faces and there she was.
Honestly I think fans spend way too much time taking the term "rep" literally and thinking of things to represent when it's never been
just about repping.
Not all Smash picks are picked for the same reasons. If they were, characters like Mr. Game & Watch and R.O.B, at the very least, probably wouldn't be playable. The roster would
actually potentially be boring.
That's not even to say that people who have speculated for some time now have all the best ideas, but there are some ideas that just...don't seem like they're really thought out or make much sense. I won't name them because they're my personal opinion, but I think there's too much bias involved, but frankly I think the Smash fanbase is basically a bunch of different fanbases mixing together and not being able to see eye to eye on character picks.
Plus I generally think the whole "repping" thing gets blown way out of proportion though.
Then there's always the people who support things to be the "odd one out" when really it's just a ridiculous pick that obviously wasn't going to be in, but was used as a springboard for attention lol. That's not for all oddball picks, but some...definitely are.
You're right though. It helps to have the experience of previous Smash games when making our predictions!