Starcutter
Resident Beedrill
I still think a Xenoblade 2 character is guaranteed.
If it's not the base roster, it'll be DLC.
If it's not the base roster, it'll be DLC.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I mean that would be about 2 years of development time. Not to mention the fact that it was able to release in 2017 implies that it had to have a lot done when it was shown off in the beginning of 2017. They had to have at least all the core concept completely established in 2016.It should be noted that development for XC2 began in July 2014--meaning the story, characters, world, and game mechanics weren't decided right from the get-go. By the time the Smash 6 design plan was finalized (assuming it was decided sometime in 2016), Sakurai may have felt that there wasn't enough concrete ideas to draw from.
Honestly, that's surprising, Spyro just seems something that would hit in Japan. I hope Spyro Reignited gets a Japanese release.I'd love to have Spyro in Smash, but too bad he unfortunately never took off in Japan like Crash did. We don't even know if the remake is getting released there, and the vast majority of Spyro and Skylanders games haven't been localized for Japan.
Absolutely. It's the most newcomer-friendly game in the series.I never played any XB game, so I didn't know. Is it worth playing?
I've said before that Tiki would make a cool Fire Emblem character should they choose to go a different route with that franchise. Not that it'll necessarily happen, but if Corrin were to not return, Tiki would be a cool (and more Dragonlike) character to use Dragonstones in smash.Yeah, it's too bad.
I wouldn't mind seeing more dragons, though. Or draconic in some way.
Personally I'd argue that both Rex and Springman are going to be DLCI still think a Xenoblade 2 character is guaranteed.
If it's not the base roster, it'll be DLC.
They actually ruined Spyro's gameplay for the Japanese version by zooming out the camera and making his charge the same speed as his walk.I'd love to have Spyro in Smash, but too bad he unfortunately never took off in Japan like Crash did. We don't even know if the remake is getting released there, and the vast majority of Spyro and Skylanders games haven't been localized for Japan.
I've said before that Tiki would make a cool Fire Emblem character should they choose to go a different route with that franchise. Not that it'll necessarily happen, but if Corrin were to not return, Tiki would be a cool (and more Dragonlike) character to use Dragonstones in smash.
Wow that sounds terrible. Why on earth would they think that's a good idea? I really hope Reignited does him more justice in Japan's eye, not even considering Smash. Spyro is sooo fun, it makes me so sad to find that the game was pretty ruined for others.They actually ruined Spyro's gameplay for the Japanese version by zooming out the camera and making his charge the same speed as his walk.
No wonder it tanked.
That's because the Japanese releases of Spyro 1 and Spyro 2 are pretty bad. For some reason they royally screwed up the camera system in both games, along with other weird changes that overall make the games play worse. They knew they made a mistake, since the "director's cut" of the former actually has an option that reverts back to the USA version if you've 100% the game.Honestly, that's surprising, Spyro just seems something that would hit in Japan. I hope Spyro Reignited gets a Japanese release.
Not gonna lie, her Warriors dragon did not look the way I expected it to. I was expecting something much more like her Fire Emblem Heroes dragon.
I'm just saying.
HOW did you know that was my favourite Digimon!?Yeah, it's too bad.
I wouldn't mind seeing more dragons, though. Or draconic in some way.
I'm not arguing there isn't a possibility, but I do think it's quite offbase to say "well, it was in development for this long, so we must get a lot of content in Smash and saying otherwise is a fallacy" with certainty when we are in a speculative part of pre-release as a whole and there are many examples to the contrary. We can't pretend those can't be applicable to XC2's case, particularly in terms of characters since the only example that we have that isn't a clone (since I doubt anyone wants Rex/Pyra to be a clone) is Greninja, who got in based on having a slot set aside in the drafting phases of the project and there's no certainty that Xenoblade will get the same luxury.But that doesn't mean he completely dismisses games that are close to the smash release either. Mario kart 8 came out after 3d world and is still got a stage. Wooly World wasn't out yet and it still got a stage. And then there is Greninja's existence.
Everything hinges on what exactly Sakurai's plans were. If he just wanted a new Xenoblade character then Rex is still possible.
I know you don't know the despair I felt in the Skylanders days, jeez thank goodness for that square snout, look at it! Lovely.can we just say how CLEAN the Spyro Reignited design for Spyro is?
It's just... I never even played Spyro as a kid but I LOVE this
Looks super derpy in the face as well.I have one problem with this Spyro remake.
What's up with Sparx's real bug legs?
To me, at least, the appeal of Spyro is really as simple as getting to play a cute little dragon. The game were pretty fun overall, and came around in that era that many great 3D platformers were appearing. But really, how often did you get to be the dragon? Especially back then. Most games were more focused on slaying the dragons.Honestly. I've always been a Team Crash over Team Spyro.
So to me, Crash will always be my favourite of the two, so, of course Crash will be the one I want.
I just don't ge the appeal of Spyro, but that does not mean that I do not like him at all.
I think a lot of people, myself included, don't really see Toon Link as much of a newcomer, he's basically tweaked young link. If you take that into account, Zelda hasn't had a newcomer since Melee.What do you think about the universes with potential to get new characters?
I think it was kind of silly for people to think there were going to be Zelda, Donkey Kong, or Kirby newcomers in Smash for Wii U.
All of these universes received newcomers in Brawl and Super Mario was left dry. By the time Smash for Wii U/3DS started development, the most recent DK game was Donkey Kong Country Returns, where the main stars were Donkey & Diddy. Making them sufficient as the sole representatives for SSB4.
Zelda was another foolish hope. Mario & Pokemon were both shown to have Five newcomers. Zelda already had five as well as a newcomer in the previous game.
The difference between then and now, however, is hopeful. Mario and Pokemon will likely receive at least one newcomer, so it's very possible that Sakurai will look at Zelda as well, with the interest in their being a fair share on the select screen as there was in Brawl and Smash 4.
Things have changed for Donkey Kong as well, with the popularity of Tropical Freeze which featured prominent roles for DK characters such as Cranky, Funky, and Dixie, unlike DKC Returns.
As for what characters will get in, I think Cranky Kong is the safest bet for DK along with Dixie Kong as an unlockable character.
For Zelda, I think they are gonna go with Toon Zelda and Tetra. People may say "Well, that's a lot of Zeldas". However it's important to note that Link, Zelda, and Ganondorf are what make up the most notable characters in the series. Toon Zelda may very well end up being the spirit/phantom version and Tetra on the other hand bares no resemblance to Zelda other than being an incarnation of her and not even the same one as we have now.
I believe Toon Zelda and Tetra are the next most important /iconic characters of the overall series as well as the two to bring the most potential.
Oh, Toon Zelda appeared all right. As... a Link costume...I think a lot of people, myself included, don't really see Toon Link as much of a newcomer, he's basically tweaked young link. If you take that into account, Zelda hasn't had a newcomer since Melee.
I also believe that Cranky Kong is far from likely. All he has going for him is Tropical Freeze. Dixie has that as well as her starring in 2 other DKC games as more of a lead that she was in Tropical Freeze. I also think Sakurai might have taken K Rool's popularity into consideration, especially if you look at the K Rool Mii costume.
As for which Zelda newcomers, I could see someone from Breath of the Wild, or Tingle. I'd love to see Tetra but I think the WW style of games are slowly dying out. Plus, the last "Toon" Zelda game was Tri-Force Heroes, and I don't think Toon Zelda (or Tetra) was even IN that one.
So Toon Zelda is a Toon Link clone confirmed?Oh, Toon Zelda appeared all right. As... a Link costume...
On that topic, we need more alt costumes outside of mii Fighters.Oh, Toon Zelda appeared all right. As... a Link costume...
Good logical and precise post. I will proceed to nitpick one of your points to prove you wrong!!!Prior to Melee; we didn’t know clones would be included.
Very true. We can only make assumptions based on the very limited information we have. Time will tell.I mean that would be about 2 years of development time. Not to mention the fact that it was able to release in 2017 implies that it had to have a lot done when it was shown off in the beginning of 2017. They had to have at least all the core concept completely established in 2016.
This question also makes me wonder what exactly is going to happen with costumes/pallets in this game. A highly requested feature I recall seeing for Smash 4 was more actual costumes, even if they came as paid dlc. Does anyone think its possible that we get a lot more detailed costumes this time around? Perhaps instead of making clone characters, they make multiple full costume changes for pre-existing characters?On that topic, we need more alt costumes outside of mii Fighters.
We didn't get Outset Toon Link twice in a row and that makes me sad.
I would say no myself. They were a cool addition to Sun and Moon, but they are not really distinct enough to warrant a new character. I could see Pikachu getting an Alolan Raichu colouring in conjunction with the corresponding hat for the game though.I haven't really seen anybody discussing Alolan Forms. Of course some will be Pokeballs, but is there any chance one could be playable?
All he has going for him is Tropical Freeze?! Cranky Kong is omnipresent throughout history of Donkey Kong Country. He's the third most integrated Kong of the whole series. What are you talking about?!I think a lot of people, myself included, don't really see Toon Link as much of a newcomer, he's basically tweaked young link. If you take that into account, Zelda hasn't had a newcomer since Melee.
I also believe that Cranky Kong is far from likely. All he has going for him is Tropical Freeze.
That's less going for him than Cranky. I do believe the ballot is an indication that King K. Rool could be the newcomer, but I don't think everyone who was a Mii costume is now likely to be a newcomer.Dixie has that as well as her starring in 2 other DKC games as more of a lead that she was in Tropical Freeze. I also think Sakurai might have taken K Rool's popularity into consideration, especially if you look at the K Rool Mii costume.
So Cranky Kong only has Tropical Freeze going for him, but now you're saying a one off character from Breath of The Wild is the best bet?As for which Zelda newcomers, I could see someone from Breath of the Wild
Well to be fair, Cranky has never been more than a grumpy old guy with dialogue til Tropical Freeze. Just a supporting character. K. Rool was a multi-occurrence boss, and the main boss of the entire franchise for a while.All he has going for him is Tropical Freeze?! Cranky Kong is omnipresent throughout history of Donkey Kong Country. He's the third most integrated Kong of the whole series. What are you talking about?!
Don't you usually prop up Waddle Dee because he was playable in Return to Dreamland? Why is it always about whoever was playable first with you?
That's less going for him than Cranky. I do believe the ballot is an indication that King K. Rool could be the newcomer, but I don't think everyone who was a Mii costume is now likely to be a newcomer.
But, you think Cranky Kong only has Tropical Freeze going for him? What has King K. Rool had going for him the past ten years?
So Cranky Kong only has Tropical Freeze going for him, but now you're saying a one off character from Breath of The Wild is the best bet?
There is nobody from Breath of The Wild. We're already getting BOTW versions of Link & Zelda and likely Sheik. The only new characters are the Champions. And you can't have just one of them any more than having one Koopaling. Even if there was only one champion, it would be just as ridiculous as having Midna or Ghirahim.
You're all over the map. First you're saying the best bet is a character who's been absent for ten years and then you're saying the best bet is whomever appeared in the newest game.
Oh. Okay. "And Zelda was nothing more than a damsel that cried for help." You see how easy it is to demean any character? "R.O.B.'s just a plastic toy that collects dust. And all Rosalina does in Super Mario Galaxy is just stand there. And all Palutena does is give you moral support."Well to be fair, Cranky has never been more than a grumpy old guy with dialogue til Tropical Freeze.
I apologize. I've just had to explain the same things one too many times. Not trying to be mean.Things are getting a little too heated. Let's all take a deep breath and discuss things a bit more civilly and without pointless aggression. There's no real reason to argue someone into submission. It doesn't help any arguments being made, and it only makes things harder to be civil.
This was still pretty aggressive, and I'm not trying to compare Cranky to another character. I was speaking about Cranky himself, pointing out that he has literally just been a support character since he was in the game up until Tropical Freeze. To compare him to another character, Dixie and K. Rool are both valid characters to bring up here. Dixie was co-main in one game, the lead in another. She also appears in Tropical Freeze at the same level as Cranky. And now with K. Rool, as I said in my previous post, was the main boss of the entire franchise for a long time. I'm not saying nor did I ever say Cranky isn't happening, I'm just trying to add to the discussion and trying to point out why he may not be as likely as another comparable character from the same region of Nintendo.Oh. Okay. "And Zelda was nothing more than a damsel that cried for help." You see how easy it is to demean any character? "R.O.B.'s just a plastic toy that collects dust. And all Rosalina does in Super Mario Galaxy is just stand there. And all Palutena does is give you moral support."
I'm not being aggressive here. I'm just demonstrating why you're making a horrible argument. And of course you're gonna say "Well, those characters aren't the same". No two characters in the Nintendo universe are exactly the same. These are "analogies".
Just a quick reminder than media-only posts with no relevant text are considered spam. Please try to add more.
Well that's nice to see. I guess Verlisify is not unfairly seen to be as toxic in this community.
Movie trailer on the 9th probably the Zeraora guy and or the 8th gen evee.